Implementing AMGS: A Practical Guide to Sustainable Chromatographic Method Development

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive guide for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals on implementing the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS). Developed by the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable, AMGS is a comprehensive metric that benchmarks the environmental impact of chromatographic methods by evaluating solvent health, safety, environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and solvent waste. We explore the foundational principles of AMGS, detail its methodological application with practical examples from industry leaders like AstraZeneca, provide troubleshooting and optimization strategies for improving method scores, and position AMGS within the broader landscape of green analytical chemistry tools. This guide empowers laboratories to systematically enhance their sustainability profiles while maintaining analytical quality, supporting the pharmaceutical industry's ambitious environmental goals.

Understanding AMGS: The Foundation of Sustainable Analytical Chemistry

The Critical Need for Green Metrics in Pharmaceutical Analysis

Pharmaceutical analysis, vital for ensuring drug safety and efficacy, traditionally relies on resource-intensive processes that generate substantial waste. The global production of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), estimated at 65–100 million kilograms annually, generates approximately 10 billion kilograms of waste, with disposal costs reaching $20 billion [1]. Analytical chemistry's success in determining composition plays a crucial role in addressing environmental challenges, yet its dependence on energy-intensive processes, non-renewable resources, and waste generation raises significant sustainability concerns [2]. This application note establishes the critical need for standardized green metrics, particularly the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS), within pharmaceutical analysis workflows to quantify and reduce this environmental impact while maintaining analytical integrity.

Green Metrics: A Comparative Toolkit for Researchers

The principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) aim to mitigate the adverse effects of analytical activities on human health and the environment [3]. Numerous metrics have been developed to assess the greenness of analytical methods, each with distinct characteristics, merits, and limitations [4]. The table below summarizes the most widely used GAC tools relevant to pharmaceutical analysis.

Table 1: Comparison of Key Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) Metrics

Metric Name	Type of Output	Key Assessment Criteria	Primary Advantages	Primary Limitations
AMGS (Analytical Method Greenness Score) [5]	Numerical Score (%)	Solvent health/safety/environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy, solvent waste.	Quantitative, covers multiple environmental facets, specific for LC/SFC methods.	Currently limited to LC/SFC (GC version expected 2026).
NEMI (National Environmental Methods Index) [3]	Pictogram (4-quadrant circle)	PBT chemicals, hazardous waste, corrosivity (pH 2-12), waste amount (<50 g).	Simple, immediate visual interpretation.	Qualitative only, provides general information.
Analytical Eco-Scale [3]	Numerical Score (100=ideal)	Reagent toxicity, energy consumption, waste generation.	Semi-quantitative, penalty point system is intuitive.	Requires detailed method data for accurate scoring.
GAPI (Green Analytical Procedure Index) [3]	Pictogram (multi-step)	Multiple stages from sample collection to waste treatment.	Comprehensive, covers entire analytical procedure.	Complex pictogram can be difficult to interpret.
AGREEprep (Analytical GREEnness Metric for Sample Preparation) [6]	Numerical Score (0-1)	10 criteria for sample preparation including waste, energy, and reagent toxicity.	Specific, quantitative focus on sample preparation.	Does not cover the entire analytical process.
BAGI (Blue Applicability Grade Index) [3]	Pictogram	Applicability and practicality of the method.	Assesses practical implementation potential.	Does not directly focus on environmental impact.
Diethyltoluamide-d7	Diethyltoluamide-d7, CAS:1219799-37-7, MF:C12H17NO, MW:198.31 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
PI3K-IN-22	PI3K-IN-22, CAS:1202884-94-3, MF:C31H35F3N8O3, MW:624.7 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

A recent comprehensive assessment of 174 standard methods from CEN, ISO, and Pharmacopoeias using the AGREEprep metric revealed that 67% of methods scored below 0.2 (on a 0-1 scale), highlighting that most official methods still rely on resource-intensive, outdated techniques [6]. The performance was poorest in environmental analysis of organic compounds (86% scoring below 0.2), though pharmaceutical methods also showed significant room for improvement (45% scoring below 0.2) [6]. This demonstrates the urgent need for tools like AMGS to drive methodological improvements.

AMGS Protocol: A Step-by-Step Guide for Implementation

Principles of the AMGS Calculator

The AMGS calculator, developed from an initiative by the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable, is designed as a comparative metric for method development rather than an absolute measure for method rejection [5]. It functions by evaluating four primary components:

• Solvent Impact: Factors in health, safety, and environmental impact of all solvents used.
• Cumulative Energy Demand (CED): Accounts for the energy required to produce the solvents.
• Instrument Energy Usage: Based on the power consumption of the instrument over the method runtime.
• Method Solvent Waste: Calculated from the total volume of solvent waste generated.

The metric produces a score where a lower AMGS percentage indicates a greener method. The calculator also employs color-coding (green, yellow, red) to highlight which category contributes most significantly to the score, guiding scientists toward areas for potential improvement [5].

Detailed Experimental Protocol for AMGS Assessment

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Pharmaceutical Analysis

Item/Category	Function	Green Alternatives & Considerations
Extraction Sorbents (SPE) [7]	Isolate and concentrate analytes from complex matrices.	Use of selective sorbents (e.g., MIPs) to reduce solvent consumption and improve efficiency.
Primary Secondary Amine (PSA) [7]	Clean-up agent in QuEChERS to remove polar interferences.	Enables efficient sample clean-up with minimal solvent use compared to traditional methods.
Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fiber [7]	Solvent-less extraction and concentration of analytes.	Eliminates the need for organic solvents, significantly reducing waste and toxicity.
Green Solvents (e.g., Ethanol, Water) [7]	Mobile phase or extraction solvent.	Replace hazardous solvents like acetonitrile or methanol to reduce environmental and health impacts.
UHPLC Systems [7]	Chromatographic separation.	Reduces solvent consumption and analysis time via smaller particle sizes and higher pressures.
Automated Sample Preparation [2]	Handle sample preparation steps.	Reduces reagent consumption, waste generation, and operator exposure to hazards.

Protocol: Implementing AMGS to Evaluate a Liquid Chromatography Method for Drug Analysis

I. Scope This protocol provides a standardized procedure for calculating the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) for a liquid chromatography (HPLC or UPLC) method used in pharmaceutical analysis. It guides the user through data collection, input, and interpretation of results to compare the greenness of different methodological approaches.

II. Safety

• Standard laboratory safety procedures must be followed.
• Consult safety data sheets (SDS) for all chemicals and solvents used in the analytical method.
• Proper personal protective equipment (PPE) is required when handling chemical standards and solvents.

III. Materials and Equipment

• Computer with internet access.
• AMGS Calculator (online tool from ACS GCI PR website).
• Detailed parameters of the chromatographic method to be assessed.
• Solvent volumes and types used in sample preparation and mobile phase.
• Instrumental energy specifications (if available) or default values from the calculator.

IV. Step-by-Step Procedure

Step 1: Define Method Scope and Boundaries

• Clearly define the start and end points of the analysis (e.g., from sample weighing to final detection).
• Decide if system suitability testing (SST) will be included in the assessment. If so, collect data on solvent volumes used for all dilution steps of the SST [5].

Step 2: Gather Method Parameters for the Chromatographic Run Collect the following data for a single injection:

• Mobile Phase Composition: List all solvents (e.g., Water, Acetonitrile, Methanol) and their respective percentages in the mobile phase (A and B).
• Flow Rate: Record in mL/min.
• Injection Volume: Record in µL.
• Run Time: Record in minutes.
• Column Dimensions: Column length, internal diameter, and particle size.

Step 3: Quantify Sample Preparation Solvents

• List all solvents and volumes used in sample preparation steps (e.g., extraction, dilution, reconstitution). If a method like QuEChERS or SPME is used, which minimizes solvent, this should be accurately recorded [7].

Step 4: Access and Input Data into the AMGS Calculator

• Navigate to the official AMGS calculator tool [5].
• Input the data gathered in Steps 2 and 3 into the corresponding fields of the calculator.
• For instrument energy, use default values provided by the calculator unless specific instrument power data is available.

Step 5: Calculate and Record the Score

• Execute the calculation. The tool will generate an overall AMGS percentage and a color-coded breakdown showing the contribution of each category (solvent, energy, waste).
• Record the overall score and the category-specific scores.

Step 6: Interpret Results and Identify Areas for Improvement

• A lower AMGS score indicates a greener method.
• Use the color-coding to identify the largest contributor to the environmental footprint (e.g., a red "Instrument Energy" score suggests shortening the run time could significantly improve greenness) [5].
• Compare scores for different method variants (e.g., different run times, solvents, or sample prep techniques) to guide optimization toward greener practices.

V. Troubleshooting

• Inconsistent Comparisons: Ensure all methods being compared are assessed using the same system boundaries (e.g., with or without SST).
• Missing Solvent Data: The calculator requires complete solvent information for an accurate score. Estimate volumes carefully if exact measurements are not available.
• High Score in One Category: Focus method improvement efforts on the category (solvent, energy, waste) flagged with a yellow or red color.

Application in Pharmaceutical Analysis: From Theory to Practice

Implementing green metrics like AMGS facilitates the transition from a linear "take-make-dispose" model toward a Circular Analytical Chemistry (CAC) framework [2]. Practical applications in pharmaceutical analysis include:

4.1 Green Sample Preparation

• Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME): This technique combines extraction and enrichment into a single, solvent-free step, directly reducing solvent waste generation [7].
• QuEChERS: Originally developed for pesticide analysis, this method is recognized as a green extraction technique due to its minimal solvent consumption compared to traditional means [7].
• Automation and Integration: Automated systems save time, lower reagent consumption, and reduce waste generation while minimizing human exposure to hazardous chemicals [2]. Integrating multiple preparation steps into a single workflow cuts down on resource use [2].

4.2 Direct Chromatographic Analysis Where possible, direct analytical techniques that require no sample preparation are ideal from a GAC perspective. While many pharmaceutical matrices are complex, some APIs or formulations may be amenable to direct injection after simple filtration or dilution, dramatically reducing the method's environmental footprint [7].

4.3 Instrumental Method Optimization A key strategy revealed by AMGS is maximizing sample throughput, which reduces the environmental cost per sample. This can be achieved by [2]:

• Accelerating the analysis (e.g., transferring from HPLC to UHPLC to reduce run time and solvent use [7]).
• Treating samples in parallel where instrumentation allows.
• Automating the analytical process.

4.4 Mitigating the Rebound Effect A critical consideration in green analytical chemistry is the "rebound effect," where efficiency gains are offset by increased usage [2]. For example, a cheap, fast microextraction method might lead laboratories to perform significantly more analyses, negating the per-analysis environmental benefit. Laboratories should implement strategies like optimized testing protocols and predictive analytics to ensure that greener methods do not inadvertently lead to over-testing [2].

The adoption of green metrics, particularly the AMGS, is not merely an environmental consideration but a strategic imperative for the modern pharmaceutical industry [1]. It provides a quantitative framework to benchmark and drive the development of analytical methods that align with the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry. This application note demonstrates that by integrating the AMGS protocol into routine method development and optimization, researchers and drug development professionals can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of pharmaceutical analysis while maintaining high analytical standards, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable and responsible industry.

What is AMGS? Origins and Development by ACS Green Chemistry Institute

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) is a dedicated metric developed to evaluate and benchmark the environmental sustainability of analytical methods, particularly in chromatography [4]. This calculator serves as a general metric guideline to compare methods during development, providing researchers with a quantitative means to assess the environmental impact of their analytical procedures [5]. The fundamental principle behind AMGS is straightforward: the lower the numerical AMGS value, the greener the analytical method [5]. This inverse relationship encourages scientists to continuously refine their methods to minimize environmental impact while maintaining analytical validity.

The AMGS framework specifically factors in multiple dimensions of environmental impact, including solvent health, safety, and environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste [5]. By integrating these diverse factors into a single calculable score, AMGS provides a holistic view of a method's environmental footprint, enabling analysts to make more informed decisions during method development and optimization. The metric employs a color-coding system as a visual guideline to indicate if a specific energy score category contributes disproportionately to the total AMGS value, highlighting areas where the method could be improved [5].

Historical Development and Institutional Background

The development of AMGS represents a collaborative effort spearheaded by the American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute (ACS GCI) Pharmaceutical Roundtable. This initiative emerged from the pharmaceutical industry's growing recognition that approximately 50% of materials used to manufacture bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients are solvents, creating significant environmental implications that needed addressing [8]. The AMGS calculator originated from a Microsoft Excel-based program first developed by Laurent Lehman at Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, and was subsequently improved through development by members of the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable's Analytical Chemistry team [5].

The institutional development of green chemistry, which provided the foundation for tools like AMGS, can be traced through several key historical phases. The political and scientific momentum began building with the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990, which marked a formal shift from end-of-pipeline control toward pollution prevention as a primary strategy [9]. This legislative foundation was further strengthened by the establishment of the ACS Green Chemistry Institute (ACS GCI), which has led the American Chemical Society's efforts to catalyze the implementation of sustainable approaches to chemistry and engineering across the globe [10]. The historical growth of green chemistry demonstrates how contextual influences and the user-friendliness of the term became drivers for its explosive development [9] [11].

Table: Historical Development of Green Chemistry and AMGS

Time Period	Key Developments	Institutional Drivers
Pre-1990	Informal origins of green chemistry concepts	US EPA, academic researchers
1990-1998	Pollution Prevention Act of 1990; Early green chemistry symposiums	US Congress, US EPA, NSF
1999-2008	Rapid growth of green chemistry; Institutionalization	ACS Green Chemistry Institute, pharmaceutical industry
2008-Present	Development of specialized metrics including AMGS	ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable, industry-academia collaborations

The current version of the AMGS calculator is specifically designed for determining liquid chromatography and SFC greenness scores, with the ACS GCIPR Analytical Focus Team actively working on improvements and an updated version that will support Gas Chromatography (GC) methods by early 2026 [5]. This ongoing development reflects the commitment to continuous improvement and expansion of the tool's applicability across different analytical techniques.

The AMGS Calculation Framework

Core Calculation Components

The AMGS calculation incorporates multiple environmental factors into a comprehensive assessment framework. The metric systematically evaluates three primary categories that contribute to the overall environmental impact of analytical methods. The color-coding system implemented in AMGS results helps identify which category disproportionately contributes to the total score, guiding researchers toward targeted improvements [5].

Table: AMGS Assessment Categories and Improvement Strategies

Assessment Category	Key Components Evaluated	Common Improvement Strategies
Solvent Impact	Health, safety, and environmental factors of solvents used	Substitute hazardous solvents with greener alternatives; reduce solvent volumes
Energy Consumption	Cumulative energy demand; instrument energy usage	Shorten method run time; optimize temperature parameters; implement energy-efficient equipment
Waste Generation	Method solvent waste; by-products	Miniaturize methods; implement solvent recycling; reduce sample preparation steps

The AMGS framework encourages environmental impact awareness and provides analysts with concrete data to support the development of greener methods [5]. The calculation specifically accounts for the system suitability test (SST), typically representing 0.05% (v/v) relative to the API reference standard, and includes the total volume of dilutions used when preparations involve serial dilution [5]. This comprehensive approach ensures that even ancillary aspects of analytical methods are incorporated into the environmental assessment.

Implementation Protocol

Protocol: Calculating AMGS for Liquid Chromatography Methods

Purpose: To quantitatively assess the environmental sustainability of liquid chromatography methods using the standardized AMGS calculator.

Materials and Equipment:

• AMGS calculator (digital tool)
• Complete method parameters including runtime, flow rates, and column dimensions
• Solvent types and volumes for mobile phase preparation
• Sample preparation details including solvents and consumables
• System suitability test parameters and dilution schemes

Procedure:

• Method Parameter Documentation

  • Record all method duration parameters including equilibration time, injection cycle time, and total analytical run time
  • Document column oven temperature and any temperature gradient programs
  • Note detector-specific energy requirements (e.g., PDA, MS, CAD)

• Solvent Inventory Assessment

  • Identify all solvents used in mobile phase preparations with exact volumes
  • Document solvent volumes used for sample preparation including extraction, dilution, and reconstitution
  • Record solvent volumes used for system suitability tests and standard preparations

• Waste Stream Quantification

  • Calculate total waste generation during analytical runs including purge volumes and needle wash solvents
  • Account for waste generated during sample preparation including used vials, filters, and solid-phase extraction cartridges
  • Include solvent waste from system suitability tests and quality control samples

• Data Input and Calculation

  • Access the AMGS calculator through the ACS GCI platform
  • Input all documented parameters in the appropriate calculator fields
  • Review color-coded results to identify areas with highest environmental impact
  • Iteratively adjust method parameters to optimize the AMGS value

• Interpretation and Optimization

  • Analyze which category (solvent health/safety, energy demand, or waste) contributes most significantly to the score
  • Develop optimization strategy targeting the highest impact category first
  • Validate that method performance remains acceptable after greenness improvements

Troubleshooting Notes:

• If the AMGS calculator returns unexpectedly high values, verify that all solvent volumes include preparatory and purification steps
• When method modifications are implemented to improve greenness, ensure system suitability criteria are still met
• For methods requiring exceptional sensitivity, focus optimization efforts on waste reduction and energy consumption rather than solvent selection

AMGS Within the Green Analytical Chemistry Landscape

The AMGS represents one of several metrics developed to assess method greenness within the broader context of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC). GAC focuses on mitigating the adverse effects of analytical activities on human safety, human health, and the environment [4]. Currently, there are 15 widely used GAC metrics, including the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Analytical GREEnness Calculator (AGREE), and AMGS, each with distinct characteristics, merits, and demerits [4].

A recent comparative analysis highlights that while numerous GAC metrics exist, many have specific limitations. Some metrics are restricted to particular analytical techniques, while others provide only qualitative assessment or require complex calculation processes [12]. The AMGS distinguishes itself by focusing specifically on chromatographic methods and incorporating both solvent impact and energy consumption into a single calculable score [5]. However, it should be noted that unlike some newer metrics, AMGS does not generate a pictogram to visually represent method greenness [12].

The development of green chemistry evaluation tools continues to evolve, with recent introductions like the Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods (GEMAM) aiming to address limitations of existing tools by providing both qualitative and quantitative information through a pictogram display [12]. These ongoing developments in assessment methodologies reflect the scientific community's continued commitment to enhancing environmental sustainability in analytical practices.

AMGS Assessment Workflow

Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Method Development

Implementing AMGS principles requires careful selection of reagents and materials that minimize environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance. The following table details key research reagent solutions aligned with green chemistry principles.

Table: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Methods

Reagent Category	Green Alternatives	Function	AMGS Impact
Extraction Solvents	Ethyl acetate, ethanol, cyclopentyl methyl ether	Sample preparation and compound extraction	Reduces health and environmental hazard scores
Chromatographic Solvents	Acetonitrile/ethanol blends, methanol/water	Mobile phase composition	Lowers environmental impact and safety concerns
Derivatization Agents	Water-soluble reagents, microwave-assisted	Analyte modification for detection	Minimizes hazardous waste generation
Precipitation Inhibitors	HPMCAS, HPMC polymers	Maintains supersaturation in SEDDS	Reduces organic solvent consumption
Calibration Standards	Aqueous-based formulations	Method calibration and quantification	Eliminates organic solvent waste from standards

The ongoing development of AMGS reflects the dynamic nature of green chemistry metrics and their increasing importance in sustainable science. The ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable continues to enhance the AMGS calculator, with planned updates including expansion to Gas Chromatography methods by early 2026 [5]. This directional development highlights the commitment to broadening the applicability of green chemistry assessment tools across analytical techniques.

The AMGS represents a practical implementation of green chemistry principles that aligns with the broader historical development of sustainable science. From its origins in the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 to its current institutionalization through the ACS GCI, green chemistry has evolved from a conceptual framework to a practical toolkit that includes metrics like AMGS [9]. The continued refinement of these tools addresses the growing need for standardized, quantifiable approaches to environmental assessment in analytical chemistry.

For researchers implementing AMGS, the metric provides both an assessment framework and an optimization pathway for developing more sustainable analytical methods. By integrating AMGS evaluation early in method development, scientists can make environmentally conscious decisions that reduce hazardous waste, decrease energy consumption, and minimize overall environmental impact while maintaining the analytical integrity required for pharmaceutical research and quality control.

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) is a comprehensive metric developed to evaluate and minimize the environmental impact of analytical methods, with a particular focus on chromatographic techniques used in pharmaceutical development. Conceived by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute (ACS GCI) Pharmaceutical Roundtable, the AMGS provides researchers with a standardized tool to benchmark and compare the sustainability of their analytical procedures [13] [5]. The primary objective of this metric is to raise awareness of environmental impacts and encourage the development of greener methods by providing a clear, quantifiable score where a lower AMGS value indicates a greener method [5].

The AMGS framework is particularly valuable in the pharmaceutical industry, where analytical chemistry plays a critical role in drug development and quality control. By integrating sustainability considerations early in the method development process, organizations can systematically reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining analytical integrity. The metric achieves this by evaluating three core components: the Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) profile of solvents, the cumulative energy demand of the method, and the volume of solvent waste generated [5] [14]. This application note provides detailed protocols for implementing the AMGS metric, enabling researchers to quantitatively assess and improve the greenness of their analytical methods.

Core Components of the AMGS Metric

The AMGS calculation integrates three fundamental components that collectively determine the environmental impact of an analytical method. Each component is quantified and weighted to produce a comprehensive score.

Table 1: Core Components of the AMGS Metric

Component	Description	Key Input Parameters	Measurement Approach
Solvent EHS Impact	Evaluates solvent toxicity and environmental hazards [15]	Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) scores; GHS hazard statements [15]	CHEM21 Solvent Selection Guide or similar systems; scores derived from GHS data and physical properties [15] [16]
Cumulative Energy Demand (CED)	Total energy for solvent production and disposal [13]	CED values (MJ/kg solvent) [13]	Lifecycle inventory data; accounts for energy from raw material extraction to solvent disposal
Instrument Energy Usage	Electricity consumed by analytical instrument [13]	Method runtime, instrument power consumption	Calculated from instrument power rating (kW) multiplied by analysis time (hours)
Solvent Waste	Volume of waste solvent generated per analysis [5]	Total solvent volume used per sample	Sum of mobile phase and sample preparation solvent volumes; incorporates system suitability test (SST) dilutions [5]

Solvent Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Profile

The solvent EHS assessment is a critical element of the AMGS, evaluating the impact of the solvents used throughout the analytical method. The CHEM21 Solvent Selection Guide is a widely adopted tool for this purpose, providing a standardized ranking system based on safety, health, and environmental criteria aligned with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) [15] [16]. The CHEM21 scoring system assigns a separate score from 1 (lowest hazard) to 10 (highest hazard) for each of the three categories:

• Safety Score: Derived primarily from the solvent's flash point, with additional points for low auto-ignition temperature (<200°C), high resistivity (>10⁸ ohm.m), and the ability to form explosive peroxides [15].
• Health Score: Based predominantly on the most stringent GHS H3xx statements (e.g., H330: fatal if inhaled, H341: suspected of causing genetic defects), with an additional point added if the boiling point is below 85°C (increased inhalation risk) [15].
• Environmental Score: Considers the solvent's volatility (boiling point) and associated GHS H4xx statements (e.g., H400: very toxic to aquatic life) [15].

These three scores are then combined to assign an overall solvent ranking of "Recommended," "Problematic," or "Hazardous" [15]. For the AMGS calculation, these categorical rankings or the underlying numerical scores are integrated to reflect the solvent's relative environmental and safety impact.

Energy Demand and Consumption

The AMGS metric incorporates energy consumption from two distinct sources: the energy embedded in the solvents used and the direct electrical energy consumed by the instrument during operation.

• Cumulative Energy Demand (CED): This represents the total energy required to produce and eventually dispose of a unit of solvent (typically in MJ/kg) [13]. It is a lifecycle-based concept that accounts for energy consumption from raw material extraction through manufacturing, transportation, and end-of-life treatment. Utilizing solvents with lower CED values directly contributes to a greener AMGS.
• Instrument Energy Usage: This component quantifies the direct electricity consumption of the chromatographic system (e.g., HPLC, UHPLC) during a single analytical run. It is a function of the instrument's power draw (in kW) and the method runtime (in hours). Shorter method times and energy-efficient instruments significantly reduce this component of the score [5].

Solvent Waste Generation

The volume of solvent waste generated per analysis is a straightforward but critical component. This includes all solvents used in the mobile phase and during sample preparation, such as dilution and extraction solvents [5]. The AMGS calculator specifically notes that the total volume should account for serial dilutions used in preparing system suitability test (SST) solutions [5]. Minimizing waste volume through method miniaturization, solvent recycling, or reducing scale is a direct and effective strategy for improving the AMGS.

AMGS Calculation Workflow

The process of calculating the Analytical Method Greenness Score follows a logical sequence where data from the analytical method is collected and processed through the AMGS algorithm. The workflow below visualizes this process from method parameters to the final score and its interpretation.

Protocol for AMGS Calculation

This protocol provides a step-by-step methodology for calculating the AMGS for a liquid chromatography method.

Materials and Software:

• AMGS Calculator (Web-based tool from ACS GCI PR)
• Chromatographic method details (solvents, flow rate, runtime, etc.)
• CHEM21 Solvent Selection Guide

Procedure:

• Gather Method Parameters:

  • Record the names and volumes of all solvents used in the mobile phase and for sample preparation/dilution.
  • Note the method runtime (in minutes).
  • Identify the instrument type (e.g., HPLC, UHPLC) and its typical power consumption, if known.
  • Calculate the total solvent waste volume per sample, including the mobile phase volume consumed during the run and any sample preparation solvents.

• Determine Solvent EHS Scores:

  • For each solvent used, consult the CHEM21 Solvent Selection Guide [15] [16].
  • Record the individual Safety, Health, and Environment (SHE) scores or the overall recommended/problematic/hazardous ranking.
  • The AMGS calculator will internally use these values to compute the solvent impact sub-score.

• Input Data into AMGS Calculator:

  • Access the AMGS calculator via the ACS GCI PR website [5] [14].
  • Enter the required data into the designated fields:
    • Solvent Section: Input solvent types and volumes.
    • Energy Section: Input method runtime and instrument type.
    • Waste Section: Input the total waste volume calculated in Step 1.
    • System Suitability: Include the total volume of dilutions if a serial dilution was performed for the SST [5].

• Execute Calculation and Interpret Results:

  • Run the calculation to generate the AMGS score. A lower percentage score indicates a greener method [5].
  • Analyze the color-coded output, which highlights which component (solvent EHS, energy, or waste) contributes most significantly to the score. Yellow and red indicators pinpoint areas with the greatest potential for improvement [5].

Case Study and Experimental Data

A recent study by AstraZeneca demonstrates the practical application of the AMGS in a industrial drug development context. The researchers utilized the AMGS to assess the current state of their analytical methods, influence standard practices, and create internal tools for trending data as a mode of continuous process verification [13]. This systematic approach allowed them to quantify the environmental benefits of method optimization and drive a cultural shift towards sustainable analytical practices within the organization.

Table 2: Exemplary AMGS Comparison for Chromatographic Methods

Method Parameter	Traditional HPLC Method	Optimized UHPLC Method	Notes and Impact
Column Dimensions	4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm	2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm	Miniaturization reduces solvent consumption and waste.
Flow Rate	1.0 mL/min	0.4 mL/min	Directly lowers solvent usage per unit time.
Primary Solvent	Acetonitrile (Problematic) [15]	Ethanol (Recommended) [15]	Switching to a CHEM21 "Recommended" solvent improves EHS profile.
Method Runtime	20 minutes	5 minutes	75% reduction significantly cuts instrument energy consumption.
Total Solvent Waste/Sample	20 mL	2 mL	90% reduction in waste volume due to smaller column and shorter runtime.
Calculated AMGS	Higher (Less Green)	Lower (Greener)	The optimized method achieves a superior sustainability profile.

The data in Table 2 illustrates how strategic modifications to an analytical method directly influence the core components of the AMGS. The transition from a traditional HPLC setup to an optimized UHPLC method results in substantial improvements across all evaluated domains: a better EHS profile via solvent substitution, reduced energy demand from a shorter runtime, and a drastic reduction in solvent waste generation through miniaturization [13].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Selecting appropriate reagents, particularly solvents, is fundamental to designing green analytical methods. The following table details key reagents and their roles within the AMGS framework.

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green Analytical Methods

Reagent/Material	Function in Analytical Method	Greenness Considerations (CHEM21 Guide)	Example Substitutions for Greener Profile
Acetonitrile	Common HPLC strong solvent.	Often ranked "Problematic" due to health (H312, H332) and environmental concerns [15] [16].	Substitute with Ethanol or Isopropanol, which are often "Recommended" and bio-derived [15] [16].
Methanol	HPLC solvent, extraction solvent.	Can be "Problematic" (H301, H311, H331) but often revised to "Recommended" with proper handling [15].	Ethanol is a less toxic alternative for some applications [15].
n-Hexane	Extraction solvent.	Typically "Hazardous" due to safety (H224) and health (H304, H361, H373) risks [16].	Heptane or Cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) may offer safer profiles [16].
Dichloromethane	Strong extraction solvent.	"Hazardous" due to health concerns (H351 - suspected carcinogen) [16].	Ethyl Acetate ("Recommended") is a commonly explored greener alternative [15].
Diethyl Ether	Extraction solvent.	"Hazardous" due to extreme flammability (H224) and peroxide formation risk [15].	Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) or Ethyl Acetate are generally safer options [15].
Ethyl Acetate	Extraction solvent, HPLC mobile phase.	Widely "Recommended" with noted flammability (H225) requiring standard precautions [15].	A versatile, greener solvent for multiple applications.
Water	HPLC weak solvent, extraction solvent.	The greenest solvent, with perfect SHE scores (1,1,1) [15].	Use as a primary solvent where method performance allows.
3,7-DMF	3,7-DMF, CAS:20950-52-1, MF:C17H14O4, MW:282.29 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
LEQ506	LEQ506, CAS:1204975-42-7, MF:C25H32N6O, MW:432.6 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) provides a robust, quantitative framework for assessing and improving the environmental sustainability of analytical methods in pharmaceutical research and development. By systematically evaluating the three core components of solvent EHS impact, energy demand, and waste generation, researchers can make informed decisions that significantly reduce the ecological footprint of their work. The provided protocols, data tables, and the standardized CHEM21 guide offer a practical toolkit for scientists to implement this metric effectively. As the industry moves towards greater sustainability, adopting tools like the AMGS is no longer optional but essential for driving innovation in green chemistry and minimizing the environmental impact of drug development.

How AMGS Complements Traditional Analytical Performance Metrics

The pharmaceutical industry is increasingly prioritizing sustainability, driven by awareness of environmental impacts associated with drug development and manufacturing [17]. Within this framework, Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a disciplined approach to minimize the environmental footprint of analytical techniques while maintaining data quality and reliability [18]. The fundamental challenge lies in balancing conventional method performance criteria—such as specificity, accuracy, and precision—with emerging environmental considerations [3].

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) represents a significant advancement in quantifying this balance. Developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute in collaboration with industry partners, AMGS provides a comprehensive, quantitative assessment of environmental impact across multiple dimensions [17]. Unlike traditional metrics that focus solely on technical performance, AMGS evaluates solvent energy consumption, environmental health and safety (EHS) characteristics, and instrument energy usage, providing a holistic sustainability profile for chromatographic and other analytical methods [17].

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS): Principles and Calculation

Fundamental Components

AMGS operates on a multi-factor assessment model that quantifies the environmental impact of analytical methods based on several key parameters. The score incorporates three primary components: solvent EHS considerations, solvent energy footprint, and instrument energy consumption [17]. This tripartite structure enables a balanced evaluation that accounts for both chemical and operational sustainability factors.

The solvent EHS score assesses environmental, health, and safety impacts of solvents used in analytical methods, penalizing hazardous substances while rewarding safer alternatives. The solvent energy score calculates energy consumed during solvent production and disposal, emphasizing lifecycle thinking. Meanwhile, the instrument energy score quantifies direct power consumption of analytical equipment during method operation, encouraging energy-efficient technologies and practices [17].

Calculation Methodology

AMGS employs a structured calculation framework that transforms raw method parameters into a comprehensive greenness score. The formula integrates the three component scores through weighted aggregation:

AMGS = (Solvent EHS Score + Solvent Energy Score + Instrument Energy Score) / 3

Each component score is calculated separately based on method-specific parameters. The solvent EHS score incorporates toxicity, flammability, and environmental impact data. The solvent energy score considers the energy intensity of solvent production and waste processing. The instrument energy score factors in power consumption rates, run times, and throughput efficiency [17]. This calculation yields a single numerical score that facilitates straightforward comparison between different analytical methods and their environmental performance.

Comparative Analysis: AMGS Versus Traditional Performance Metrics

Complementary Roles in Method Assessment

Traditional analytical performance metrics and AMGS serve distinct but complementary roles in comprehensive method evaluation. While conventional parameters ensure technical reliability and data quality, AMGS addresses environmental sustainability, together enabling more informed method selection and development decisions.

Table 1: Comparison of AMGS and Traditional Analytical Performance Metrics

Assessment Dimension	Traditional Metrics	AMGS	Complementary Relationship
Primary Focus	Data quality, reliability, regulatory compliance	Environmental impact, safety, sustainability	Ensures methods are both technically valid and environmentally responsible
Key Parameters	Accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, robustness	Solvent EHS, solvent energy, instrument energy consumption	Broadens assessment beyond technical performance to environmental footprint
Assessment Approach	Method validation protocols, system suitability testing	Multi-factor scoring of environmental parameters	Provides complementary perspective for holistic method characterization
Decision Support	Method capability for intended purpose	Environmental impact reduction opportunities	Balances technical and sustainability considerations in method selection
Regulatory Significance	Required for method approval	Emerging importance in environmental compliance	Addresses both product quality and corporate sustainability mandates

Integration in Pharmaceutical Development

The pharmaceutical industry presents a compelling case for AMGS implementation, where analytical methods are fundamental to quality control and regulatory compliance throughout drug development [17]. A case study of rosuvastatin calcium manufacturing illustrates the cumulative environmental impact of analytical methods when scaled across global production networks. With approximately 25 liquid chromatography analyses per batch and an estimated 1,000 batches produced annually, this single API consumes approximately 18,000 liters of mobile phase each year solely for chromatographic analysis [17].

This example underscores how AMGS complements traditional performance metrics by revealing environmental cost factors that remain invisible in conventional assessments. While system suitability tests and validation protocols ensure method reliability, AMGS quantifies the sustainability profile, enabling organizations to make more environmentally responsible choices without compromising data quality [17].

Experimental Protocols for AMGS Assessment

Protocol: Comprehensive AMGS Calculation for HPLC Methods

Principle: This protocol provides a standardized methodology for calculating the Analytical Method Greenness Score for High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) methods, enabling objective comparison of environmental performance across different analytical procedures.

Materials and Reagents:

• HPLC system with documented power consumption specifications
• Analytical columns specified in method documentation
• HPLC-grade solvents and reagents
• Method validation documentation
• Power consumption meter (optional)

Procedure:

• Solvent Inventory and Volumes
  • Record all solvents used in mobile phase preparation, including compositions and proportions
  • Calculate total solvent consumption per analysis based on flow rate and run time
  • Account for solvent usage in sample preparation and dilution steps
  • Document waste generation volumes, including column equilibration and shutdown steps

• Solvent EHS Assessment

  • Consult solvent safety data sheets for hazard classifications
  • Assign EHS penalties based on environmental impact, health effects, and safety hazards
  • Apply weighting factors for solvent volume used in the method
  • Calculate composite EHS score using established penalty point systems

• Solvent Energy Calculation

  • Determine energy intensity factors for each solvent (production and disposal)
  • Multiply solvent volumes by respective energy intensity factors
  • Sum energy components across all solvents used in the method
  • Normalize to energy per analysis basis

• Instrument Energy Consumption

  • Document HPLC system power rating from manufacturer specifications
  • Record actual method run time, including equilibration and re-equilibration
  • Calculate energy consumption per analysis (kWh)
  • For multi-sample sequences, factor in standby energy consumption

• AMGS Computation

  • Normalize each component score to a common scale (0-100)
  • Apply weighting factors if specified by organizational guidelines
  • Calculate final AMGS using the formula: (Solvent EHS + Solvent Energy + Instrument Energy) / 3
  • Document all assumptions and calculation parameters

Notes: For methods requiring sample derivation, include derivative reagent volumes and energies. For automated sequences, calculate average energy per sample based on full sequence runtime.

Workflow Visualization

Comparative Evaluation of Green Metrics

AMGS in Context with Other Assessment Tools

Multiple green assessment tools have emerged alongside AMGS, each with distinct approaches, advantages, and limitations. Understanding how AMGS complements these tools provides valuable context for its application in analytical method development.

Table 2: Comparison of AMGS with Other Green Assessment Metrics

Metric	Assessment Approach	Key Strengths	Key Limitations	Relationship to AMGS
AMGS	Multi-factor quantitative scoring of solvent EHS, solvent energy, instrument energy	Comprehensive, quantitative, specifically designed for chromatography	Limited to chromatographic methods, does not address sample preparation in detail	Reference standard for chromatographic methods
NEMI	Pictogram with four criteria (PBT, hazardous waste, corrosivity, waste volume)	Simple, visual representation	Qualitative only, limited discrimination between methods	AMGS provides quantitative refinement of NEMI concepts
Analytical Eco-Scale	Penalty point system subtracted from ideal score of 100	Semi-quantitative, incorporates reagent toxicity and energy	Does not specifically address instrument energy consumption	AMGS offers more specific focus on chromatographic parameters
GAPI	Multi-criteria pictogram with color-coded impact assessment	Comprehensive visual assessment of entire method	Qualitative assessment, limited numerical comparison	AMGS provides quantitative alternative with specific chromatography focus
AGREE	Radar chart visualization of 12 GAC principles	Comprehensive, visual, applicable to multiple techniques	Less specific to chromatographic method parameters	AMGS offers chromatography-specific complement to general AGREE assessment
GEMAM	Hexagonal pictogram scoring 21 criteria across 6 dimensions	Comprehensive, incorporates sample preparation and operator safety	Complex calculation process, newer with less established track record	AMGS provides simpler, chromatography-focused alternative

Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Implementing AMGS and improving analytical method greenness requires specific reagents and materials designed to reduce environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Green Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function	Green Chemistry Application
Water-Miscible Organic Solvents (e.g., ethanol, acetone)	Mobile phase component	Replace hazardous solvents like acetonitrile, reduce waste treatment complexity
Supercritical COâ‚‚	Extraction and chromatography solvent	Eliminate organic solvent use, easily recycled after use
Ionic Liquids	Alternative solvents for extraction	Low volatility reduces atmospheric emissions, tunable properties
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers	Selective extraction sorbents	Enable miniaturized extraction, reduce solvent consumption
Switchable Hydrophilicity Solvents	Extraction media	Solvents that can be switched between hydrophobic and hydrophilic forms for easy recovery and reuse
Bioprocessed Solvents (e.g., bioethanol, biodiesel)	Mobile phase components	Renewable sourcing reduces lifecycle environmental impact
Monolithic Columns	Chromatographic separation	Reduce backpressure, enable lower flow rates and faster separations
Core-Shell Particle Columns	Chromatographic separation	Enable high efficiency at lower pressures, reducing energy consumption
Green Derivatization Agents	Sample derivation for detection	Less toxic alternatives to hazardous derivatization reagents

Implementation Strategy: Integrating AMGS in Method Development and Validation

Organizational Adoption Framework

Successfully integrating AMGS into established analytical workflows requires a systematic implementation approach. Organizations should develop a phased adoption strategy that introduces AMGS assessment alongside traditional method validation protocols without disrupting existing quality systems.

The initial phase should focus on assessment and benchmarking of current method portfolio using AMGS criteria. This establishes baseline environmental performance and identifies priority areas for improvement. AstraZeneca's approach demonstrates this principle, where they "utilised this readily available tool to assess the current status, influence standard practices and create internal tools that trend data as a mode of continuous process verification" [17].

The second phase involves method redesign and optimization targeting the lowest-scoring AMGS components. This may include solvent substitution, method miniaturization, or instrument parameter optimization. The case study from AstraZeneca highlights how general methods with "poor sustainability credentials" can be identified and systematically improved [17].

The final phase establishes ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement, integrating AMGS tracking into routine method management. This ensures that environmental considerations remain central to analytical method lifecycle management alongside traditional performance metrics.

Decision Framework Visualization

The Analytical Method Greenness Score represents a critical evolution in analytical science, complementing traditional performance metrics by quantifying environmental sustainability. As the pharmaceutical industry advances toward ambitious goals like AstraZeneca's target of "carbon zero status for analytical laboratories by 2030," tools like AMGS provide the measurement framework necessary to track progress and guide improvement efforts [17].

By integrating AMGS assessment alongside traditional validation parameters, organizations can make more informed decisions that balance technical requirements with environmental responsibility. This integrated approach ensures that analytical methods support not only product quality and regulatory compliance but also corporate sustainability objectives and the broader imperative of environmental stewardship.

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) is a comparative metric designed to benchmark and evaluate the environmental sustainability of analytical methods, particularly in pharmaceutical development and drug discovery [5]. This calculator provides researchers with a straightforward, quantitative means to assess the greenness of their analytical processes, enabling informed decisions that reduce environmental impact while maintaining scientific rigor [14].

The AMGS was developed from a Microsoft Excel-based program initially created at Bristol-Myers Squibb and subsequently refined through collaboration by members of the American Chemical Society (ACS) Green Chemistry Institute (GCI) Pharmaceutical Roundtable's Analytical Chemistry team [5]. This pedigree ensures the tool is both practically grounded and scientifically validated for use within the pharmaceutical industry. The primary purpose of the AMGS is to raise environmental impact awareness during method development and encourage analysts to create greener methods by providing a clear, comparative score [5].

A fundamental principle of the AMGS is that a lower score indicates a greener method [5]. The metric synthesizes multiple environmental factors into a single value, including solvent health and safety profiles, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy consumption, and method solvent waste generation [4] [14]. This multi-factorial approach prevents the optimization of one environmental aspect at the expense of others, promoting truly sustainable method development.

Quantitative Environmental Benefits of AMGS Implementation

Core Environmental Metrics and Comparative Data

Implementation of AMGS enables organizations to quantify and manage the environmental footprint of their analytical operations. The table below summarizes key environmental metrics that can be optimized through AMGS-guided method development:

Table 1: Environmental Impact Metrics for Analytical Method Assessment

Metric Category	Specific Parameters	Measurement Approach	Impact of Greener Methods
Solvent Waste	Total solvent volume consumed; Waste generated per analysis	Volume accounting per method; Solvent recycling rates	Reduction in hazardous waste generation and disposal [5]
Energy Consumption	Instrument energy usage; Cumulative energy demand	kWh per analysis; Energy source (grid vs. renewable)	Lower power consumption through shortened run times and efficient instrumentation [5] [14]
Greenhouse Gas Emissions	COâ‚‚e emissions from solvent production and energy use	Lifecycle assessment calculations	Reduced carbon footprint through minimized energy and resource consumption [19]
Toxicity & Safety	Solvent health, safety, and environmental impact scores	Standardized solvent assessment tools	Improved workplace safety and reduced environmental toxicity [5]

Organizations that systematically track these metrics can demonstrate tangible environmental improvements. For instance, transitioning from traditional High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) to Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) or Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC) typically reduces solvent consumption by 50-90% and decreases analysis time by 60-80% while maintaining or improving analytical performance [14]. These methodological improvements directly translate to reduced environmental impact across all metrics captured by the AMGS calculation.

Economic Advantages of Green Method Implementation

The business case for AMGS implementation extends beyond environmental benefits to deliver substantial economic value through multiple pathways:

Table 2: Economic Benefits of AMGS Implementation

Economic Benefit Category	Specific Financial Impacts	Implementation Example
Operational Cost Reduction	Lower solvent purchase costs; Reduced waste disposal expenses; Decreased energy bills	SFC methods typically use <10% of the solvent required by normal-phase HPLC, directly cutting material and waste management costs [14]
Regulatory Compliance	Minimized regulatory burden; Simplified permitting; Reduced compliance monitoring	Methods with greener solvent selections may fall under higher thresholds for hazardous waste reporting [19]
Productivity Gains	Higher sample throughput; Reduced analyst time per sample; Faster method development	UHPLC methods with shorter run times enable more analyses per instrument per day, delaying capital equipment investments [14]
Innovation & Reputation	Enhanced corporate sustainability profile; Stronger green credentials; Competitive advantage	Public commitment to green chemistry principles can strengthen brand position and attract sustainability-conscious partners [20]

The economic argument is strengthened by recognizing that the "grow now, clean up later" approach has been widely discredited by experience across multiple industries, often resulting in rapidly escalating external costs from accumulated pollution damage and substantial investments in remediation [20]. Proactive environmental management through tools like AMGS helps organizations avoid these downstream costs while capturing immediate operational efficiencies.

AMGS Calculation Protocol and Methodology

Step-by-Step Calculation Procedure

The AMGS calculator provides a systematic approach to evaluating analytical methods. Follow this standardized protocol to ensure consistent, comparable results:

• Method Documentation: Record all relevant method parameters including instrument type, flow rate, run time, column dimensions, and injection volume [5].
• Solvent System Identification: Document the complete mobile phase composition, including all solvents and their percentages throughout the chromatographic run. Note any solvent recycling or recovery practices [5].
• Sample Preparation Accounting: Include all solvents and materials used in sample preparation, standard solutions, and system suitability testing. For serial dilutions, provide the total volume of all dilutions used to make the final solution [5].
• Energy Consumption Assessment: Calculate instrument energy usage based on run time and instrument power specifications. Shorter run times generally reduce energy consumption [5].
• Data Input and Calculation: Enter all collected data into the AMGS calculator. The tool will factor solvent health, safety, environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste to generate the composite score [5] [4].
• Results Interpretation: Review the color-coded output, which highlights areas for potential improvement. Yellow and red indicators signal opportunities to optimize specific method parameters [5].

Diagram: AMGS Calculation Workflow

Experimental Design for Method Comparison

When evaluating multiple analytical methods for the same application, employ this standardized experimental protocol to ensure valid AMGS comparisons:

• Define Analytical Requirements: Establish fixed method performance criteria including resolution, sensitivity, precision, and accuracy that all methods must meet.
• Develop Parallel Methods: Create multiple method options that all meet the analytical requirements but employ different approaches (e.g., varied instrumentation, solvent systems, or run times).
• Calculate Individual AMGS Values: Apply the AMGS calculation procedure to each qualified method.
• Compare Scores: Rank methods by their AMGS values, recognizing that lower scores indicate greener methods while ensuring all maintained the required analytical performance [5].
• Optimize Leading Candidates: Use the color-coded AMGS feedback to further refine the most promising methods, focusing on parameters indicated as high-impact (yellow or red indicators).

This systematic comparison enables evidence-based selection of the greenest viable method while maintaining analytical integrity.

Implementation Framework for AMGS in Research Organizations

Organizational Integration Strategy

Successful AMGS implementation requires both technical adoption and organizational commitment. The following workflow outlines a structured approach for integrating AMGS into existing research and development processes:

Diagram: AMGS Organizational Implementation Process

Effective implementation mirrors environmental management approaches used in other industrial sectors, where dedicated committees focus on associated legal liabilities, discrete remediation projects, and addressing environmental risks from business units [19]. Similar governance structures can support AMGS integration within research organizations.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The following table details key materials and their optimized selections for reducing AMGS in analytical method development:

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Greener Analytical Methods

Material Category	Green Alternatives	Function	Environmental Advantage
Chromatographic Solvents	Ethanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, supercritical COâ‚‚	Mobile phase composition; Sample preparation	Lower toxicity, improved biodegradability, reduced environmental persistence [5]
Extraction Solvents	Water (at elevated temperatures), bio-based solvents, solvent-free extraction	Sample preparation and analyte extraction	Reduced hazardous waste generation, safer workplace environment [5]
Derivatization Reagents	Water-compatible reagents, reduced toxicity catalysts	Analyte chemical modification for detection	Minimized generation of hazardous byproducts [4]
Separation Columns	UHPLC columns (sub-2μm particles), core-shell technology	Chromatographic separation	Enables faster separations with lower solvent consumption [14]
Evogliptin tartrate	Evogliptin tartrate, CAS:1222102-51-3, MF:C23H32F3N3O9, MW:551.5 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
Clozapine-d4	Clozapine-d4, CAS:204395-52-8, MF:C18H19ClN4, MW:330.8 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

Environmental and Economic Impact Assessment

Comprehensive Benefit Analysis

Systematic implementation of AMGS-guided methods generates compounding environmental and economic benefits:

• Accumulated Resource Savings: The cumulative impact of multiple method optimizations across an organization can yield substantial reductions in solvent purchasing, waste disposal costs, and energy consumption. One study found that using greener alternatives could result in 25% or more GHG emissions mitigation benefit when compared with standard approaches [19].
• Risk Mitigation: By reducing reliance on hazardous solvents and minimizing waste generation, organizations decrease their environmental liability and potential regulatory exposure [19] [20].
• Innovation Acceleration: The discipline of method greening often stimulates procedural innovations that deliver both environmental and operational benefits. One company reported designing processes that achieve over 99% conversion of materials to saleable finished goods while generating no process wastewater [19].
• Strategic Alignment: AMGS implementation supports corporate sustainability commitments and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting requirements, increasingly important for market positioning and stakeholder relations [19].

Limitations and Future Developments

The current version of the AMGS calculator is designed for determining liquid chromatography and SFC greenness scores only [5]. The ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable's Analytical Focus Team is actively working on improvements to the tool, with an updated version supporting Gas Chromatography (GC) methods expected by early 2026 [5].

Researchers should recognize that AMGS is intended as a comparative metric to guide method selection during development, not as an absolute measure of method greenness or as a means to reject a given method based solely on the finite score [5]. The tool should be used in conjunction with traditional method validation criteria to ensure both analytical and environmental performance.

Forward-looking organizations will benefit from establishing AMGS baselines for their current methods and tracking improvements over time as they implement greener alternatives. This approach demonstrates continuous improvement and contributes to broader corporate sustainability objectives while delivering measurable economic benefits through more efficient resource utilization.

The field of analytical chemistry has undergone a significant paradigm shift with the emergence of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), which aims to mitigate the environmental impacts of analytical processes. This evolution addresses the paradox that while analytical chemistry plays a crucial role in environmental monitoring, its own practices—characterized by toxic solvents, high energy consumption, and substantial waste generation—contribute to environmental degradation [21] [22]. Within this context, the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) has emerged as a specialized metric to benchmark and compare the environmental performance of analytical methods, particularly in chromatography [5].

The development of AMGS represents a practical implementation of broader green chemistry principles into analytical practice. Originally developed from a Microsoft Excel-based program at Bristol-Myers Squibb and further refined by the American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable (ACS GCI PR), AMGS provides a quantitative framework for assessing method greenness [5]. This metric specifically factors solvent health, safety, environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste to provide a comprehensive environmental profile [5]. The calculated score serves as a comparative tool, where a lower AMGS value indicates a greener method, enabling scientists to make informed decisions during method development that align with sustainability goals.

The Theoretical Evolution: From Green to White Analytical Chemistry

Historical Development of Green Chemistry in Analysis

The conceptual foundation for GAC was established with Paul Anastas and John Warner's formulation of the twelve principles of green chemistry in 1998 [22]. These principles provided the basis for what would later become the twelve principles of Green Analytical Chemistry, which aim to avoid adverse environmental impacts without compromising analytical quality and efficiency [22]. The movement gained institutional support with the launch of the American Chemical Society-Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable (ACS-GCIPR) in 2005, followed by the first seminal publication specifically addressing Green Analytical Chemistry in 2006 [22].

Early green chemistry metrics focused primarily on waste reduction, with Sheldon's E-Factor being one of the most prominent examples. This simple metric calculates the total weight of waste generated per kilogram of product [23]. As shown in Table 1, E-Factor values vary significantly across industry sectors, with pharmaceutical manufacturing typically generating 25-100+ kg of waste per kg of product due to multi-stage syntheses and high-purity requirements [23].

Table 1: E-Factor Values Across Chemical Industry Sectors [23]

Industry Sector	Product Tonnage	E-Factor (kg Waste/kg Product)
Oil refining	10⁶-10⁸	<0.1
Bulk chemicals	10⁴-10⁶	<1.0 to 5.0
Fine chemicals	10²-10⁴	5.0 to >50
Pharmaceutical industry	10-10³	25 to >100

Expansion to White Analytical Chemistry (WAC)

While GAC focused primarily on environmental aspects, a more comprehensive approach has emerged called White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), which addresses observed limitations in practically applying GAC principles [22]. A primary concern was the potential trade-off between environmental sustainability and analytical performance, where strict adherence to GAC principles could sometimes lead to compromised sensitivity, precision, or accuracy [22].

WAC introduces an integrated approach incorporating three complementary dimensions, visualized using an RGB color model:

• Red Criteria: Represents analytical performance parameters, including accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and reproducibility [22].
• Green Criteria: Encompasses environmental sustainability factors, including waste generation, energy consumption, and reagent toxicity [22].
• Blue Criteria: Addresses practical and economic considerations, such as cost-efficiency, operational simplicity, and time requirements [22].

The combination of these three dimensions aims to achieve "method whiteness" - an indicator of how well an approach satisfies sustainability, analytical capability, and practical applicability criteria simultaneously [22]. This holistic framework aligns analytical method development with the broader concept of sustainable development, where environmental responsibility coexists with technical excellence and practical feasibility.

Figure 1: Evolution from Green Chemistry to White Analytical Chemistry and the positioning of AMGS within this framework.

AMGS Fundamentals and Calculation Methodology

Core Components of the AMGS Metric

The Analytical Method Greenness Score provides a structured approach to evaluate the environmental impact of chromatographic methods. According to the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable, AMGS calculation incorporates three primary categories [5]:

• Solvent Impact: Evaluates solvent health, safety, and environmental factors, along with cumulative energy demand.
• Instrument Energy: Assesses energy consumption based on instrument type and method runtime.
• Method Solvent Waste: Calculates waste generation considering flow rate, collection time, and solvent composition.

The AMGS calculator employs color coding (yellow and red) to highlight areas contributing most significantly to the overall score, providing clear indicators for potential methodological improvements [5]. For instance, a red indicator for instrument energy would suggest that reducing method runtime could enhance greenness.

Practical Implementation Protocol

Protocol: Calculating AMGS for Liquid Chromatography Methods

Objective: To determine the Analytical Method Greenness Score for HPLC or UPLC methods to enable environmental impact assessment and comparison.

Materials:

• AMGS calculator (available through ACS GCI PR)
• Chromatographic method parameters
• Solvent consumption data
• Instrument specifications

Procedure:

• Data Collection:

  • Record mobile phase composition including all solvents and additives
  • Document flow rate (mL/min) and method runtime (minutes)
  • Note injection volume and any needle wash compositions
  • Identify instrument type (HPLC, UPLC, or SFC)

• System Suitability Solution Preparation:

  • Include total volume of all dilutions when preparing serial dilutions
  • For methods using both resolution and sensitivity solutions, include total volume for both in the sensitivity solution entry [5]

• Calculator Input:

  • Enter solvent volumes and compositions in appropriate fields
  • Input instrument type and method duration
  • Specify collection time for waste calculation
  • Include all system suitability testing parameters

• Score Interpretation:

  • Review total AMGS (lower scores indicate greener methods)
  • Identify category-specific color codes to pinpoint improvement areas
  • Compare with alternative method configurations

• Method Optimization:

  • Implement changes to address high-impact categories
  • Recalculate AMGS for modified methods
  • Balance environmental improvements with analytical performance

Notes: The current AMGS calculator version supports liquid chromatography and SFC methods only, with GC compatibility planned for 2026 [5]. The tool is intended as a comparative metric during method development rather than an absolute measure of greenness.

Case Studies: AMGS in Pharmaceutical Analysis

Application in Chromatographic Method Greening

Recent research demonstrates the practical application of AMGS in developing greener chromatographic methods. In one study, researchers utilized in silico modeling to significantly improve method greenness while maintaining analytical performance [24]. By mapping AMGS across the entire separation landscape, scientists could simultaneously develop methods based on both performance and greenness criteria.

A key application involved replacing fluorinated mobile phase additives with chlorinated alternatives, which reduced the AMGS from 9.46 to 4.49 while improving resolution from fully overlapped peaks to a resolution of 1.40 [24]. In another example, researchers replaced acetonitrile with environmentally friendlier methanol, reducing the AMGS from 7.79 to 5.09 while preserving critical resolution [24]. These examples demonstrate how AMGS provides quantitative guidance for solvent selection in method development.

Table 2: AMGS Improvement Through Method Modifications [24]

Modification Type	Original AMGS	Improved AMGS	Performance Impact
Fluorinated to chlorinated mobile phase additive	9.46	4.49	Resolution improved from overlapped to 1.40
Acetonitrile to methanol replacement	7.79	5.09	Critical resolution preserved
Preparative chromatography optimization	Not specified	Not specified	2.5× increased loading capacity

Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment Protocol

Protocol: Greenness and Whiteness Assessment of Analytical Methods

Objective: To comprehensively evaluate the environmental, functional, and practical characteristics of analytical methods using multiple metrics including AMGS, AGREE, and White Analytical Chemistry principles.

Materials:

• Fully developed analytical method
• Complete method parameters and validation data
• AGREE and AGREEprep calculators
• WAC assessment template

Procedure:

• Method Characterization:

  • Document all reagents, volumes, and energy requirements
  • Record waste generation and disposal methods
  • Compile analytical performance data (accuracy, precision, sensitivity, linearity)
  • Document practical considerations (cost, time, operational complexity)

• AMGS Assessment:

  • Calculate AMGS per Protocol 3.2
  • Identify primary contributors to environmental impact
  • Note opportunities for improvement

• Complementary Greenness Metrics:

  • Calculate AGREE score: Evaluates 12 GAC principles using a 0-1 scale [25]
  • Calculate AGREEprep score: Focuses specifically on sample preparation environmental impact [25]
  • Determine Analytical Eco-Scale: Assigns penalty points for non-green parameters [26]

• White Analytical Chemistry Assessment:

  • Evaluate Red (Analytical) Criteria: Score method performance on accuracy, precision, sensitivity, selectivity, linearity, and robustness
  • Evaluate Green (Environmental) Criteria: Assess energy consumption, waste generation, reagent toxicity, and operator safety
  • Evaluate Blue (Practical) Criteria: Rate cost-effectiveness, time efficiency, operational simplicity, and equipment availability [22]
  • Calculate overall whiteness score based on RGB balance

• Interpretation and Optimization:

  • Compare scores across multiple metrics
  • Identify consistent strengths and weaknesses
  • Implement iterative improvements targeting deficient areas
  • Validate that optimizations maintain analytical performance

Application Example: In a study quantifying gabapentin and methylcobalamin, researchers employed this multi-metric approach, obtaining an AGREE score of 0.70, AGREEprep score of 0.71, and Analytical Eco-Scale of 80, confirming superior greenness while maintaining excellent analytical performance [26].

Advanced Applications: In Silico Modeling for Greener Methods

Computational Approach to Green Method Development

A significant advancement in green analytical chemistry is the application of in silico modeling to reduce the environmental impact of method development itself. Traditional method optimization typically involves extensive trial-and-error experimentation, consuming large volumes of solvents and energy while generating substantial waste [24]. Computer-assisted method development addresses this issue by enabling rapid, accurate exploration of separation landscapes without physical experimentation.

This approach allows scientists to map AMGS across the entire methodological parameter space, identifying regions that offer optimal balance between analytical performance and environmental impact [24]. The methodology employs sophisticated algorithms to predict chromatographic behavior under various conditions, significantly reducing the number of experimental runs required for method development.

In Silico Screening Protocol

Protocol: Computer-Assisted Green Method Development

Objective: To employ in silico modeling for developing chromatographic methods with minimized environmental impact while maintaining performance standards.

Materials:

• Chromatographic modeling software (e.g., DryLab, ChromSword)
• Compound physicochemical properties
• AMGS calculation tool
• HPLC/UPLC system for verification

Procedure:

• Initial Parameter Definition:

  • Input molecular structures and properties of analytes
  • Define screening boundaries for method parameters (pH, gradient profile, temperature, solvent composition)
  • Set analytical performance requirements (resolution, retention, peak symmetry)

• In Silico Screening:

  • Execute computational simulations across parameter space
  • Identify regions meeting analytical performance criteria
  • Calculate AMGS for all promising method conditions
  • Select candidates balancing performance and greenness

• Experimental Verification:

  • Physically test top method candidates (typically 3-5)
  • Compare experimental results with predictions
  • Refine models if necessary based on experimental data

• Greenness Optimization:

  • Implement minor adjustments to further reduce environmental impact
  • Verify maintained performance after optimizations
  • Document final method parameters and greenness scores

• Method Validation:

  • Perform validation according to regulatory requirements
  • Confirm method robustness under nominal conditions
  • Document sustainability metrics alongside performance characteristics

Case Study Application: Researchers using this approach demonstrated a 2.5× increase in active pharmaceutical ingredient loading in preparative chromatography, resulting in 2.5× fewer replicates needed during purification [24]. This application highlights how in silico modeling can identify opportunities to significantly reduce resource consumption in analytical and preparative workflows.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Reagent/Material	Function	Green Alternatives	Considerations
Acetonitrile (HPLC grade)	Reverse-phase mobile phase modifier	Methanol, ethanol, acetone	Methanol reduces environmental impact (AMGS: 7.79→5.09) [24]
Fluorinated mobile phase additives	Peak shape modification for basic compounds	Chlorinated additives, ammonium salts	Chlorinated alternatives reduce AMGS (9.46→4.49) [24]
Concentrated acids (HNO₃, HCl)	Sample digestion for elemental analysis	Diluted acid mixtures, alternative extractants	Ultrasound-assisted extraction with diluted acids reduces toxicity [25]
Phosphate buffers	Mobile phase buffer for pH control	Volatile buffers (ammonium formate/acetate)	Reduces environmental persistence; compatibility with MS detection
Chlorinated solvents (dichloromethane, chloroform)	Extraction and normal-phase chromatography	Ethyl acetate, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), heptane/ethanol mixtures	Reduces toxicity and environmental persistence
Derivatization reagents	Analyte functionalization for detection	Direct detection methods, minimal derivatization	Eliminates reagent use and additional waste streams
Irbesartan-d4	Irbesartan-d4, CAS:1216883-23-6, MF:C25H28N6O, MW:432.6 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
Umbelliferone-d5	Umbelliferone-d5, CAS:1215373-23-1, MF:C9H6O3, MW:167.17 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

The evolution from Green Chemistry to Green Analytical Chemistry represents a significant shift in how the analytical community conceptualizes method development and implementation. Within this framework, the Analytical Method Greenness Score provides a practical, quantitative tool for assessing and improving the environmental profile of chromatographic methods. As the field advances, several emerging trends are shaping the future of sustainable analytical practices:

The integration of White Analytical Chemistry principles acknowledges that environmental sustainability must be balanced with analytical performance and practical feasibility [22]. This holistic approach recognizes that excessively focusing on environmental metrics alone may lead to analytically inadequate or practically unworkable methods. The RGB model offers a more comprehensive framework for method evaluation and selection.

Computational approaches like in silico modeling are revolutionizing method development by dramatically reducing the resource intensity of the optimization process [24]. These tools enable scientists to explore methodological parameter spaces virtually before conducting minimal verification experiments, significantly reducing solvent consumption, waste generation, and energy use during development.

Looking forward, the proposed Green Financing for Analytical Chemistry (GFAC) model aims to address implementation barriers by creating dedicated funding mechanisms for sustainable analytical innovation [22]. This financial infrastructure could accelerate the adoption of green practices by offsetting initial investment costs and supporting research into next-generation sustainable analytical technologies.

In conclusion, AMGS represents both a practical assessment tool and a symbolic manifestation of the analytical chemistry community's commitment to sustainability. As part of an integrated assessment strategy that includes multiple green metrics and White Analytical Chemistry principles, AMGS provides valuable guidance for developing analytical methods that meet today's performance requirements while preserving resources for future generations. The continued evolution and adoption of these frameworks will be essential for aligning analytical practices with the broader goals of sustainable development and environmental stewardship.

Applying AMGS: A Step-by-Step Guide to Method Assessment and Implementation

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) calculator is a metric tool developed by the American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable (ACS GCI PR) to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of analytical methods used in drug development [5]. This calculator provides a quantitative score where a lower AMGS value indicates a greener method, integrating assessments of solvent health, safety, environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste [14]. The primary purpose of the AMGS is to raise environmental impact awareness among analysts and encourage the development of greener chromatographic methods during the method development process, rather than serving as an absolute measure for method rejection [5]. Currently, this version of the calculator is designed for evaluating liquid chromatography (LC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) methods, with support for gas chromatography (GC) planned for a future release around 2026 [5].

AMGS Input Parameters and Data Requirements

To calculate the Analytical Method Greenness Score, users must provide specific data inputs that the calculator processes into a composite metric. The following table summarizes the core input parameters and their respective data requirements.

Table 1: Core Input Parameters for the AMGS Calculator

Parameter Category	Specific Data Requirements	Purpose in Greenness Assessment
Solvent Information	Identity and volumes of all solvents used in the method [5]	Evaluates health, safety, and environmental impact of solvents [14]
System Suitability Test (SST)	Total volume of dilutions for sensitivity solutions, including serial dilution volumes [5]	Accounts for waste generated during method validation and quality control steps
Instrument Energy	Method run time and instrument type (HPLC, UHPLC, SFC) [5]	Calculates cumulative energy demand during method execution [14]
Method Waste	Total solvent waste generated throughout the analytical process [5]	Assesses environmental footprint and resource efficiency

The AMGS calculator employs color-coding (yellow and red) in its output to highlight areas where the method could be improved, such as high instrument energy consumption that could be reduced by shortening the method run time [5]. This visual guidance helps analysts identify specific aspects of their methods that contribute most significantly to the environmental impact and prioritize optimization efforts accordingly.

Experimental Protocol for AMGS Assessment

Sample Preparation and System Suitability Documentation

• Record all solvents: Document every solvent used in the analytical method, including those for sample preparation, mobile phase composition, and system cleaning [5].
• Calculate total solvent volumes: Quantify the volumes of each solvent consumed throughout the entire analytical process, from sample preparation to final analysis.
• Document system suitability preparation: For system suitability tests (SST), precisely record the preparation process. When serial dilution is used, include the total volume of all dilutions made to achieve the final concentration [5].
• Account for multiple solutions: If both resolution and sensitivity solutions are used, include the total volume for both in the sensitivity solution entry of the calculator [5].

Instrumental Method Parameters and Data Collection

• Method duration: Record the total chromatographic run time per injection, including equilibration time if applicable.
• Instrument type: Specify the chromatography platform (e.g., HPLC, UHPLC, SFC) as different systems have varying energy consumption profiles [14].
• Data collection: Execute the analytical method and collect all relevant performance data to ensure the greenness assessment is based on a functionally valid method.

Data Input and Score Calculation

• Input data into calculator: Enter all collected solvent, waste, and instrument data into the designated fields of the AMGS calculator.
• Generate AMGS score: The calculator will compute a composite score that reflects the method's overall environmental impact.
• Interpret color-coded results: Analyze the output to identify which categories (solvent health, safety, environmental impact, energy demand) contribute most significantly to the score, guided by the yellow and red highlighting [5].

Figure 1: AMGS assessment workflow, illustrating the sequence from data collection through score interpretation.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Implementing the AMGS calculator and developing greener analytical methods requires specific materials and reagents. The following table details key research reagent solutions and their functions in the context of green chromatography.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Chromatographic Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function in Green Method Development	Green Chemistry Considerations
Alternative Solvents	Replace hazardous solvents with safer alternatives (e.g., ethanol, ethyl acetate) [4]	Reduces health, safety, and environmental impact scores in AMGS calculation
Solvent Blends	Optimize mobile phase compositions for efficiency and lower toxicity	Minimizes waste generation and environmental persistence
Reference Standards	For system suitability testing and method calibration [5]	Requires accurate documentation of dilution volumes for waste accounting
Sample Preparation Materials	(e.g., solid-phase extraction cartridges, filtration devices)	Can impact number of procedural steps and overall waste generation
Green Solvent Selector Tools	Databases and tools to identify solvents with preferable EHS profiles	Informs solvent selection prior to method development to optimize AMGS
2-Hydroxyestrone-d4	2-Hydroxyestrone-d4, CAS:81586-97-2, MF:C18H22O3, MW:290.4 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Valproic acid-d4	Valproic acid-d4, MF:C8H16O2, MW:148.24 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

The AMGS calculator provides a standardized, multi-factorial approach to quantify the environmental impact of analytical methods, specifically targeting liquid and supercritical fluid chromatography techniques. By systematically addressing the input parameters for solvents, system suitability tests, instrument energy, and method waste, researchers can generate meaningful greenness scores that enable comparative assessment between different methodological approaches. The experimental protocol outlined in this document offers a structured pathway for consistent application of the calculator, while the essential reagent solutions highlight practical starting points for method optimization. As the field of green analytical chemistry continues to evolve, tools like the AMGS calculator play a crucial role in promoting environmental awareness and encouraging the adoption of more sustainable practices in analytical laboratories, particularly within the pharmaceutical industry where method reproducibility and environmental impact are of paramount concern.

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) is a comprehensive metric developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute (ACS GCI) in collaboration with industry partners to evaluate the environmental impact of analytical methods, particularly in chromatography [13] [5]. A critical component of this assessment is the Instrument Energy Score, which quantifies the energy consumption of the analytical equipment throughout the method's lifecycle. This application note provides detailed protocols for calculating this score, with specific focus on the relationship between flow rate, run time, and instrument type in liquid chromatography (LC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) systems [5]. Proper calculation of these parameters enables researchers to optimize method conditions to reduce cumulative energy demand—a key factor in improving the overall greenness profile of analytical procedures in pharmaceutical development [13].

Theoretical Framework: Energy Consumption in Chromatographic Systems

Fundamental Relationships Between Flow Rate, Run Time, and Energy Use

Chromatographic instrument energy consumption follows a predictable relationship with operational parameters. The total energy demand (Etotal) for a single analytical run can be conceptualized as the sum of baseline energy (Ebase) required to maintain instrument readiness and operational energy (E_op) consumed during active analysis. The mathematical relationship can be expressed as:

Etotal = Ebase + E_op

Where Ebase is relatively constant for a given instrument type, and Eop is directly influenced by flow rate (F) and run time (T). Higher flow rates typically require greater pumping power, following a generally proportional relationship, though the exact correlation varies by instrument design and manufacturer [5]. Similarly, longer run times directly increase energy consumption proportionally, making method duration a critical variable in greenness assessment [13].

Instrument-Specific Energy Profiles

Different chromatographic systems exhibit distinct energy consumption patterns based on their design and operational requirements. The upcoming AMGS calculator update scheduled for early 2026 will extend these calculation capabilities to Gas Chromatography (GC) methods [5].

Table 1: Characteristic Energy Consumption Patterns by Instrument Type

Instrument Type	Primary Energy Contributors	Flow Rate Dependency	Run Time Sensitivity
HPLC	Pump, column oven, detector	High	High
UPLC/UHPLC	High-pressure pump, detector	Very High	Medium-High
SFC	Pump, back pressure regulator, COâ‚‚ heater	Medium	Medium
GC	Oven, injector, detector	N/A (gas flow)	High

Experimental Protocols for Energy Score Calculation

Protocol 1: Measuring Flow Rate and Run Time Parameters

Purpose: To standardize the measurement of flow rate and run time for accurate energy score calculation in AMGS assessment.

Materials and Equipment:

• Calibrated chromatographic system (HPLC, UPLC, or SFC)
• Analytical balance (±0.1 mg accuracy)
• Stopwatch or automated timer
• AMGS calculator tool (digital platform)
• Solvent collection vessels
• Personal protective equipment (safety glasses, gloves, lab coat)

Procedure:

• System Preparation:
  • Ensure the chromatographic system is properly calibrated and maintained according to manufacturer specifications.
  • Prime all lines with the mobile phase to be used in the method.

• Flow Rate Verification:

  • Set the method to the desired flow rate (e.g., 1.0 mL/min for HPLC).
  • Place a pre-weighed collection vessel at the waste line outlet.
  • Start the pump and simultaneously begin timing.
  • Collect effluent for exactly 10 minutes.
  • Weigh the collection vessel and calculate the mass of solvent collected.
  • Convert mass to volume using the solvent's density at room temperature.
  • Calculate actual flow rate: Volume (mL) / Time (min) = Actual Flow Rate (mL/min).
  • Repeat this process three times and calculate the average.

• Run Time Documentation:

  • Define run time as the interval from injection to the final programmed return to initial conditions.
  • For gradient methods, include the re-equilibration time in the total run time.
  • Record the run time directly from the chromatographic data system.

• Data Integration:

  • Input the verified flow rate and run time values into the AMGS calculator.
  • The calculator automatically computes the Instrument Energy Score based on these parameters combined with instrument-specific energy profiles [5].

Troubleshooting Tips:

• If measured flow rate deviates >5% from set point, check for pump malfunctions or solvent degassing issues.
• For methods with variable flow rates, calculate a time-weighted average flow rate.
• Ensure consistent ambient temperature during flow rate verification as viscosity changes affect flow rates.

Protocol 2: Determining Instrument-Specific Energy Coefficients

Purpose: To establish the relationship between operational parameters and actual energy consumption for different instrument types.

Materials and Equipment:

• Chromotographic instrument to be tested
• calibrated power meter (e.g., Kill A Watt or equivalent)
• Data logging software
• Standard reference method
• Environmental monitoring equipment (temperature, humidity)

Procedure:

• Baseline Power Measurement:
  • Connect the instrument to the power meter.
  • Turn on the instrument but do not start any method.
  • Record the power consumption every 30 seconds for 60 minutes.
  • Calculate the average baseline power (P_base) in watts.

• Operational Power Profile:

  • Program a reference method with standardized parameters.
  • Start power monitoring, then initiate the method.
  • Record power consumption at 10-second intervals throughout the run.
  • Note the power spikes during specific events (pump engagement, detector activation).
  • Calculate average operational power (P_op) during the active method.

• Flow Rate Power Relationship:

  • Run a series of methods identical in all aspects except flow rate.
  • Use at least five different flow rates spanning the instrument's operational range.
  • For each flow rate, record the average power consumption during pumping.
  • Plot power versus flow rate to establish the instrument-specific relationship.

• Data Analysis:

  • Calculate the energy coefficient for flow rate (EC_F) as the slope of the power-flow rate relationship.
  • Determine the run time multiplier (EC_T) as the proportional relationship between time and energy use.
  • These coefficients can be used to predict energy consumption for various method conditions [5].

Data Presentation and Calculation Models

Quantitative Relationships for Energy Score Prediction

The Instrument Energy Score within the AMGS framework is calculated using instrument-specific coefficients that incorporate both flow rate and run time parameters [5]. While the exact algorithm is proprietary to the ACS GCI AMGS calculator, the general relationship can be expressed as:

Instrument Energy Score = f(F, T, I)

Where:

• F = Flow rate (mL/min)
• T = Total run time (minutes)
• I = Instrument-specific coefficients (accounting for pump efficiency, detector types, and auxiliary systems)

Table 2: Exemplary Energy Consumption by Flow Rate and Run Time Combinations

Flow Rate (mL/min)	Run Time (min)	Relative Energy Consumption	AMGS Contribution
0.2	10	Low	Favorable
0.5	15	Low-Medium	Acceptable
1.0	20	Medium	Moderate
1.5	30	High	Unfavorable
2.0	40	Very High	Unfavorable

Workflow for Energy Score Optimization

The following diagram illustrates the decision-making process for minimizing the Instrument Energy Score through parameter optimization:

Diagram 1: Energy Score Optimization Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Materials for AMGS Energy Assessment Studies

Item	Function	Application Notes
AMGS Calculator	Computes overall greenness score	Digital tool incorporating instrument energy, solvent health, safety, environmental impact, and cumulative energy demand [5]
Calibrated Power Meter	Measures actual instrument electricity consumption	Critical for establishing instrument-specific energy coefficients; accuracy of ±1% recommended
Reference Standards	Method performance verification	Ensure method modifications maintain analytical validity while reducing energy consumption
Solvent Collection Vessels	Flow rate verification	Pre-weighed, chemically resistant containers for accurate flow measurement
Data Logging Software	Records time-stamped power measurements	Enables correlation of power spikes with specific method events
Thermal Monitoring Equipment	Tracks instrument heat generation	Heat dissipation represents significant energy loss in chromatographic systems
Valproic acid-d15	Valproic acid-d15, CAS:362049-65-8, MF:C8H16O2, MW:159.30 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Ketopioglitazone-d4	Ketopioglitazone-d4, CAS:1215370-26-5, MF:C19H18N2O4S, MW:374.4 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Case Study: Energy Reduction in HPLC Method Translation

Background: A pharmaceutical development laboratory sought to improve the greenness profile of a stability-indicating HPLC method for a new drug substance during technology transfer from HPLC to UPLC.

Initial Conditions:

• HPLC method: 1.0 mL/min flow rate, 25-minute run time
• Original AMGS Instrument Energy Score: 38% (contribution to total AMGS)

Optimization Approach:

• Flow Rate Adjustment: Utilized the scaling equations to reduce UPLC flow rate to 0.45 mL/min while maintaining linear velocity.
• Run Time Optimization: Leveraged improved UPLC efficiency to reduce run time to 12 minutes without compromising resolution.
• Instrument Selection: Compared energy profiles of available UPLC systems using Protocol 2.

Results:

• 62% reduction in Instrument Energy Score contribution (from 38% to 14%)
• 73% reduction in solvent consumption
• Maintained all critical method performance parameters
• Overall AMGS improvement from "Yellow" to "Green" designation

This case demonstrates how systematic attention to flow rate, run time, and instrument selection can dramatically improve method greenness while maintaining analytical integrity [5].

Calculating the Instrument Energy Score component of AMGS requires careful consideration of the interrelationship between flow rate, run time, and instrument-specific characteristics. The experimental protocols provided in this application note enable scientists to quantify these parameters accurately and make informed decisions during method development and optimization. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to prioritize sustainability, understanding and applying these principles will be essential for developing greener analytical methods that reduce environmental impact while maintaining scientific rigor. Future developments in the AMGS calculator, including expansion to GC methods in 2026, will further enhance these capabilities across the analytical laboratory [5].

Within pharmaceutical development, the selection of solvents for analytical methods carries significant environmental, health, and safety (EHS) implications. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) provides a standardized metric to quantify this impact, enabling a more sustainable approach to analytical chemistry [13] [17]. This protocol details the practical application of the AMGS to assess solvents, focusing on the critical parameters of EHS profiles and Cumulative Energy Demand (CED).

The CED represents the total primary energy consumed throughout a product's life cycle, from resource extraction to end-of-life disposal [27] [28]. Its system boundaries are similar to those of a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), making it a valuable energy-focused screening indicator [28]. When integrated with EHS hazard assessments, CED provides a holistic view of a solvent's environmental footprint [5].

This document provides researchers with a clear, actionable framework to integrate these assessments into analytical method development, aligning with broader sustainability goals in the pharmaceutical industry [17].

Background and Principles

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS)

The AMGS is a comprehensive metric developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute (ACS GCI) Pharmaceutical Roundtable [5] [29]. It is designed specifically to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of chromatographic methods by evaluating several dimensions [17]:

• Solvent health, safety, and environmental impact.
• Cumulative energy demand of solvent production and disposal.
• Instrumental energy consumption during method execution.
• Total solvent waste generated [5].

A key principle of the AMGS is that a lower score indicates a greener method [5]. The metric is intended to raise environmental awareness and guide analysts toward more sustainable choices during method development, not to serve as an absolute pass/fail criterion [5].

Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) in Context

The CED is a well-established concept in life cycle methodologies. It quantifies the total amount of primary energy required directly and indirectly to provide a product or service [27] [30]. Calculations follow standardized guidelines (e.g., VDI 4600) and consider all life cycle stages, making it a powerful tool for identifying energy-intensive processes and comparing the energy efficiency of alternatives [30].

The Role of EHS Profiles

EHS profiles evaluate the hazards associated with solvents, covering aspects such as toxicity (both human and ecological), flammability, reactivity, and other safety parameters. Within the AMGS framework, solvent EHS data is combined with energy metrics to provide a multi-faceted assessment of a method's environmental impact [5].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Calculating the AMGS for a Chromatographic Method

This protocol outlines the steps to calculate the AMGS for a liquid chromatography method using the official ACS GCI calculator.

I. Materials and Data Requirements

• ACS GCI AMGS Calculator: Available for download from the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable website [5].
• Chromatographic Method Parameters:
  • Mobile phase composition (solvents and proportions).
  • Flow rate (mL/min).
  • Method runtime (minutes).
  • Injection volume (µL).
  • Column dimensions (length, internal diameter).
  • System suitability test (SST) preparation details, including total dilution volume [5].

II. Step-by-Step Procedure

• Gather Method Data: Compile all chromatographic method parameters from the method standard operating procedure (SOP) or instrument data file.
• Input Solvent Volumes: Enter the type and volume of each solvent used in the mobile phase and sample preparation. For the SST solution, include the total volume of all dilutions if prepared via serial dilution [5].
• Input Instrument Parameters: Enter the method runtime, flow rate, and instrument type (e.g., HPLC, UHPLC). The calculator uses this to estimate instrumental energy consumption.
• Generate AMGS Report: The calculator will compute a total score and break down the contributions from three key areas:
  • Solvent EHS impact.
  • Solvent CED impact.
  • Instrumental energy consumption.
• Interpret Results: The tool color-codes the results. Yellow and red highlights indicate areas with the highest contribution to the total score, pinpointing opportunities for improvement (e.g., reducing runtime to lower instrument energy) [5].

Protocol 2: Solvent Screening for Greenness Using EHS and CED

This protocol describes a pre-emptive screening approach to select greener solvents during the method development phase.

I. Materials

• Solvent Selection Guide: The ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable Solvent Selection Guide or equivalent database [29].
• CED Data Sources: Life cycle inventory databases (e.g., ecoinvent) which are often integrated into LCA software [27].
• Prediction Models: Computational models, such as the PC-SAFT or Jouyban-Acree model, can help predict solvent performance and reduce experimental effort [31].

II. Step-by-Step Procedure

• Define Analytical Requirements: Identify the solvent's required technical function (e.g., elution strength, solubility) and key physical properties.
• Identify Candidate Solvents: Compile a list of solvents that meet the technical requirements from Step 1.
• Evaluate EHS and CED Profiles: For each candidate solvent, retrieve its EHS score from the Solvent Selection Guide and its CED value from LCA databases. The CED is typically expressed in MJ per kg of solvent.
• Compare and Rank Solvents: Rank the solvents based on a combined assessment of their EHS and CED scores. Prioritize solvents with lower hazard and lower energy demand.
• Experimental Validation: Test the top-ranked solvents experimentally to confirm analytical performance. Use predictive models to minimize the number of experiments needed [31] [32].

Table 1: Key Metrics for Solvent Greenness Assessment

Metric	Description	Data Sources	Unit of Measure
EHS Score	Evaluates environmental, health, and safety hazards	ACS GCI Solvent Selection Guide	Dimensionless score (lower is better)
CED	Total primary energy from cradle-to-grave	LCA databases (e.g., ecoinvent)	MJ per kg of solvent
AMGS	Holistic score for analytical methods	ACS GCI AMGS Calculator	Dimensionless score (lower is greener)

Data Presentation and Analysis

Quantitative Data on Solvent Impact

Understanding the relative energy intensity of common solvents is crucial for making informed choices. The following table provides a comparative overview based on CED data.

Table 2: Illustrative Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) of Common Laboratory Solvents

Solvent	Typical CED Range (MJ/kg)	Primary Energy Drivers in Production
Acetonitrile	90 - 120	High-energy synthesis from fossil feedstocks
Methanol	30 - 45	Production from natural gas or biomass
Ethanol	50 - 80	Fermentation process (biobased) vs. synthetic
n-Hexane	70 - 90	Refining and distillation of petroleum
Water	0.001 - 0.1	Purification (reverse osmosis, distillation)
Ethyl Acetate	60 - 85	Esterification process and feedstock energy

Case Study: Application of AMGS

A recent study highlights the utility of the AMGS in practice. When applied to HPLC methods for analyzing anti-hypertensive drugs, the AMGS successfully differentiated the environmental performance of various methods. Methods with lower scores were characterized by shorter runtimes, reduced flow rates, and the use of solvents with more favorable EHS and CED profiles, confirming the metric's value in identifying sustainable and ecologically beneficial options [33].

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Tool/Resource	Function in Assessment	Source/Access
AMGS Calculator	Calculates the comprehensive greenness score for chromatographic methods.	ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable [5]
Solvent Selection Guide	Provides EHS and hazard ratings for a wide range of classical and bio-derived solvents.	ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable [29]
LCA Software (e.g., SimaPro)	Models life cycle impacts, including CED, for solvents and materials.	Commercial software with integrated databases [27]
PC-SAFT / Jouyban-Acree Models	Predicts solute solubility in solvent mixtures, reducing experimental screening effort.	Scientific literature and custom code [31]
Leriglitazone-d4	Leriglitazone-d4, CAS:1188263-49-1, MF:C19H20N2O4S, MW:376.5 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
(R)-Propranolol-d7	(R)-Propranolol-d7, CAS:98897-23-5, MF:C16H21NO2, MW:266.39 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the integrated workflow for assessing solvent impact and developing greener analytical methods, as described in the protocols.

Green Solvent Assessment Workflow

The systematic assessment of solvent EHS profiles and Cumulative Energy Demand is a cornerstone of sustainable analytical chemistry. By integrating these evaluations through the AMGS framework, researchers and drug development professionals can make data-driven decisions that significantly reduce the environmental footprint of analytical methods. The protocols and tools provided here offer a practical pathway to advance the implementation of green chemistry principles in the pharmaceutical industry and beyond.

Within pharmaceutical drug development, the environmental impact of analytical methods is increasingly scrutinized. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) provides a standardized metric to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of separation methods, encouraging the development of more sustainable practices [14] [5]. A critical component of this assessment is the comprehensive accounting of method waste, which includes solvents and reagents from sample preparation and mobile phase consumption [14].

This application note details practical protocols for quantifying and reducing waste in these two key areas. By integrating these procedures, researchers and scientists can directly influence the solvent health, safety, environmental impact, and cumulative energy demand factors within the AMGS framework, thereby lowering their overall score and advancing the goals of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) [34].

Sample Preparation: Minimization and Automation

Sample preparation is often a resource-intensive initial step. Focusing on waste reduction here directly contributes to a greener AMGS profile by minimizing hazardous solvent use and the energy required for waste disposal [34].

Protocol for High-Throughput Robotic Sample Preparation

The following protocol, adapted from high-throughput biomonitoring studies, demonstrates how automation drastically reduces solvent consumption and waste generation while maintaining high analytical precision [35].

• Objective: To automate the sample preparation of biological fluids (e.g., urine) for the analysis of pharmaceutical compounds, minimizing manual labor, solvent use, and hazardous waste.
• Principle: A robotic system performs parallel liquid handling in a 96-well plate format, using optimized volumes for protein precipitation and subsequent analysis [35].

Materials and Reagents:

• Internal Standard Spiking Solution: Isotopically labeled analogs of target analytes in acidified HPLC water (0.1% hydrochloric acid) [35].
• Precipitation Solvent: Acetone, certified for HPLC [35].
• Hydrolysis Reagent: ß-glucuronidase (from Helix pomatia or E. coli) for deconjugation [35].
• Mobile Phase Components: Ammonium acetate buffer and organic solvents (acetonitrile, methanol) [35].
• Equipment: Robotic liquid handling system, microbalance, HPLC system coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, 96-well plates [35].

Experimental Procedure:

• Sample Hydrolysis (If required for conjugated metabolites):

  • Pipette 500 µL of urine sample into a well of a 96-well plate.
  • Add 100 µL of ammonium acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.5) and 10 µL of ß-glucuronidase.
  • Seal the plate and incubate at 37°C for 90 minutes [35].

• Robotic Protein Precipitation and Extraction:

  • Transfer a 100 µL aliquot of the hydrolyzed sample (or neat urine) to a new 96-well plate.
  • Add 50 µL of the internal standard spiking solution.
  • Add 500 µL of ice-cold acetone to precipitate proteins and salts.
  • Seal the plate, vortex mix for 5 minutes, and then centrifuge at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes [35].

• Analysis:

  • The robotic system transfers a clarified supernatant aliquot directly to an HPLC vial for analysis via HPLC-MS/MS with an 8.5-minute runtime [35].

Data and Impact: This automated method prepares 384 samples (four 96-well plates) per day. Recovery rates for target analytes generally exceed 80%, with accuracy ranging from 92–115% and imprecision under 15.0% on average [35]. Compared to manual methods, this protocol reduces solvent consumption per sample by over 50% and eliminates repetitive pipetting labor.

Principles of Green Sample Preparation (GSP)

For methods where full automation is not feasible, several GSP principles can be applied to reduce waste [2]:

• Acceleration: Use vortex mixing or assisted fields (ultrasound, microwaves) to enhance extraction efficiency and speed.
• Parallel Processing: Use miniaturized systems to handle multiple samples simultaneously.
• Integration: Streamline multi-step preparations into a single, continuous workflow to cut down on resource use and waste.

Mobile Phase Consumption: Reduction and Recycling Strategies

Mobile phase consumption is a major contributor to the solvent waste component of the AMGS [14] [36]. The following strategies and protocols offer direct paths to significant reduction.

Quantitative Comparison of Solvent Reduction Strategies

The table below summarizes the impact of different approaches to reducing mobile phase consumption, based on established practices [36].

Table 1: Strategies for Reducing Mobile Phase Consumption and Waste

Strategy	Implementation	Impact on Solvent Use & Waste	Key Considerations
Column Dimension Reduction	Switch from 4.6 mm i.d. to 3.0 mm or 2.1 mm i.d. columns with proportional flow rate reduction.	~60% reduction (4.6 mm to 2.1 mm i.d.) [36]	Requires instrument compatibility to minimize extra-column volume effects.
Mobile Phase Recycling (Isocratic)	Direct detector waste stream back to the mobile phase reservoir.	Near-total elimination of waste for the duration of use [36]	Only for isocratic methods. Requires a stir plate for homogeneity; use time limited to 1-2 weeks [36].
Fractional Recycling	Use an automated valve to divert peak elution periods to waste, returning pure mobile phase to the reservoir.	High recovery of pure mobile phase [36]	Works for isocratic methods; requires a dedicated solvent recycler or timed valve control [36].
Solvent Recovery via Distillation	Distill waste mobile phase to recover organic solvent.	Recovery of organic solvent from aqueous-organic waste streams [36]	Applicable to both isocratic and gradient waste; requires dedicated distillation equipment [36].

Protocol for Method Transfer to Smaller Diameter Columns

Reducing column internal diameter (i.d.) is one of the most effective ways to cut solvent consumption without altering the chemistry of the separation [36].

• Objective: To transfer an existing HPLC/UHPLC method to a column with a smaller internal diameter, thereby reducing mobile phase consumption and waste.
• Principle: Maintaining the same linear velocity of the mobile phase through the column by scaling down the flow rate proportionally to the reduction in column cross-sectional area [36].

Experimental Procedure:

• Calculate New Flow Rate:

  • The new flow rate (Fâ‚‚) is calculated based on the original flow rate (F₁) and the original and new column internal diameters (d₁ and dâ‚‚).
  • Formula: Fâ‚‚ = F₁ × (d₂² / d₁²) [36].
  • Example: Transferring a 2.0 mL/min method from a 4.6 mm i.d. column to a 2.1 mm i.d. column:
    • Fâ‚‚ = 2.0 mL/min × ( (2.1 mm)² / (4.6 mm)² )
    • Fâ‚‚ = 2.0 × (4.41 / 21.16) ≈ 0.42 mL/min [36].

• Adjust Injection Volume (Optional but Recommended):

  • To maintain similar mass load and detection sensitivity, the injection volume should be scaled by the same factor (d₂² / d₁²) or by the ratio of column volumes [36].

• Method Validation:

  • After implementing the new flow rate and injection volume, perform a system suitability test to ensure the method maintains critical parameters such as resolution, plate number, and peak asymmetry [36].

Data and Impact: As shown in the calculation above, transferring a method from a 4.6 mm i.d. column to a 2.1 mm i.d. column reduces solvent use and waste generation by approximately 80%. This strategy is widely applicable and is recognized by pharmacopoeias, requiring only documentation that the new conditions yield equivalent results [36].

Workflow for Mobile Phase Management

The diagram below outlines a decision-making workflow for selecting the optimal mobile phase waste reduction strategy based on your method parameters.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The following table lists key materials and tools essential for implementing the waste-reduction protocols described in this note.

Table 2: Essential Reagents and Tools for Waste-Reduced Analytical Methods

Item	Function & Application	Green Benefit
Robotic Liquid Handler	Automates pipetting, dilution, and extraction in 96- or 384-well plates [35].	Reduces solvent consumption and human error; enables high-throughput with minimal reagent volumes [2] [35].
UHPLC Columns (≤ 2.1 mm i.d.)	Stationary phase for chromatographic separations at reduced flow rates [36].	Directly reduces mobile phase consumption and waste generation by up to 80% compared to 4.6 mm columns [36].
Ionic Liquids / Bio-based Solvents	Alternative solvents for extraction and chromatography [34] [37].	Replaces hazardous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with safer, less toxic, and renewable alternatives [34].
Solvent Recycler / Switching Valve	Automatically diverts waste stream during non-peak elution for mobile phase recycling [36].	Dramatically reduces the volume of fresh mobile phase required for isocratic methods [36].
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	Solventless extraction and concentration of analytes from sample headspace or liquid [37].	Eliminates the need for large volumes of organic solvents in sample preparation [37].
AMGS Calculator	Software tool to quantitatively assess and compare the greenness of analytical methods [14] [5].	Provides a metric to benchmark environmental impact and guides sustainable method development [14].
Desvenlafaxine-d6	Desvenlafaxine-d6, CAS:1062605-69-9, MF:C16H25NO2, MW:269.41 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Desvenlafaxine-d10	Desvenlafaxine-d10, CAS:1062607-49-1, MF:C16H15D10NO2, MW:273.44	Chemical Reagent

In the modern pharmaceutical industry, the environmental impact of drug development and manufacturing has become a critical concern. A compelling case study from AstraZeneca illustrates that the cumulative effect of analytical methods is substantial. A single, widely-used drug required approximately 25 liquid chromatography (LC) analyses per batch, consuming about 18 liters of mobile phase per batch. Scaled to an estimated 1,000 batches annually, this resulted in 18,000 liters of mobile phase consumed and disposed of for just one active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) [17]. This revelation challenged the pervasive perception that analytical methods have an insignificant environmental impact and catalyzed a strategic initiative within AstraZeneca to minimize its analytical footprint.

Driving this initiative is AstraZeneca's ambitious corporate goal to achieve carbon zero status for its analytical laboratories by 2030 [17]. To translate this ambition into measurable action, AstraZeneca has enterprise-wide adopted the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS), a comprehensive metric developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute (ACS GCI) in collaboration with industry partners [13] [5] [17]. The AMGS provides a multi-dimensional evaluation of an analytical method's environmental impact, incorporating factors such as the energy consumed in solvent production and disposal, solvent safety/toxicity (EHS score), and instrument energy consumption [13] [17]. A lower AMGS indicates a greener method, providing a clear, quantitative target for analysts [5]. This case study details AstraZeneca's protocol for the enterprise-wide implementation of AMGS, serving as a model for the pharmaceutical industry.

AMGS Fundamentals and AstraZeneca's Implementation Framework

Understanding the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS)

The AMGS is a holistic metric designed to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of chromatographic analytical methods. It enables scientists to move beyond a binary assessment to a nuanced understanding of a method's sustainability profile. The score aggregates impacts across several key domains, providing both an overall score and insights into specific areas for improvement [5].

The AMGS calculation formula is based on a multi-factor model that evaluates the following core components:

• Solvent EHS Score: Evaluates the environmental, health, and safety impact of the solvents used.
• Solvent Energy Score: Accounts for the cumulative energy demand for solvent production and disposal.
• Instrument Energy Score: Calculates energy consumption based on instrument type and method runtime.
• Solvent Waste Score: Quantifies the volume and impact of waste generated [5] [17].

Color-coding within the AMGS output (yellow and red) highlights areas contributing most significantly to the total score, guiding analysts toward the most impactful optimizations—for instance, shortening method runtime to reduce instrument energy consumption [5].

Successful AMGS implementation requires a suite of tools and resources. The table below details the key components of AstraZeneca's AMGS toolkit.

Table 1: Key Research Reagent Solutions and Essential Materials for AMGS Implementation

Item/Resource	Function in AMGS Implementation
ACS GCI AMGS Calculator	Primary tool for calculating the greenness score; evaluates solvent EHS, solvent energy, instrument energy, and waste [5].
Chromatography Data Systems (CDS)	Provides precise data on solvent consumption, flow rates, and method runtimes essential for accurate AMGS input.
Alternative Solvent Databases	Guides the selection of greener solvent replacements to improve the solvent EHS and energy scores.
Internal Data Trending Tools	AstraZeneca-developed software for tracking AMGS data over time and across the portfolio as a mode of continuous process verification [17].
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Databases	Provides background data on the cumulative energy demand for solvent production, informing the solvent energy score [17].

Enterprise-Wide Implementation Strategy: A Four-Phase Protocol

AstraZeneca's rollout of AMGS across its organization was systematic and strategic, ensuring both comprehensive assessment and sustained improvement.

Strategic Workflow for AMGS Integration

The following diagram visualizes the core, iterative workflow of AstraZeneca's AMGS implementation strategy, from initial assessment to continuous verification.

Diagram 1: Strategic workflow for enterprise-wide AMGS integration, illustrating the continuous improvement cycle.

Phase 1: Baseline Assessment and Portfolio Prioritization

Objective: Establish a quantitative baseline of the current environmental impact of the analytical portfolio.

Protocol:

• Inventory Compilation: Catalog all chromatographic methods used across the drug development portfolio, from early-phase to commercial control methods [17].
• Data Collection: For each method, gather precise data on:
  • Solvent types and volumes per analysis (including mobile phase and sample preparation).
  • Method runtime and instrument type (HPLC vs. UPLC).
  • Waste volume generated per run [17].
• AMGS Calculation: Input the collected data into the ACS GCI AMGS calculator to generate a score for each method.
• Portfolio Categorization: Triage methods into categories based on their AMGS and other factors:
  • High-Priority for Redevelopment: Methods with a high AMGS (poor greenness) that are also stable, well-understood, and run at high frequency.
  • Suitable for Optimization: Methods with moderate AMGS that can be improved with minor modifications.
  • Maintain: Methods that are already green (low AMGS) or are too unstable for modification [17].

Phase 2: Method Optimization and Redevelopment Strategies

Objective: Systematically improve the AMGS of targeted methods without compromising analytical quality.

Protocol: The optimization pathway is a decision-making process for improving method greenness, focused on the most significant contributors to the AMGS.

Diagram 2: Method optimization and redevelopment decision-making pathway.

• Solvent Strategy (Addressing High Solvent EHS/Energy Score):

  • Substitution: Replace toxic or hazardous solvents (e.g., acetonitrile) with safer alternatives (e.g., ethanol or methanol) where chromatographic performance permits [17].
  • Reduction: Implement strategies to minimize solvent volume. This can be achieved by reducing flow rates, exploring narrower diameter columns, or optimizing gradient profiles to shorten run times [17].

• Instrument Strategy (Addressing High Instrument Energy Score):

  • Method Transfer: Transition methods from traditional High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) to Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) or Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC). UPLC operates at higher pressures, allowing for shorter run times and lower solvent consumption, directly reducing both instrument energy and solvent waste scores [17].
  • Runtime Optimization: Critically review and shorten method runtimes, including equilibration times, without compromising system suitability or data quality [5].

Phase 3: Embedding AMGS into Standard Practices and Continuous Verification

Objective: Ensure the sustainability becomes a routine consideration in analytical development and that improvements are sustained.

Protocol:

• Update Governance: Integrate AMGS assessment as a mandatory step in the method development and validation lifecycle. Require that all new methods achieve an AMGS below a predefined threshold [17].
• Create Internal Tools: Develop and deploy customized software tools that automate the collection and trending of AMGS data across the project portfolio. This enables "continuous process verification," allowing the organization to track its progress toward sustainability goals at an aggregate level [17].
• Training and Culture: Conduct training sessions to raise awareness of GAC principles and the business case for AMGS. Empower individual analysts with the knowledge and tools to make greener choices during method development [17].

Results and Strategic Impact

AstraZeneca's implementation of AMGS has transformed its approach to analytical sustainability. The key outcomes are summarized in the table below.

Table 2: Quantitative and Strategic Outcomes of AMGS Implementation at AstraZeneca

Outcome Category	Specific Achievement
Portfolio Insight	Gained holistic, strategic insight into the sustainability profile of the entire chromatographic method portfolio, enabling data-driven decision-making [17].
Standard Practice	Successfully influenced standard practices, making AMGS evaluation a routine part of analytical method development and lifecycle management [17].
Tool Development	Created and deployed internal software tools to trend AMGS data, facilitating continuous verification and long-term monitoring of sustainability goals [17].
Guidance Creation	Developed general guidance for analysts on how to systematically reduce AMGS, focusing on solvent selection, method transfer, and runtime optimization [17].

AstraZeneca's enterprise-wide implementation of the Analytical Method Greenness Score demonstrates a proven, practical model for embedding sustainability into the core of pharmaceutical analytical operations. By moving from perception to quantitative assessment, the company has established a rigorous framework for reducing the environmental footprint of its drug development and manufacturing processes. The strategy—combining baseline assessment, targeted optimization, and integration into standard practices—has yielded significant ecological and operational benefits.

Looking forward, the evolution of green chemistry metrics promises further refinement. The recent proposal of a new metric called GEMAM (Greenness Evaluation Metric for Analytical Methods) aims to be more simple, flexible, and comprehensive, providing a pictogram output for easier interpretation [12]. Furthermore, the ACS GCI is actively working on expanding the AMGS calculator to include Gas Chromatography (GC) by early 2026, broadening its applicability [5]. For the global pharmaceutical industry, AstraZeneca's case study provides a replicable blueprint for leveraging the AMGS to advance sustainability goals, proving that rigorous quality control and environmental stewardship are not mutually exclusive, but are instead complementary pillars of modern, responsible drug development.

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) calculator is a metric tool designed to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of analytical methods, particularly in liquid chromatography and SFC [5]. Its primary purpose is to provide researchers and drug development professionals with an environmental impact awareness, encouraging the development of greener analytical methods. A core feature of the AMGS is its color-coded output, which immediately directs the user's attention to areas with the highest potential for improvement. The fundamental rule for interpretation is: the lower the AMGS, the greener the method [5].

The color coding—specifically yellow and red—functions as a diagnostic guide. It indicates which specific energy score category (e.g., solvent health, instrument energy) contributes a disproportionate amount (beyond approximately one-third) to the total AMGS percentage. These colors are not a rejection of the method but are intended to highlight the highest contribution to the AMGS value, thereby showing scientists where to focus their optimization efforts [5]. For instance, a red code in "instrument energy" strongly suggests that shortening the method run time could significantly reduce the overall score.

Quantitative Data and Scoring Tables

AMGS Color Code Interpretation

Table 1: Interpretation of AMGS color codes and corresponding actions.

Color Code	Semantic Meaning	Contribution to Total AMGS	Recommended Action
Red	High-Priority Area	Tips balance beyond ~1/3 contribution	Primary focus for method improvement; investigate and modify this specific parameter.
Yellow	Medium-Priority Area	Tips balance beyond ~1/3 contribution	Secondary focus; consider optimization after addressing red categories.
(Assumed Green)	Satisfactory Area	Contributes within a balanced proportion	Maintain current performance; no immediate action required.

Fundamentals of Green Chemistry Principles

The evaluation of method greenness is underpinned by core principles. While the AMGS is a specific implementation, other metrics like the AGREE (Analytical GREEnness) score provide a comprehensive view based on the 12 principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) [38]. The following table summarizes the principles of the AGREE metric, which shares a common philosophical ground with the AMGS and aids in a broader understanding of greenness assessment.

Table 2: The 12 Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (SIGNIFICANCE) and their greenness considerations. Adapted from [38].

Principle Number	GAC Principle	Key Greenness Consideration
1	Direct Analytical Techniques	Prefer direct analysis to avoid sample treatment [38].
2	Minimal Sample Size & Number	Reduce sample volume and number of samples collected [38].
3	In-situ Measurements	Perform measurements in the sample's original location [38].
4	Integration of Processes	Combine analytical steps for efficiency [38].
5	Automation & Miniaturization	Automate methods and use miniaturized equipment [38].
6	Derivatization Avoidance	Avoid using additional reagents for derivatization [38].
7	Energy Reduction	Minimize total energy consumption of the analytical method [38].
8	Reagent Reduction	Use fewer, and smaller quantities of, reagents [38].
9	Safety Enhancement	Prefer safer, less toxic reagents [38].
10	Waste Minimization & Recycling	Reduce waste generation and implement recycling [38].
11	Throughput Increase	Improve analysis speed and number of samples per unit time [38].
12	Obtaining Safer Products	Choose reagents that degrade into benign substances [38].

Experimental Protocol for AMGS Assessment and Improvement

Workflow for Method Assessment and Iterative Improvement

The following diagram outlines the core protocol for using the AMGS calculator to evaluate a method and prioritize improvements based on the color-coded results.

Step-by-Step Improvement Protocol

• Input Method Parameters.

  • Action: Gather all relevant data for the analytical method. This includes the type and volumes of solvents used, instrument energy consumption profiles, and method run time.
  • Data Source: Laboratory method documents, instrument specifications, and chemical inventory databases.

• Calculate AMGS.

  • Action: Input the gathered parameters into the AMGS calculator. The tool will compute a total score and assign color codes to specific categories (e.g., solvent health, safety, environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy, method solvent waste) [5].

• Interpret Color-Coded Results & Prioritize.

  • Action: Analyze the output. Identify all categories marked with red and yellow codes. These are your priority areas. A red-coded "instrument energy" score, for example, is a high-priority indicator that the method run time should be shortened [5].

• Implement Method Modifications.

  • Action: Based on the prioritization, experiment with specific changes to the method. Key strategies include:
    • For High Solvent Waste/Impact: Substitute hazardous solvents with safer alternatives (e.g., ethanol instead of methanol), reduce overall solvent volume, or investigate solvent recycling protocols.
    • For High Instrument Energy: Shorten the method run time, reduce the flow rate where possible, or utilize more energy-efficient instrumentation (e.g., UPLC instead of HPLC).

• Re-calculate and Iterate.

  • Action: Re-run the AMGS calculation with the modified parameters.
  • Decision Point: If the score is acceptable and color codes are improved (e.g., red becomes yellow or green), the process is complete. If not, return to Step 3 to identify the next highest priority for improvement.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential materials and strategies for developing greener analytical methods.

Item or Strategy	Function/Application in Green Method Development
Solvent Selection Guide	A reference for replacing hazardous solvents (e.g., acetonitrile, methanol) with safer, more sustainable alternatives (e.g., ethanol, water) to improve solvent health and safety scores.
Method Miniaturization	Utilizing columns with smaller internal diameters and particle sizes to drastically reduce solvent consumption and waste generation, directly addressing Principles 2, 5, 8, and 10 [38].
Solvent Recycling System	Equipment or protocols for collecting and purifying used mobile phase solvents for reuse, minimizing waste and raw material consumption.
UPLC/HPLC System	Modern Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography systems typically offer lower solvent consumption and faster run times compared to conventional HPLC, reducing both solvent and energy impacts.
Energy Monitoring Device	A tool to measure the actual energy consumption of analytical instruments, providing precise data for the "instrument energy" component of the AMGS.
A 1070722	A 1070722, CAS:1384424-80-9, MF:C17H13F3N4O2, MW:362.31 g/mol
Abeprazan	Abeprazan, CAS:1902954-60-2, MF:C19H17F3N2O3S, MW:410.4 g/mol

Integrating AMGS into Existing Analytical Method Development Workflows

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) is a comprehensive metric designed to quantify the environmental impact of analytical methods, particularly in pharmaceutical development. Developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute (ACS GCI) in collaboration with industry partners, this tool provides a standardized approach to evaluate and benchmark the greenness of chromatographic methods [13] [5]. The AMGS algorithm calculates impacts across multiple dimensions: solvent health, safety, and environmental impact; cumulative energy demand for solvent production and disposal; instrument energy consumption; and method solvent waste [5]. A lower AMGS value indicates a greener method, enabling direct comparison between different analytical procedures and guiding scientists toward more sustainable choices during method development [5].

The implementation of AMGS addresses growing sustainability imperatives within the pharmaceutical industry, where analytical chemistry plays a crucial role in drug development and quality control. By integrating this metric into existing workflows, organizations can systematically reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining analytical integrity [13]. This application note provides detailed protocols for incorporating AMGS assessments into routine method development, framed within broader research on green chemistry implementation.

AMGS Calculation and Metric Components

Core Calculation Methodology

The AMGS calculator is publicly available through the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable website and functions as a comparative tool for method benchmarking rather than an absolute measure of greenness [5]. The metric synthesizes data across four primary impact categories:

• Solvent Impact (Health, Safety, Environment): Evaluates solvent toxicity, flammability, environmental persistence, and other hazard factors
• Cumulative Energy Demand (CED): Accounts for energy consumed during solvent production and disposal
• Instrument Energy Usage: Measures chromatography system power consumption during method execution
• Method Solvent Waste: Quantifies total solvent volume used per analysis [5]

The current version (2025) supports liquid chromatography (HPLC, UPLC) and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) methods, with gas chromatography (GC) support planned for 2026 [5]. The tool employs color-coded scoring (green, yellow, red) to highlight areas contributing most significantly to the overall AMGS, guiding developers toward targeted improvements [5].

Quantitative Assessment Parameters

Table 1: Key Input Parameters for AMGS Calculation

Parameter Category	Specific Inputs Required	Data Sources
Solvent Consumption	Mobile phase composition & volume, sample preparation solvents, system wash volumes	Method documentation, solvent databases
Energy Consumption	Instrument type (HPLC, UPLC, SFC), run time, standby energy, detection systems	Instrument specifications, method parameters
Waste Generation	Total waste volume per analysis, waste stream composition	Method calculations, waste tracking systems
Hazard Profiles	Solvent safety data, environmental impact ratings	Safety Data Sheets, GHS classifications, solvent selection guides

Protocol for Integrating AMGS into Method Development Workflows

Initial Method Assessment and Scoping

Purpose: Establish baseline greenness metrics for existing or proposed analytical methods Materials: Method details (mobile phase, run time, flow rate, column dimensions, sample preparation), AMGS calculator, solvent safety data sheets

Procedure:

• Compile Method Parameters: Document complete method details including:
  • Mobile phase composition (exact percentages of all components)
  • Flow rate (mL/min) and run time (minutes)
  • Column dimensions (length, internal diameter, particle size)
  • Injection volume (µL)
  • Sample preparation details (solvents, volumes, number of steps)
  • System suitability test (SST) parameters including serial dilution volumes [5]

• Input Data into AMGS Calculator: Enter all parameters into the web-based AMGS calculator, ensuring accurate representation of solvent volumes and run times.

• Establish Baseline Score: Generate initial AMGS assessment with color-coded component breakdown.

• Identify Improvement Opportunities: Review calculator outputs to pinpoint areas contributing most significantly to environmental impact (marked yellow or red) [5].

Greenness-Driven Method Optimization

Purpose: Systematically reduce environmental impact while maintaining analytical performance Materials: AMGS calculator, alternative solvent options, method robustness data, quality-by-design (QbD) principles

Procedure:

• Solvent Substitution Assessment:
  • Evaluate alternative solvents using the Green Solvents Selecting Tool (GSST) which provides composite sustainability scores (G-value) on a 1-10 scale [39].
  • Replace class 2 and 3 solvents with greener alternatives (e.g., ethanol, water, acetone) where chromatographically feasible [39].

• Method Miniaturization and Efficiency Improvements:

  • Transition to smaller column formats (reduced length and internal diameter)
  • Optimize gradient profiles to reduce run times while maintaining resolution
  • Implement post-run column washing and equilibration only when necessary

• Iterative AMGS Assessment: Recalculate AMGS after each modification to quantify improvement magnitude.

• Design of Experiments (DoE) Integration: Apply QbD principles using statistical experimental design to identify optimal conditions that balance greenness with analytical performance [39]. A documented case study achieved successful separation of four cardiovascular drugs using a mobile phase of 0.1% formic acid in water (pH: 2.5) and ethanol, demonstrating replacement of traditional acetonitrile with a greener alternative [39].

• Validation of Optimized Method: Confirm that the greener method meets all validation parameters (specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness) per ICH guidelines.

Implementation and Monitoring Framework

Purpose: Establish organizational processes for continuous green chemistry improvement Materials: Standard operating procedures, electronic laboratory notebooks, data management systems

Procedure:

• Documentation Standards: Incorporate AMGS calculations into method development reports and certification documents.

• Threshold Establishment: Set internal AMGS targets based on method type and organizational sustainability goals.

• Trend Monitoring: Implement systems to track AMGS data over time, enabling measurement of progress toward sustainability objectives [13].

• Knowledge Management: Share successful green method transformations across development teams to accelerate organizational learning.

Experimental Protocol: AMGS Assessment for HPLC Method

Case Study: Antihypertensive Drug Combination Analysis

This protocol details the experimental methodology referenced in search results [39], which successfully developed a green HPLC method for simultaneous determination of Nebivolol hydrochloride, Telmisartan, Valsartan, and Amlodipine besylate.

Research Reagent Solutions:

Table 2: Essential Materials for Green HPLC Method Development

Reagent/Material	Specifications	Function in Method
Ethanol (absolute)	99.8% purity, analytical grade	Green solvent for mobile phase and sample preparation [39]
Formic Acid	Analytical reagent grade	Mobile phase modifier (0.1% in water) for pH control [39]
Octadecyl Silica (ODS) Column	Standard C18 column (e.g., 150 × 4.6 mm, 5μm)	Stationary phase for separation [39]
Analytical Reference Standards	Nebivolol HCl, Telmisartan, Valsartan, Amlodipine besylate	Method development and validation [39]
Water (HPLC grade)	Purified, 18.2 MΩ·cm resistance	Mobile phase component [39]

Instrumentation and Conditions:

• HPLC System: Agilent 1260 Infinity II with DAD detector (or equivalent)
• Detection Wavelength: 220 nm
• Column Temperature: 25°C
• Injection Volume: 10 μL
• Mobile Phase: Ethanol:0.1% formic acid in water (pH adjusted to 2.5) [39]
• Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min
• Gradient Program: Optimized via DoE approach
• Run Time: Minimized while maintaining resolution (>2.0 between all peaks)

AMGS-Specific Assessment Steps:

• Calculate solvent volumes: Account for mobile phase consumption across the entire gradient program, including equilibration.
• Document sample preparation: Include all solvents used in standard and sample preparation.
• Account for system suitability testing: Include solvent volumes from serial dilutions for resolution and sensitivity solutions [5].
• Input instrument energy: HPLC system power consumption × method runtime.
• Generate AMGS report: Use the ACS GCI calculator to obtain final score and component breakdown.

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the systematic integration of AMGS assessment into the analytical method development lifecycle, highlighting decision points and iterative optimization:

Diagram 1: AMGS Integration Workflow. This workflow illustrates the iterative process of incorporating greenness assessment into method development, with feedback loops for continuous optimization.

Complementary Green Assessment Tools

While AMGS provides a valuable quantitative metric, comprehensive greenness evaluation benefits from complementary assessment frameworks:

• Analytical Greenness Metric (AGREE): Provides a pictogram-based output evaluating 12 principles of green analytical chemistry [18] [39]
• White Analytical Chemistry (WAC): Employs an RGB (Red-Green-Blue) model to balance analytical efficiency (red), ecological impact (green), and practical/economic factors (blue) [18] [39]
• Eco-Scale Assessment (ESA): Assigns penalty points to hazardous practices, with higher scores indicating greener methods [18]

The parallel application of these tools enables multidimensional sustainability assessment, ensuring that environmental improvements do not compromise analytical performance or practical utility [18] [39].

The integration of AMGS into analytical method development represents a practical implementation of green chemistry principles in pharmaceutical research. By following the protocols outlined in this application note, scientists can systematically reduce the environmental impact of chromatographic methods while maintaining regulatory compliance and analytical performance. The case study demonstrates that significant greenness improvements are achievable through solvent substitution, method miniaturization, and runtime optimization. As the AMGS calculator evolves to include additional chromatographic techniques, its utility as a standardized metric for sustainability in analytical chemistry will continue to expand, supporting the pharmaceutical industry's transition toward more environmentally responsible practices.

Optimizing Methods with AMGS: Strategies for Score Improvement

The implementation of sustainability principles in analytical laboratories is increasingly guided by quantitative metrics, with the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) emerging as a key evaluation tool. For researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, understanding which components of this score have the most significant environmental impact is crucial for effective eco-friendly method development and optimization [40]. Unlike purely qualitative assessment tools, AMGS provides a quantitative framework that enables direct comparison between analytical methods, focusing on the reduction of environmental footprint without compromising analytical performance [40]. This application note examines the core components of the AMGS metric, identifies high-impact improvement opportunities, and provides detailed protocols for its practical implementation in pharmaceutical research and development settings.

AMGS Components and Their Relative Impact

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) calculator, available through the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable, evaluates methodologies based on a comprehensive set of environmental parameters [40]. A case study modernizing the USP monograph assay for naproxen sodium tablets demonstrated how AMGS quantifies sustainability improvements, with scores decreasing from 110 (HPLC) to under 30 (UPLC), primarily driven by reductions in instrument energy and solvent consumption [40].

Table 1: Core AMGS Components and Their Environmental Impact

Score Component	Relative Impact	Key Influence Factors	Optimization Strategy
Instrument Energy	High	System type, analytical run time, number of injections [40]	Method transfer to UHPLC/UPLC; reduced run times; batch optimization [40]
Solvent Energy	High	Flow rate, mobile phase composition, run time [40]	Solvent volume reduction; alternative solvent selection; method miniaturization [40]
Solvent EHS (Environment, Health, Safety)	Medium-High	Toxicity, flammability, waste disposal requirements of solvents [40]	Replacement with safer alternatives (e.g., ethanol); waste stream management [41]
Sample Consumption	Medium	Injection volume, number of replicates [40]	Miniaturization of sample preparation; reduced injection volumes [40]

High-Impact Optimization Strategies

Instrumentation and Energy Consumption

The instrument energy score is often the most significant contributor to the overall AMGS value [40]. Modernization from conventional HPLC to UHPLC or UPLC technology represents the most impactful optimization strategy. This transition reduces run times and energy consumption per sample while maintaining analytical performance. In the naproxen case study, this modernization yielded a four-fold reduction in analytical run time and solvent usage when moving to UHPLC, and an eight-fold decrease in run time with a 13-fold decrease in solvent usage when implementing UPLC [40].

Solvent Usage and Selection

Solvent-related parameters (both energy and EHS) collectively constitute a major portion of the AMGS environmental impact. Optimization strategies include:

• Method scaling: Adjusting flow rates and column dimensions to minimize solvent consumption [40]
• Alternative solvents: Replacing hazardous solvents with safer alternatives, though this must be balanced with maintaining chromatographic performance [40]
• Solvent volume tracking: Precisely calculating mobile phase needs for standards and samples to minimize waste [40]

Sample Preparation and Throughput

While sample consumption has a medium impact score, its optimization contributes significantly to overall sustainability:

• Miniaturization strategies: Reduced injection volumes and scaled-down sample preparation methods [40]
• Throughput enhancement: Increasing sample throughput per hour directly improves resource utilization efficiency [40]
• Batch optimization: Strategic planning of sample batches to minimize standard preparations and system equilibration time [40]

Experimental Protocol: AMGS Assessment for Analytical Methods

Protocol for AMGS Calculation and Application

Objective: To quantitatively evaluate and improve the environmental footprint of an analytical method using the AMGS metric. Materials: ACS Green Chemistry Institute AMGS calculator; method parameters; solvent safety data sheets.

AMGS Implementation Workflow

Procedure:

• Method Definition
  • Select the analytical technique in the AMGS calculator [40]
  • Define the number of analytes of interest [40]
  • Input the total number of injections required for a complete analysis (including standards and replicates) [40]

• Instrument Parameters

  • Input flow rate (mL/min) [40]
  • Input analytical run time (minutes) [40]
  • Specify whether gradient or isocratic conditions are used [40]

• Solvent Data Input

  • Input mobile phase composition (percentages of each component) [40]
  • Select specific solvents from the available dropdown options [40]
  • For solvents not listed, select the closest available alternative [40]

• Sample Information

  • Calculate and input volumes of samples and standards based on injection volume and number of replicates [40]
  • While these volumes may not be practical from a laboratory standpoint, they enable the calculator to factor sample consumption into the overall assessment [40]

• Score Calculation and Analysis

  • Generate the AMGS score [40]
  • Analyze individual component scores (instrument energy, solvent energy, solvent EHS) to identify high-impact improvement opportunities [40]
  • Compare against alternative method configurations or technologies [40]

Validation Protocol for Modernized Methods

Objective: To ensure that sustainability improvements do not compromise analytical performance. Materials: UHPLC/UPLC systems; sub-2µm particle columns; reference standards.

Procedure:

• System Suitability Verification
  • Confirm that modernized methods meet all original system suitability requirements [40]
  • Verify reproducibility for standards and calculated concentrations of formulated samples [40]

• Method Equivalency Assessment

  • Demonstrate that the modernized method provides equivalent separation and sensitivity [40]
  • Validate that key performance parameters (resolution, peak symmetry, etc.) meet acceptance criteria [40]

• Sustainability Metric Comparison

  • Calculate AMGS for both original and modernized methods [40]
  • Quantify improvements in solvent consumption, energy usage, and waste generation [40]
  • Document operational benefits including reduced run times and lower solvent costs [40]

The Scientist's Toolkit for Green Method Development

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions and Materials

Tool/Reagent	Function in Green Method Development	Sustainability Benefit
UHPLC/UPLC Systems	High-pressure fluidic systems enabling faster separations with smaller particle columns [40]	Reduced analysis time, lower solvent consumption, decreased energy use per sample [40]
Sub-2µm Particle Columns	Stationary phases for improved separation efficiency [40]	Enables method scaling and reduction of solvent volumes [40]
ACS Green Chemistry Institute AMGS Calculator	Free online tool for quantitative greenness assessment [40]	Enables objective comparison of method environmental footprints [40]
Alternative Solvents (e.g., Ethanol)	Replacement for more hazardous solvents in mobile phases [40]	Improved EHS profile; bio-based sources possible [40]
Method Miniaturization Equipment	Technologies enabling reduced sample and solvent volumes [40]	Direct reduction of resource consumption and waste generation [41]

The Analytical Method Greenness Score provides researchers with a strategic framework for identifying and prioritizing sustainability improvements in analytical methods. The most significant opportunities for environmental impact reduction lie in modernizing instrumentation to reduce energy consumption and optimizing solvent usage through method scaling and alternative selection. For validated methods that cannot be completely redeveloped, technology modernization presents a viable path to substantially improved sustainability without the need for revalidation [40]. By focusing on the high-impact components of the AMGS metric, drug development professionals can effectively balance analytical performance with environmental responsibility, contributing to more sustainable pharmaceutical research practices.

The selection of solvents is a critical consideration in pharmaceutical development and analytical chemistry, with profound implications for environmental impact, operator safety, and process sustainability. Solvents typically constitute the largest volume of chemicals used in pharmaceutical processes, particularly in synthesis, purification, and analytical methodologies such as High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) [42]. The drive toward greener solvent usage is fueled by increasingly stringent global regulations, evolving safety standards, and the pharmaceutical industry's commitment to sustainable practices. This application note establishes strategic frameworks for selecting solvents that minimize Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) impacts and reduce cumulative energy demand (CED), contextualized within the implementation of the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) to benchmark and improve analytical procedures.

The core principle of green solvent selection involves replacing hazardous, petroleum-based solvents with safer, bio-based alternatives while maintaining or enhancing analytical performance. Traditional solvents like acetonitrile, n-hexane, and dichloromethane (DCM) present significant EHS concerns, including toxicity, flammability, and environmental persistence [43] [42]. The transition to green solvents aligns with the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC), aiming to minimize the environmental footprint of analytical methods throughout their lifecycle, from sample preparation to waste disposal [43].

Quantitative Assessment Frameworks

Solvent Selection Guides and Scoring Systems

Several structured frameworks enable quantitative comparison of solvent greenness. These guides evaluate solvents based on EHS profiles and CED, providing composite scores to guide decision-making. Two prominent systems are the ETH Zurich EHS/CED assessment and the Rowan University Environmental Index.

Table 1: Comparison of Solvent Greenness Assessment Tools

Assessment Tool	Key Parameters Evaluated	Scoring System	Key Insights
ETH Zurich EHS/CED [42]	Environmental (air/water/soil impacts), Health (toxicity, exposure limits), Safety (flash point, explosion risk), Cumulative Energy Demand	0 (most green) to 9 (least green) for EHS; MJ/kg for CED	Alcohols and esters (e.g., Ethanol, Methyl acetate) offer optimal balance of low EHS impact and CED.
Rowan University Environmental Index [42]	Acute toxicity, biodegradation, global warming potential, carcinogenicity, etc. (12 parameters total)	0 (most green) to 10 (least green)	Provides finer differentiation between similar solvents (e.g., hydrocarbons) compared to ETH Zurich tool.

These tools reveal that solvents such as ethanol, ethyl acetate, and bio-based alcohols consistently achieve favorable greenness scores due to their lower toxicity, ready biodegradability, and renewable production pathways [42]. In contrast, solvents like 1,4-dioxane, formaldehyde, and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) score poorly due to significant health hazards and higher energy demands for production and disposal [42].

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) Calculator

The AMGS calculator is a specialized metric developed by the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable to evaluate the environmental impact of chromatographic methods [14] [5] [44]. It provides a unified, straightforward score to compare methods and guide analysts toward greener choices without compromising separation performance.

The AMGS algorithm integrates three critical components:

• Solvent Impact: Assesses the health, safety, and environmental impact of the solvents used, along with the total volume of waste generated [5] [44].
• Cumulative Energy Demand (CED): Accounts for the energy required to produce the solvents used in the method [5].
• Instrument Energy Usage: Calculates the energy consumption of the chromatographic instrument during method execution, which is influenced by run time, flow rate, and instrumental demands [5].

A lower AMGS value indicates a greener method. The calculator employs color-coding (green, yellow, red) to highlight which component contributes most significantly to the score, thus pinpointing areas for potential improvement, such as reducing run time to lower instrument energy [5].

Diagram 1: The AMGS Calculation and Optimization Workflow. This iterative process assesses a method's environmental impact across three key areas to generate a final score and guide improvements.

Experimental Protocols for Green Solvent Implementation

Protocol 1: Green Solvent Substitution in Reversed-Phase HPLC

Principle: Replaced-phase HPLC is the most common chromatographic mode but traditionally relies on environmentally problematic solvents like acetonitrile [43]. This protocol outlines a systematic approach for substituting acetonitrile with greener alternatives, primarily ethanol.

Materials:

• HPLC system compatible with ethanol-based mobile phases
• Analytical column (e.g., C18, 100 x 2.1 mm, sub-2 µm particles)
• HPLC-grade ethanol, acetonitrile, and water
• Standard and sample solutions

Procedure:

• Initial Method Assessment: Begin with the existing acetonitrile-water method. Note the retention factor (k) and selectivity (α) of critical peak pairs.
• System Compatibility Check: Ensure the HPLC system components (pumps, seals, tubing) are compatible with higher viscosity solvents like ethanol. If needed, adjust the system pressure limit.
• Direct Ethanol Substitution: Replace acetonitrile with ethanol isocratically at the same percentage (v/v). Be aware that ethanol is more elutropic than acetonitrile; a slightly lower percentage may be required to achieve similar retention [43].
• Method Optimization: Fine-tune the ethanol-to-water ratio to achieve the desired retention and resolution. If using UV detection, note that ethanol has a higher UV cut-off (~210 nm) which may affect baseline noise at low wavelengths [45].
• Gradient Conversion: If the original method uses a gradient, re-develop the gradient profile for ethanol-water. The different elution strength will necessitate adjustments to the gradient slope and time [43].
• Performance Verification: Confirm that the new method meets all system suitability criteria (resolution, tailing factor, plate count) and provides equivalent or better quantitative performance compared to the original method.
• AMGS Calculation: Input the parameters of the new method (solvent types, volumes, run time) into the AMGS calculator and compare the score to the original method to quantify the greenness improvement [14].

Notes: Ethanol is biodegradable, less toxic, and can be produced from renewable biomass, making it a superior green alternative [43] [42]. If ethanol does not provide the necessary selectivity, other bio-based solvents like 2-methyltetrahydrofuran or ethyl acetate can be investigated in ternary mixtures with water [43] [46].

Protocol 2: Method Miniaturization and Efficiency Enhancement

Principle: Reducing column dimensions and particle size significantly decreases solvent consumption and waste generation while maintaining or improving chromatographic efficiency [45] [43].

Materials:

• UHPLC system capable of high pressures
• Miniaturized column (e.g., 50-100 mm length, 2.1 mm internal diameter, packed with 1.7-1.8 µm particles)
• Appropriate solvent filtra tion apparatus

Procedure:

• Column Selection: Choose a column with a stationary phase chemistry similar to the original (e.g., 4.6 mm ID) method but with smaller dimensions and particles.
• Flow Rate Calculation: Scale down the flow rate proportionally to the square of the column radius ratio. For example, when moving from a 4.6 mm ID column to a 2.1 mm ID column, the new flow rate (Fâ‚‚) is calculated as: Fâ‚‚ = F₁ × (r₂² / r₁²) = F₁ × (1.05² / 2.3²) ≈ F₁ × 0.21 This reduces the flow rate to about one-fifth of the original [43].
• Gradient Scaling: Scale the gradient time (t₉) by the same factor as the change in column void volume (tâ‚€), which is proportional to the change in (column length × radius²). For a change in column length and diameter, the new gradient time is: t₉₂ = t₉₁ × (Lâ‚‚ / L₁) × (r₂² / r₁²)
• Injection Volume Scaling: Reduce the injection volume proportionally to the change in column volume to avoid overloading.
• System Re-optimization: The faster analysis and different kinetics may require minor adjustments to the gradient or temperature to fine-tune separation.
• Waste Volume and AMGS Assessment: Measure the total solvent waste generated per analysis. Input the new parameters (greatly reduced solvent volumes and shorter run time) into the AMGS calculator. The score should show a marked improvement due to lower solvent impact and instrument energy [5].

Notes: This approach can reduce solvent consumption and waste generation by over 75% compared to standard HPLC methods [43]. The combination of method miniaturization and green solvent substitution (Protocol 1) delivers the most significant environmental benefits.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Solutions

Successful implementation of green solvent strategies requires specific reagents, tools, and materials. The following table details key solutions for developing sustainable chromatographic methods.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Chromatography

Reagent / Material	Function & Green Characteristics	Application Notes & Considerations
Bio-based Ethanol [45] [46]	Green Mobile Phase Modifier: Less toxic and biodegradable versus acetonitrile. Derived from renewable biomass (e.g., sugarcane).	Higher viscosity increases backpressure. Higher UV cut-off may limit low-wavelength detection [45].
Supercritical COâ‚‚ [45] [43]	Mobile Phase for SFC: Non-flammable, non-toxic, and easily recycled. Offers low viscosity for fast separations.	Requires specialized SFC instrumentation. Polarity often requires co-solvents (modifiers) [43].
Ethyl Lactate [47] [48]	Bio-based Solvent: Derived from fermentation of sugars. Low toxicity, readily biodegradable, and safe handling profile.	Used in various applications including extraction and as a mobile phase component.
2-Methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF) [46]	Bio-based Solvent: Produced from biomass (e.g., corn cobs, sugarcane). Low miscibility with water useful for extraction.	Preferred over traditional THF, which has high cumulative energy demand [42] [46].
Lactate Esters & D-Limonene [47] [48]	Bio-based Solvents: Derived from citrus and agricultural products. Favorable EHS profiles and renewable feedstocks.	Gaining traction in coatings, adhesives, and cleaning products as green substitutes [48].
AMGS Calculator [14] [5]	Greenness Metric Tool: Free online tool to quantify and compare the environmental impact of chromatographic methods.	Critical for validating the greenness of new methods and guiding iterative improvements.

The strategic selection of solvents based on EHS impact and cumulative energy demand is no longer an optional practice but a fundamental component of sustainable pharmaceutical development and analysis. Frameworks like the AMGS calculator provide a critical, quantitative foundation for this transition, enabling scientists to make informed decisions that significantly reduce the environmental footprint of analytical methods.

The future of green solvent technology is promising, driven by innovation in bio-based solvents, advanced analytical techniques, and increasingly sophisticated assessment tools. The ongoing development of the AMGS calculator to include Gas Chromatography (GC) methods by early 2026 exemplifies the dynamic nature of this field [5]. By adopting the protocols and strategies outlined in this application note—green solvent substitution, method miniaturization, and continuous evaluation using the AMGS—researchers and drug development professionals can play a pivotal role in advancing greener chemistry practices, ensuring that both product quality and planetary health are optimized.

Within pharmaceutical drug development, enhancing the environmental profile of analytical methods is increasingly critical. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) calculator, developed by the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable, provides a standardized metric to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of separation methods [14] [5]. A lower AMGS signifies a greener method.

This guide details practical, experimental protocols for improving method efficiency—specifically through shortening chromatographic run times and optimizing flow rates—to directly reduce the AMGS. These strategies lower cumulative energy demand and solvent consumption, which are key factors in the AMGS calculation [14] [5]. By implementing these protocols, researchers and scientists can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of their analytical workflows while maintaining data quality.

Core Principles and Impact on AMGS

The AMGS metric quantitatively assesses a method's environmental impact by integrating three core components: the health, safety, and environmental impact of solvents used, the cumulative energy demand of the system, and the total solvent waste generated [14] [5]. Instrument energy usage, which is directly proportional to method run time, and solvent consumption, which is directly related to flow rate and run time, are therefore primary levers for improving the greenness score.

Shortening run times reduces the instrument energy usage component of the AMGS. Modern high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) systems enable faster and more efficient separations, yet these capabilities are often underutilized [14]. Optimizing flow rates minimizes the volume of solvent used per analysis, thereby reducing both the solvent impact score and the waste component of the AMGS [5]. The color-coding in the AMGS calculator (yellow and red) highlights areas where energy or waste contributions are disproportionately high, guiding analysts to where these optimizations will be most effective [5].

Experimental Protocols for Efficiency Optimization

Protocol 1: Systematic Method Scoping for Run Time Reduction

Objective: To establish the shortest viable isocratic or gradient run time that maintains baseline resolution for all critical peak pairs.

Materials:

• HPLC/UHPLC System: Capable of operating at high pressures (e.g., >600 bar for UHPLC).
• Chromatography Data System (CDS) for data acquisition and processing.
• Test Sample: Containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and all known relevant impurities/degradants.
• Mobile Phase Components: As specified in the original method.
• Recommended Column: A modern, high-efficiency column (e.g., sub-2µm particles for UHPLC, or core-shell technology for HPLC).

Procedure:

• Initial Method Translation: If starting from an HPLC method, translate it to a UHPLC-compatible platform using column calculator software. If no prior method exists, start with a generic fast gradient (e.g., 5-95% organic modifier over 5 minutes).
• Scouting Gradient: Perform an initial scouting run with a wide gradient range (e.g., 5-95% organic modifier) and a flow rate scaled for the column diameter. Observe the elution window of the peaks of interest.
• Gradient Compression: Adjust the gradient time (t_G) to focus the run. Set the gradient start percentage just below the elution of the first peak and the gradient end percentage just above the elution of the last peak. Systematically reduce the gradient time in 30-second increments.
• Resolution Assessment: After each reduction, calculate the resolution (R_s) between the most critical peak pair. Continue shortening the run time until the resolution of this critical pair falls below the system suitability requirement (typically R_s > 2.0).
• Flow Rate Fine-Tuning: Once the minimal gradient time is found, adjust the flow rate in 0.1 mL/min increments (for a 2.1mm column) to see if a further reduction in total cycle time (run time + re-equilibration) is possible without compromising resolution or exceeding pressure limits.

Data Analysis: Record the resolution, peak capacity, and tailing factor for each experimental condition. The optimal condition is the one with the shortest total cycle time that meets all system suitability criteria.

Protocol 2: Flow Rate Optimization with Kinetic Plot Analysis

Objective: To empirically determine the flow rate that delivers the required separation efficiency in the shortest analysis time.

Materials:

• As listed in Protocol 1.

Procedure:

• Baseline Establishment: Execute the method (isocratic or a shortened gradient from Protocol 1) at a standard, low flow rate (e.g., 0.2 mL/min for a 2.1mm column) to establish a baseline for plate count (N) and resolution.
• Flow Rate Ramp: Perform the same method at incrementally higher flow rates (e.g., 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 mL/min). Ensure the system pressure remains within the instrument's safe operating limit.
• Data Recording: For each flow rate (F), record the retention time (t_R) of the last eluting peak, the backpressure, and the plate count for a well-retained peak.
• Construct Kinetic Plot: Calculate the required column length (L_req) to achieve the same plate count (N_target) at each flow rate using the relationship L_req = N_target / H (where H is the height equivalent to a theoretical plate). Then, calculate the corresponding analysis time (t_0,req) using the dead time (t_0) and the required column length.

Data Analysis: Plot the analysis time (t_0,req) against the flow rate or the required column length. The optimal flow rate is typically found at the "elbow" of this curve, representing the best compromise between speed and efficiency. This directly minimizes solvent consumption and waste.

Quantitative Data from Optimization Studies

Table 1: Exemplar Data from Run Time Shortening Protocol (Gradient Method)

Gradient Time (min)	Total Cycle Time (min)	Critical Pair Resolution (R_s)	Theoretical Plates (N)	Estimated Solvent Saved per Run	AMGS Contribution (Energy/Waste)
15.0 (Original)	20.0	4.5	15,000	Baseline	High (Red)
10.0	14.0	3.8	14,200	30%	Medium (Yellow)
7.5	11.0	2.8	13,500	45%	Low (Green)
5.0 (Optimized)	8.5	2.1	12,800	57.5%	Low (Green)

Table 2: Exemplar Data from Flow Rate Optimization Protocol (Isocratic Method)

Flow Rate (mL/min)	Backpressure (bar)	Analysis Time (min)	Theoretical Plates (N)	Solvent Waste per Run (mL)	AMGS Contribution (Waste)
0.3 (Original)	280	12.0	16,000	3.6	Medium (Yellow)
0.5	450	7.2	15,200	3.6	Low (Green)
0.7 (Optimized)	610	5.1	14,000	3.6	Low (Green)
0.9	780	4.0	12,100	3.6	Low (Green)

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for Method Efficiency Optimization

Item / Reagent	Function & Rationale
Modern UHPLC System	Instrument capable of operating at pressures >600 bar to leverage sub-2µm particle columns, enabling faster flow rates and reduced diffusion, which directly shortens run times [14].
High-Efficiency Column	Columns packed with sub-2µm fully porous or sub-3µm core-shell particles. They provide higher efficiency per unit time and length, which is the foundation for method acceleration [14].
LC Column Calculator Software	Software tools that facilitate the translation of methods from traditional HPLC to UHPLC conditions by calculating scaled parameters (flow rate, gradient time, injection volume) to maintain equivalent separation performance [14].
System Suitability Test (SST) Mixture	A reference standard containing the API and key impurities. It is critical for verifying that resolution, efficiency, and peak shape are maintained after any optimization, ensuring method robustness [5].
Greenness Assessment Tool (AMGS Calculator)	The web-based tool from the ACS GCI PR that calculates the Analytical Method Greenness Score. It is used to quantitatively benchmark the environmental impact of the original method against optimized versions [14] [5].

Workflow and Strategic Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for implementing the efficiency improvements described in this document, framed within the overarching goal of improving the Analytical Method Greenness Score.

Diagram 1: Method efficiency optimization workflow for AMGS improvement.

The systematic application of run time reduction and flow rate optimization protocols provides a direct and measurable pathway to greener analytical practices in pharmaceutical development. By focusing on these key efficiency parameters, researchers can significantly reduce the cumulative energy demand and solvent waste of their methods, leading to a lower Analytical Method Greenness Score. The experimental protocols and data presented herein offer a practical framework for scientists to enhance method sustainability without compromising chromatographic performance, thereby supporting the broader adoption of green chemistry principles in the analytical laboratory.

This application note provides a structured comparison of the environmental sustainability profiles of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC), and Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC). Framed within the context of Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) research, this document delivers detailed protocols and quantitative assessments to guide researchers and drug development professionals in selecting chromatographic techniques that align with Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles. The data presented demonstrate that SFC and UHPLC generally offer superior greenness profiles compared to conventional HPLC, primarily through significant reductions in organic solvent consumption and waste generation.

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) has emerged as a critical discipline focused on minimizing the environmental impact of analytical methods [41]. In pharmaceutical analysis, this translates to reducing hazardous solvent use, minimizing waste generation, and improving energy efficiency without compromising analytical performance. The principles of GAC provide a structured approach to developing and assessing analytical methods with sustainability as a key consideration [49]. Several metrics have been developed to quantify the environmental footprint of analytical procedures, including the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS), which offers a single numerical measure to evaluate solvent choice, energy demands, and waste production [50]. These assessment tools are essential for objectively comparing the greenness profiles of different chromatographic techniques and guiding the selection of environmentally sustainable methods in pharmaceutical analysis and drug development.

Greenness Profile Comparison of HPLC, UHPLC, and SFC

Quantitative Greenness Assessment

Table 1: Comparative Greenness Profiles of HPLC, UHPLC, and SFC

Parameter	HPLC	UHPLC	SFC
Typical Solvent Consumption per Analysis	10-20 mL	2-5 mL	1-3 mL (primarily COâ‚‚)
Primary Solvent Type	Acetonitrile, Methanol (hazardous)	Acetonitrile, Methanol (hazardous)	Supercritical COâ‚‚ (green) with organic modifiers
Organic Modifier Volume	High	Moderate	Low (0.5-5%)
Waste Generation per Analysis	High (10-20 mL)	Low (2-5 mL)	Very Low (1-3 mL)
Energy Consumption	Moderate	Moderate-High (due to high pressure)	Moderate (compression energy)
Solvent Disposal Cost	High	Moderate	Low
Sample Throughput	Low-Moderate	High	Very High
Toxicity Profile	High (hazardous solvents)	High (hazardous solvents)	Low (primarily COâ‚‚)
Estimated AMGS	Moderate (50-70)	Good (70-85)	Excellent (85-95)

Technique-Specific Green Characteristics

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Traditional HPLC represents the least green option among the three techniques, typically consuming 10-20 mL of organic solvents per analysis and generating corresponding waste volumes [49]. Conventional methods often employ hazardous solvents like acetonitrile and methanol, which pose environmental and occupational health risks [49]. The primary greenness improvements for HPLC involve solvent substitution strategies, such as replacing acetonitrile with ethanol or methanol in mobile phases, using aqueous mobile phases where possible, and employing ionic liquids as green solvent additives [51]. These approaches can moderately improve the greenness profile but cannot overcome the fundamental limitations of the technique regarding solvent consumption and waste generation.

Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC)

UHPLC offers significant environmental advantages over conventional HPLC through reduced solvent consumption and waste generation [51] [50]. By utilizing smaller particle sizes (sub-2µm) and shorter columns, UHPLC can achieve reductions in solvent usage of up to 80-90% compared to conventional HPLC while maintaining or improving chromatographic performance [51]. The technology leverages improved van Deemter kinetics, with superficially porous particles (SPPs) further enhancing efficiency by lowering eddy diffusion and mass transfer terms [50]. This enables high-efficiency separations with shorter columns and run times, significantly reducing solvent waste and energy consumption per analysis [50]. The main environmental trade-offs include higher instrument costs, more stringent maintenance requirements, and potentially higher energy consumption due to ultra-high pressure operation.

Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC)

SFC represents the greenest chromatographic technology among the three, primarily utilizing supercritical COâ‚‚ as the mobile phase, which is non-toxic, non-flammable, and readily available [51]. The technique significantly reduces organic solvent consumption, typically employing only 0.5-5% organic modifiers compared to 60-90% in reversed-phase HPLC [51]. Supercritical COâ‚‚ has low viscosity and high diffusivity, enabling faster separations and higher throughput with minimal waste generation [51]. The primary environmental consideration for SFC is the energy required for COâ‚‚ compression and temperature control. When applied to pharmaceutical impurity profiling, SFC has demonstrated excellent greenness metrics while maintaining robust analytical performance [51].

Experimental Protocols for Greenness Assessment

Protocol 1: Solvent Consumption and Waste Assessment

Objective: Quantify and compare solvent consumption and waste generation across HPLC, UHPLC, and SFC methods.

Materials:

• Chromatographic systems (HPLC, UHPLC, SFC)
• Graduated solvent reservoirs
• Waste collection containers
• Analytical balance (±0.1 mg precision)
• Method parameters for each technique

Procedure:

• Method Standardization: Develop separation methods for the same analyte mixture on each platform with equivalent resolution (Rs > 2.0).
• Solvent Measurement: Pre-measure mobile phase volumes in graduated containers before analysis.
• System Equilibration: Equilibrate each system until stable baselines are achieved, recording the volume used.
• Sample Analysis: Perform six replicate injections of the standard mixture, collecting all waste separately.
• Waste Quantification: Weigh waste containers after analysis and calculate waste volume using solvent density.
• Data Normalization: Express solvent consumption and waste generation per sample, accounting for equilibration volumes.

Calculations:

• Total solvent consumption = (Initial solvent volume - Final solvent volume)
• Waste generation per sample = Total waste volume / Number of samples
• Solvent efficiency = (Analytical run time × Flow rate) / Theoretical maximum consumption

Protocol 2: Comprehensive Greenness Metric Application

Objective: Apply multiple greenness assessment tools (AMGS, AGREE, GAPI) to each chromatographic technique for holistic evaluation.

Materials:

• Validated analytical methods for HPLC, UHPLC, and SFC
• Greenness assessment software/tools (AGREE, GAPI, MoGAPI)
• Data on solvent toxicity, energy consumption, waste generation

Procedure:

• Data Collection: Compile complete method parameters including:
  • Solvent types and volumes
  • Energy consumption (instrument power ratings × run time)
  • Sample preparation requirements
  • Waste treatment procedures
  • Throughput (samples per hour)

• AMGS Calculation:

  • Input solvent toxicity scores (Globally Harmonized System classifications)
  • Measure actual solvent volumes consumed
  • Calculate energy usage (kWh per sample)
  • Apply AMGS algorithm to generate numerical score [50]

• AGREE Assessment:

  • Use AGREE software with input parameters based on all 12 GAC principles
  • Evaluate each principle on a scale of 0-1
  • Generate radial diagram and overall score [41] [49]

• GAPI/MoGAPI Evaluation:

  • Apply GAPI pictogram for each technique stage (sample prep, separation, detection)
  • Use color-coded assessment (green to red) for each parameter
  • Apply MoGAPI for modified scoring system if required [41] [52]

• Comparative Analysis: Synthesize results from all metrics to generate comprehensive greenness profiles.

Visual Guide to Greenness Assessment

Greenness Evaluation Workflow

Greenness Evaluation Workflow: This diagram illustrates the systematic approach for assessing and improving the environmental profile of chromatographic methods using multiple metrics.

Technique Selection Decision Pathway

Technique Selection Pathway: This decision tree guides the selection of chromatographic techniques based on greenness priorities, throughput requirements, and existing method constraints.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Key Reagents and Materials for Green Chromatographic Analysis

Item	Function	Green Alternatives
Acetonitrile	Common HPLC mobile phase component	Ethanol, methanol, or carbonate esters (dimethyl carbonate, propylene carbonate) [51] [50]
Methanol	HPLC mobile phase component	Ethanol (preferred due to lower toxicity) [51]
Supercritical COâ‚‚	Primary mobile phase for SFC	Recycled or by-product COâ‚‚ sources [51]
Ethanol-Water Mixtures	Green mobile phases for reversed-phase chromatography	Bio-derived ethanol [51]
Carbonate Esters	Green solvent alternatives for LC	Dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, propylene carbonate [50]
Ionic Liquids	Mobile phase additives for improved separation	Biodegradable ionic liquids [51]
Narrow-Bore Columns (≤2.1 mm ID)	Reduced solvent consumption in LC	Columns with reduced internal diameter [51]
Superficially Porous Particle (SPP) Columns	Improved efficiency with lower backpressure	Core-shell technology columns [50]
Tetrabutylammonium Perchlorate	Additive for selectivity control in HILIC	Alternative salts with lower environmental impact [50]

This comprehensive comparison demonstrates that SFC provides the most environmentally sustainable chromatographic platform, particularly for high-throughput pharmaceutical applications where solvent consumption and waste generation are primary concerns. UHPLC offers a balanced approach, delivering significant greenness improvements over conventional HPLC while maintaining compatibility with existing HPLC methodologies and infrastructure. For laboratories constrained to traditional HPLC systems, substantial greenness improvements can be achieved through solvent substitution (replacing acetonitrile with ethanol), method miniaturization, and waste reduction strategies.

Implementation of green chromatographic practices should be guided by multi-metric assessment using established tools including AMGS, AGREE, and GAPI to ensure holistic evaluation of environmental impact. Future directions in green chromatography should focus on the development of increasingly sustainable solvent systems, further miniaturization of separation platforms, and integration of green principles throughout the analytical method lifecycle.

In the context of drug development, sample and standard preparation are critical stages where significant waste generation can occur. Adopting waste reduction techniques is essential for aligning analytical methods with the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and for improving a method's Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) [14]. The AMGS calculator provides a straightforward metric to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of analytical methods, incorporating the health, safety, and environmental impact of solvents, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste [14]. This document outlines practical strategies and detailed protocols for minimizing waste volumes in sample preparation, thereby supporting the pharmaceutical industry's move toward more sustainable laboratory practices.

Micro-Scale Extraction Techniques

Traditional sample preparation techniques, such as standard Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) and Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE), are increasingly being replaced by miniaturized alternatives that substantially reduce solvent consumption and waste generation [53]. These microextraction techniques have evolved to incorporate greener materials and solvents while maintaining, or even enhancing, analytical performance [53].

Sorbent-Based Microextraction Approaches

Sorbent-based techniques utilize a solid phase to isolate and pre-concentrate analytes from a sample matrix.

• Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME): This technique uses a fused silica fiber coated with a thin layer of a stationary phase. The fiber is exposed to the sample for a predetermined time, allowing analytes to partition into the coating. After extraction, the fiber is transferred to the injection port of a chromatographic system for thermal desorption and analysis [53].
• Advanced Sorbent Materials: The field is moving towards the use of sustainable sorbents with high extraction efficiency. Key materials include:
  • Magnetic Nanoparticles: These allow for easy retrieval after extraction using an external magnet, simplifying the procedure and reducing preparation time [53].
  • Biosorbents: Materials derived from natural sources, such as chitosan, cellulose, cork, and pollen, are biodegradable, sustainable, and offer excellent extraction capacity [53].

Solvent-Based Microextraction Approaches

These techniques use minimal volumes of liquid for extraction, representing a major downscaling of traditional LLE.

• Single-Drop Microextraction (SDME): A micro-liter volume droplet of a water-immiscible solvent is suspended in an aqueous sample. Analytes are extracted into the droplet, which is then retracted and transferred for analysis.
• Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (DLLME): A few tens of micro-liters of extraction solvent are dispersed in an aqueous sample with the aid of a disperser solvent. After centrifugation, the sedimented phase is collected for analysis.
• Green Solvents: There is a strong focus on replacing traditional toxic organic solvents with safer, biodegradable alternatives [53].
  • Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs): These are formed by mixing a hydrogen bond donor and a hydrogen bond acceptor. They are characterized by low toxicity, biodegradability, and are often prepared from natural precursors [53].
  • Supramolecular Solvents (SUPRAs): These are water-immiscible liquids generated from the self-assembly of amphiphilic molecules. They can be synthesized in situ and have a strong capability to extract diverse analytes [53].

Table 1: Comparison of Traditional vs. Micro-Scale Extraction Techniques

Feature	Traditional SPE/LLE	Microextraction Techniques
Typical Solvent Volume	50 - 500 mL	1 µL - 1 mL
Sample Volume	10 - 1000 mL	1 - 10 mL
Extraction Time	30 - 60 minutes	5 - 30 minutes
Automation Potential	Moderate	High
Primary Waste Source	Solvent disposal	Minimal solvent waste

Experimental Protocols for Waste Reduction

Protocol 1: Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction (MSPE) for Aqueous Samples

This protocol uses magnetic nanoparticles for the rapid extraction of organic compounds from water, eliminating the need for large-volume cartridge-based SPE and centrifugation steps [53].

1. Reagents and Materials:

• Magnetic Sorbent: Fe₃Oâ‚„@SiOâ‚‚-C18 nanoparticles.
• Extraction Solvent: 1.5 mL of methanol (for elution).
• Sample: 10 mL of filtered aqueous sample.
• Equipment: pH meter, vortex mixer, magnetic stand, 15 mL conical tube, HPLC vial.

2. Procedure: a. Adjust the pH of the 10 mL sample to 7.0 ± 0.5. b. Add 25 mg of magnetic sorbent to the sample tube. c. Vortex the mixture vigorously for 3 minutes to allow analyte adsorption. d. Place the tube on a magnetic stand for 1 minute to separate the sorbent. e. Carefully decant and discard the supernatant. f. Add 1.5 mL of methanol to the sorbent and vortex for 2 minutes to desorb the analytes. g. Place the tube back on the magnetic stand, then transfer the eluent to an HPLC vial for analysis.

3. Waste and Volume Assessment:

• Total solvent waste: 1.5 mL methanol per sample.
• Sample volume required: 10 mL.
• The sorbent can be regenerated and reused for up to 5 cycles, further reducing material waste [53].

Protocol 2: Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (DLLME) with Deep Eutectic Solvent

This protocol employs a green solvent for the pre-concentration of analytes from a liquid sample, drastically reducing hazardous solvent use [53].

1. Reagents and Materials:

• Extraction Solvent: 100 µL of DES (prepared from choline chloride and phenol in a 1:2 molar ratio).
• Disperser Solvent: 1.0 mL of acetone.
• Sample: 5.0 mL of standard or pre-processed sample solution in a 15 mL conical tube.
• Equipment: Centrifuge, HPLC vial with 300 µL insert.

2. Procedure: a. Inject a mixture of 1.0 mL acetone (disperser) and 100 µL DES (extraction solvent) rapidly into the 5.0 mL sample using a syringe. b. A cloudy solution forms immediately. Vortex for 1 minute. c. Centrifuge at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes to sediment the DES phase. d. Using a micro-syringe, carefully withdraw ~80 µL of the sedimented phase from the bottom of the tube. e. Transfer the extract into a 300 µL HPLC vial insert for analysis.

3. Waste and Volume Assessment:

• Total solvent waste: ~1.1 mL (acetone + DES) per sample.
• Sample volume required: 5 mL.

Quantitative Assessment of Greenness

Evaluating the effectiveness of waste reduction strategies is crucial. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) calculator is a metric developed by the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable that enables the comparison of separation methods based on their environmental impact [14]. It scores methods by considering solvent health, safety, and environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste [14]. Furthermore, other tools like the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) calculator can provide a complementary, comprehensive assessment based on the 12 principles of GAC [4].

Table 2: Quantitative Waste Profile and Greenness Score Comparison

Parameter	Traditional LLE	MSPE Protocol	DLLME-DES Protocol
Solvent Volume (mL)	250	1.5	1.1
Sample Volume (mL)	100	10	5
Energy Demand (kWh)*	1.5	0.8	0.7
Hazardous Waste (mL)	250 (Chloroform)	1.5 (Methanol)	0 (Green DES)
Estimated AMGS	Lower (e.g., 45)	Higher (e.g., 75)	Higher (e.g., 80)

*Estimated energy for solvent production and method execution.

The Scientist's Toolkit

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Green Sample Preparation

Item	Function in Waste Reduction
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers	Eliminates the need for solvent use in extraction for volatile/semi-volatile analytes.
Magnetic Nanoparticles (e.g., Fe₃O₄)	Enable easy sorbent retrieval without centrifugation, simplifying workflow and saving energy [53].
Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs)	Serve as low-toxicity, biodegradable replacements for hazardous organic solvents [53].
Micro-Syringes (10-100 µL)	Allow for precise handling of micro-liter volumes of samples and solvents.
96-Well Plate SPE Modules	Enable high-throughput sample processing with drastically reduced solvent volumes per sample.

Workflow and Decision Pathway

The following diagram illustrates a logical pathway for selecting the appropriate waste reduction technique based on sample properties and analytical goals.

Green Sample Prep Selection Pathway

Implementing the waste reduction techniques detailed in these application notes—specifically through the adoption of microextraction technologies and green solvents—directly contributes to the development of environmentally sustainable analytical methods. By minimizing solvent consumption and sample volumes, these protocols significantly reduce the environmental footprint of sample preparation. When evaluated using metrics like the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS), these green practices demonstrate a clear and quantifiable improvement in method sustainability. For researchers and drug development professionals, adopting these protocols is a critical step toward aligning laboratory workflows with the core principles of Green Analytical Chemistry, ultimately supporting the broader pharmaceutical industry goal of reducing its environmental impact.

Troubleshooting Common Challenges in AMGS Implementation

The implementation of an Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) provides a critical, quantitative assessment of the environmental impact of analytical procedures used in drug development. This framework evaluates methods based on key criteria such as waste production, energy consumption, and the use of hazardous substances, aligning with the broader pharmaceutical industry goals of embracing Green Chemistry principles. This document outlines common challenges encountered during AMGS implementation and provides detailed, actionable protocols for researchers to overcome them, thereby ensuring robust and sustainable analytical practices.

Quantitative Data Presentation in AMGS

Effective AMGS implementation relies on the clear presentation of quantitative data for comparing the greenness of different analytical methods. The data is best summarized in frequency tables and visualized through histograms to reveal distribution patterns, or line diagrams to track performance over time [54] [55].

Table 1: Sample Greenness Score Distribution for 50 HPLC Methods

AMGS Range (Points)	Number of Methods	Percentage of Total
0-20	5	10%
21-40	12	24%
41-60	18	36%
61-80	10	20%
81-100	5	10%

Table 2: Comparative Greenness Assessment of Two Analytical Methods

Evaluation Criterion	Method A (Traditional HPLC)	Method B (Greener UHPLC)
Solvent Consumption (mL/analysis)	10.0	2.5
Energy Use (kWh/analysis)	1.5	0.8
Hazardous Waste Generated (g/analysis)	8.5	1.2
Calculated AMGS	52	85

Common Implementation Challenges and Troubleshooting Protocols

A structured approach to troubleshooting is essential for resolving common obstacles in AMGS application.

Challenge: Data Fragmentation and Inconsistent Scoring

Data fragmentation across multiple platforms and inconsistent application of scoring criteria lead to unreliable AMGS calculations and an inability to establish a single source of truth for method greenness [56].

Experimental Protocol for Data Unification:

• Objective: To create a centralized and standardized system for AMGS data collection and calculation.
• Materials: Solvent consumption logs, energy meters, waste manifests, a centralized database (e.g., SQL), and AMGS calculation software.
• Procedure:
  • Step 1: Identify all data sources for the 12 core AMGS criteria (e.g., HPLC instrument logs, chemical inventory systems, waste disposal records).
  • Step 2: Establish a standardized data template (e.g., a CSV file) with defined units and formats for each criterion.
  • Step 3: Develop or utilize software with application programming interface (API) connectors to automatically ingest data from the identified sources into a central repository [56].
  • Step 4: Implement a calibration protocol where multiple scientists score the same test method. Review discrepancies and refine scoring guidelines until a >95% inter-operator consistency is achieved.
  • Step 5: Generate a unified AMGS report from the centralized system for a pilot method and validate its accuracy against a manually compiled score.
• Validation: The protocol is successful when AMGS scores for the same method, calculated by different users or at different times, show a variance of less than 5%.

Challenge: High Resource Consumption in Method Development

The iterative process of analytical method development can be resource-intensive, conflicting with the core goals of green chemistry.

Experimental Protocol for Resource-Optimized Screening:

• Objective: To reduce solvent and energy waste during the initial screening of analytical conditions for a new method.
• Materials: Liquid chromatography system, autosampler, microtiter plates, solvent selection library, and an automated screening software module.
• Procedure:
  • Step 1: Utilize a statistically-designed experiment (e.g., Design of Experiments, DoE) to identify the critical factors (e.g., pH, solvent strength, gradient time) that influence both separation and greenness.
  • Step 2: Employ a micro-scale screening platform where initial experiments are performed at a fraction of the standard scale (e.g., 1/10th of the column diameter and flow rate).
  • Step 3: Use an InterCriteria Analysis (ICrA) decision-making approach to analyze the correlation between different experimental parameters and the resulting AMGS [57]. This helps identify and eliminate redundant or non-informative experimental conditions from the screening protocol.
  • Step 4: Based on the ICrA results, define an Optimized Experimental Protocol (OEP) that focuses only on the most impactful conditions.
  • Step 5: Validate the OEP by comparing the final method's performance and AMGS with a method developed using the full, non-optimized screening protocol.
• Validation: A successful optimization reduces solvent consumption during the development phase by at least 40% without compromising the final method's chromatographic resolution or robustness [57].

Challenge: Inefficient Lifecycle Management of Green Methods

Manually managed method databases lead to outdated information, where methods with poor greenness scores remain in active use, and newer, greener alternatives are not adopted.

Experimental Protocol for Automated Lifecycle Management:

• Objective: To automate the tracking, review, and retirement of analytical methods based on their AMGS.
• Materials: Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), electronic laboratory notebook (ELN), and automated workflow software.
• Procedure:
  • Step 1: In the LIMS, tag all analytical methods with their current AMGS and date of last review.
  • Step 2: Implement policy-based workflows that automatically trigger a review when a method's AMGS falls below a predefined threshold (e.g., 50) or after a set period (e.g., 24 months) [56].
  • Step 3: The workflow should automatically notify the method owner and relevant stakeholders, and assign tasks for review.
  • Step 4: Upon review, the system should present comparators with higher AMGS for potential replacement.
  • Step 5: Automate the deprovisioning of outdated methods from the "approved methods" list in the LIMS once a greener replacement is validated and approved, eliminating residual use [56].
• Validation: The protocol is deemed effective when the average AMGS of all actively used methods in the laboratory increases by 10 points within 18 months of implementation, and no methods with an AMGS below a set threshold remain in active status.

Workflow Visualization

AMGS Implementation Logic

Centralized Data Management

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Selecting the right materials is fundamental to developing greener analytical methods. The following table details key solutions.

Table 3: Essential Reagents for Green Analytical Method Development

Reagent / Solution	Function in Green Chemistry	Example & Rationale
Alternative Solvents	Replaces hazardous organic solvents (e.g., acetonitrile, methanol) with safer, bio-based options.	Cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME): A safer alternative to ethers like THF and MTBE due to its high boiling point, low peroxide formation, and poor miscibility with water, simplifying waste separation.
Solid-State Reagents	Minimizes solvent use in sample preparation and derivatization steps.	Potassium carbonate (anhydrous): Used as a solid desiccant instead of water-removing solvents, or as a solid base catalyst, eliminating the need for liquid bases and subsequent neutralization steps.
Catalysts	Reduces reaction time, energy consumption, and required reagent quantities.	Immobilized enzymes: Provide high specificity and operate under aqueous, mild conditions, replacing heavy metal catalysts and high-temperature/pressure processes.
Supercritical Fluids	Serves as a non-toxic replacement for organic solvents in separation techniques.	Supercritical COâ‚‚: Used in Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC) as the primary mobile phase, drastically reducing or eliminating the use of hazardous organic solvents compared to HPLC.

Establishing Internal Benchmarks and Continuous Improvement Processes

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) calculator provides a standardized metric to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of analytical separation methods used in drug development [14]. Establishing internal benchmarks and a continuous improvement process for AMGS enables organizations to systematically reduce the environmental footprint of their analytical activities while maintaining scientific rigor. This framework incorporates solvent health, safety, and environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste into a single composite score, where a lower AMGS value indicates a greener method [5]. This protocol details the implementation of this framework within research and development settings, aligned with broader Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles that focus on mitigating the adverse effects of analytical activities on human health and the environment [4].

AMGS Components and Quantitative Benchmarking

The AMGS metric evaluates method greenness based on multiple quantitative criteria. Understanding and measuring these components is the first step in establishing internal benchmarks.

Table 1: Core Components of the Analytical Method Greenness Score

Component Category	Specific Metrics	Data Source	Impact on Score
Solvent Impact	Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) profile	Solvent safety data sheets	Higher HSE impact increases score
Energy Consumption	Cumulative energy demand; Instrument energy usage during method runtime	Instrument power specifications; Method duration	More energy consumption increases score
Resource & Waste	Total solvent waste generated per analysis	Method flow rate, duration, and solvent composition	More waste increases score

The AMGS calculator uses a color-coding system (e.g., yellow and red) to highlight areas with the highest contribution to the total score, providing immediate visual feedback on where a method could be improved, such as by reducing instrument run time to lower energy consumption [5].

Experimental Protocol for AMGS Assessment

This protocol provides a step-by-step methodology for calculating the AMGS of a liquid chromatography (LC) or supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) method.

Materials and Reagents

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for AMGS Assessment

Item Name	Function/Description	Example
Mobile Phase Solvents	Liquid carriers for chromatographic separation	Acetonitrile, Methanol, Water, COâ‚‚
API Reference Standard	High-purity compound for system suitability testing (SST)	Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
Dilution Solvents	Solvents used for serial dilution in sample/standard prep	Often matches mobile phase

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Method Parameter Collection: For the analytical method under evaluation, record the following:

  • Chromatographic Conditions: Instrument type (HPLC, UHPLC, SFC), flow rate (°C), column temperature (°C), and back-pressure (for SFC).
  • Solvent Composition: Exact proportions and identities of all solvents in the mobile phase and sample preparation.
  • Run Time: Total method duration per injection (minutes).
  • System Suitability Test (SST) Details: Volume and composition of all solvents used in preparing the SST solution, including serial dilutions [5].

• Data Input into AMGS Calculator: Input the collected parameters into the AMGS calculator tool, which is available from the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable [14] [5].

• Score Calculation and Color-Code Interpretation: The calculator will generate an overall AMGS percentage and sub-scores for energy, waste, and solvent. Interpret the results as follows:

  • Lowest AMGS %: The greenest method option.
  • Red/Yellow Coded Categories: Indicate areas contributing most significantly to the score, thus identifying primary targets for improvement [5].

• Internal Benchmarking: Compare the calculated AMGS against internally established benchmark values for similar types of methods (e.g., related compound methods, assay methods). This comparison determines if the method is "Best-in-Class," "Needs Improvement," or "Requires Investigation."

Figure 1: Workflow for assessing and improving a method's AMGS.

Continuous Improvement Process and Target Setting

A continuous improvement cycle is essential for systematically enhancing the greenness of an analytical portfolio.

The Improvement Workflow

The improvement process is a cyclical workflow, as visualized in Figure 1. After comparing a method's AMGS against internal benchmarks, a failure to meet the target triggers an improvement strategy. This strategy is informed by the color-coded breakdown from the AMGS calculator, which pinpoints whether solvent, energy, or waste is the primary contributor. The method is then modified and re-evaluated until it meets the benchmark, at which point it is documented and deployed.

Establishing Improvement Targets

Table 3: Example Internal Benchmark Tiers for HPLC/UHPLC Methods

Method Tier	AMGS Target Range	Typical Characteristics	Improvement Priority
Gold (Best-in-Class)	< 30%	Uses benign solvents (e.g., water, ethanol), low energy (short UHPLC runs), minimal waste	Maintenance
Silver (Good Practice)	30% - 50%	Moderate organic solvent use, standard UHPLC/HPLC run times	Low
Bronze (Needs Improvement)	> 50%	High organic solvent use (e.g., acetonitrile), long HPLC run times, high waste volume	High

Strategy Selection Based on AMGS Output

Figure 2: Logic for selecting an improvement strategy based on the AMGS color code.

Implementation and Reporting

Integrate AMGS assessment as a mandatory checkpoint during analytical method development, validation, and technology transfer phases. Maintain a corporate database of all methods and their AMGS values to track progress over time. Regular reviews (e.g., annually) of the method portfolio against the established benchmarks allow for the identification of methods that have become outliers and are candidates for re-development. Reporting should focus on the reduction in total AMGS score across the portfolio and the migration of methods from lower to higher tiers, demonstrating a tangible commitment to sustainable practices.

Validating AMGS: Comparative Analysis with Other Green Metrics

The adoption of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles represents a paradigm shift in modern analytical science, driven by the need to minimize the environmental impact of chemical analysis while maintaining analytical integrity. Within pharmaceutical research and drug development, where analytical methods are employed extensively from discovery to quality control, implementing robust greenness assessment has become crucial for sustainable laboratory practices. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) has emerged alongside other established metrics including the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI), Analytical Greenness (AGREE), and Analytical Eco-Scale as tools for quantifying and comparing the environmental friendliness of analytical procedures. Each tool offers distinct methodologies, scoring systems, and visual outputs, providing researchers with multiple approaches for evaluating their methods against GAC principles. This application note provides a detailed comparative analysis of these four assessment tools, offering structured protocols for their implementation within pharmaceutical research settings to guide scientists in selecting appropriate metrics for specific applications and fostering the adoption of sustainable analytical practices in drug development workflows.

Comparative Analysis of Greenness Assessment Tools

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of Greenness Assessment Tools

Tool Name	Scoring System	Visual Output	Assessment Basis	Primary Output
AMGS	Numerical score	None described [4] [12]	Specific criteria not detailed in available literature	Quantitative score
NEMI	Binary (Pass/Fail) for 4 criteria	Quadrant pictogram [41]	Persistence, toxicity, waste volume, corrosiveness [41]	Qualitative pictogram
Analytical Eco-Scale	100-point base with penalty deductions	Numerical score only [41]	Hazardous reagent use, energy consumption, waste [41]	Quantitative score
AGREE	0-1 scale	Circular pictogram with sections [41]	All 12 GAC principles [18] [41]	Pictogram + quantitative score

Detailed Tool Comparison and Applications

Table 2: Comprehensive Comparison of Assessment Capabilities

Tool Name	Key Advantages	Key Limitations	Implementation Complexity	Ideal Use Cases
AMGS	Provides quantitative score for comparison [4]	Lacks pictogram for visual communication; specific criteria not detailed [12]	Not specified	Methods requiring simple quantitative comparison
NEMI	Simple interpretation; user-friendly pictogram [41]	Binary system lacks granularity; limited scope (only 4 criteria) [41]	Low	Initial screening; methods with minimal environmental impact
Analytical Eco-Scale	Quantitative score; facilitates direct comparison [41]	Lacks visual component; relies on expert judgment for penalties [41]	Medium	Educational settings; labs prioritizing quantitative metrics
AGREE	Comprehensive (all 12 GAC principles); visual + quantitative output [18] [41]	Subjective weighting; doesn't fully address pre-analytical processes [41]	Medium to High	Regulatory documentation; comprehensive method evaluation

The selection of an appropriate greenness assessment tool depends on the specific requirements of the analytical application. NEMI offers the most straightforward approach with its simple pass/fail pictogram, making it suitable for initial screening purposes where detailed differentiation is not required [41]. In contrast, the Analytical Eco-Scale provides a more nuanced quantitative assessment through its penalty point system, allowing for finer discrimination between methods with similar environmental profiles [41]. AGREE currently represents the most comprehensive approach, incorporating all 12 principles of GAC into an easily interpretable visual output accompanied by a quantitative score, making it particularly valuable for thorough method evaluation and regulatory documentation [18] [41]. While details on AMGS scoring methodology are less documented, it appears to function primarily as a quantitative assessment tool without complementary visual components [4] [12].

Complementary Assessment Frameworks

Beyond these established greenness-specific tools, the analytical chemistry field has developed more comprehensive frameworks that integrate environmental assessment with other methodological considerations. The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) concept employs a red-green-blue (RGB) model where green represents environmental impact, red corresponds to analytical performance, and blue addresses practical/economic factors [58]. This holistic approach ensures that environmental improvements do not compromise analytical validity or practical implementation. Specific tools have been developed to assess the red and blue components, including the Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) for analytical validation criteria and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) for practical considerations [58]. These can be used alongside greenness metrics to provide a complete picture of method suitability.

Implementation Protocols

Protocol for AGREE Assessment

The AGREE assessment protocol provides the most comprehensive evaluation against all 12 GAC principles, offering both visual and quantitative outputs for comparative analysis.

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Data Collection: Compile complete methodological details including all reagents (type, volume, toxicity), energy consumption (instrumentation, duration), waste generation (volume, treatment), and sample throughput [41].
• Tool Access: Download the open-source AGREE software or worksheet from authorized repositories.
• Parameter Input: Enter collected data corresponding to each of the 12 GAC principles. The software typically uses a weighting system for different parameters based on their environmental significance [18].
• Output Generation: The tool generates a circular pictogram divided into 12 sections with colors ranging from red (poor) to green (excellent) for each principle, with an overall score between 0-1 in the center [41].
• Interpretation: Methods scoring above 0.75 are considered excellent, 0.50-0.75 good, and below 0.50 indicate significant need for improvement.

Technical Notes: AGREE is particularly valuable for methods requiring comprehensive environmental profiling and regulatory documentation. The software implementation reduces subjectivity compared to manual assessment tools.

Protocol for Analytical Eco-Scale Assessment

The Analytical Eco-Scale employs a penalty-based system that subtracts points from an ideal baseline of 100 for various non-green method attributes.

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Baseline Establishment: Begin with a perfect score of 100 representing an ideal green method.
• Penalty Assignment: Deduct points for non-green attributes:
  • Reagents: 1-5 points per gram based on hazard classification
  • Waste: 1-5 points per gram based on toxicity and treatment requirements
  • Energy: 1-5 points based on consumption relative to method duration [41]
• Score Calculation: Subtract total penalty points from 100 to obtain final score.
• Interpretation: Scores above 75 represent excellent green methods, 50-75 are acceptable, and below 50 indicate poor environmental performance.

Technical Notes: The main challenge lies in the consistent application of penalty points across different assessors. Establishing internal laboratory standards for penalty assignment improves reproducibility.

Protocol for NEMI Assessment

The NEMI assessment provides a simple binary evaluation against four basic environmental criteria, represented in a straightforward pictogram.

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Criteria Evaluation: Assess method against four criteria:
  • Persistence: Are all reagents not persistent in the environment?
  • Toxicity: Are all reagents not classified as toxic?
  • Corrosiveness: Does method use no reagents with pH ≤2 or ≥12?
  • Waste: Does method generate ≤50g waste per sample? [41]
• Pictogram Generation: For each criterion the method passes, fill in the corresponding quadrant in the NEMI pictogram.
• Interpretation: A fully filled pictogram indicates passing all four basic environmental criteria. A partially filled pictogram shows specific areas of non-compliance.

Technical Notes: While simple to implement, NEMI's binary system and limited scope mean it may not differentiate between methods with moderate versus significant environmental impacts. Best used for preliminary screening rather than detailed comparison.

Research Reagent Solutions for Green Analytical Chemistry

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Green Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function in Green Analysis	Application Examples	Environmental Benefit
Bio-based solvents (ethanol, ethyl acetate, limonene)	Replacement for petrochemical solvents	Extraction, chromatography, cleaning [41]	Renewable sourcing, reduced toxicity, biodegradability
Ionic liquids	Green solvent alternative for extractions	Sample preparation, chromatographic separations	Non-volatile, reusable, low flammability
Supercritical COâ‚‚	Solvent for extraction and chromatography	SFE, SFC	Non-toxic, non-flammable, easily removed
Natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES)	Biocompatible extraction media	Natural product isolation, biomolecule extraction	Biodegradable, low toxicity, from renewable resources
Miniaturized devices (microextraction equipment)	Reduced reagent consumption	SPME, SBSE, microextraction techniques	Dramatically reduced solvent volumes (µL vs mL)
Solid-phase reagents	Reduced solvent use in synthesis	On-column derivatization, reagent immobilization	Minimal solvent needs, often recyclable

Implementation of these green reagents and materials directly impacts assessment scores across all metrics. For example, substituting acetonitrile with ethanol in HPLC methods reduces toxicity penalties in Analytical Eco-Scale, improves reagent scores in AGREE, and may help pass NEMI's toxicity criterion.

Integration in Pharmaceutical Research

The application of greenness assessment tools aligns with broader sustainability initiatives in pharmaceutical research and development. Within drug development workflows, analytical methods are employed across multiple stages including raw material testing, in-process controls, stability testing, and final product quality assessment. Implementing systematic greenness evaluation at method development and validation stages ensures that environmental considerations are embedded throughout the pharmaceutical quality system.

The evolution of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) provides a framework for balancing greenness with analytical performance (red) and practical applicability (blue) [58]. This holistic approach is particularly valuable in regulated pharmaceutical environments where method validity and robustness are non-negotiable. Recent regulatory developments, including the FDA Modernization Act 2.0, signal increasing acceptance of innovative approaches in pharmaceutical development [59], potentially creating opportunities for greater incorporation of green chemistry principles in regulatory submissions.

Greenness assessment tools can be strategically deployed throughout the method lifecycle:

• Method Development: AGREE or Analytical Eco-Scale for comparing alternatives
• Method Validation: NEMI for quick compliance checking
• Method Transfer: AMGS for quantitative comparison between sites
• Continuous Improvement: Periodic reassessment with multiple tools

The comprehensive evaluation of AMGS, NEMI, AGREE, and Analytical Eco-Scale reveals distinct profiles for each assessment tool, with varying strengths appropriate for different applications within pharmaceutical research. AGREE currently offers the most comprehensive evaluation against all 12 GAC principles with complementary visual and quantitative outputs, while Analytical Eco-Scale provides robust quantitative comparison capabilities. NEMI serves well for preliminary screening, though its binary nature limits granular assessment. The specific implementation context, including regulatory requirements, resource constraints, and communication needs, should drive tool selection. For pharmaceutical laboratories committed to sustainability, establishing standardized assessment protocols using these tools represents a significant step toward reducing the environmental footprint of analytical operations while maintaining the scientific rigor essential for drug development.

Strengths and Limitations of AMGS for Chromatographic Method Assessment

The drive towards sustainability in the pharmaceutical industry has intensified the focus on minimizing the environmental footprint of analytical techniques, particularly chromatography [17]. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and related techniques, while fundamental to quality control and regulatory compliance, contribute significantly to solvent consumption, waste generation, and energy use [60]. The cumulative impact of even a single analytical method becomes substantial when scaled across global manufacturing networks; a case study on rosuvastatin calcium revealed that approximately 18,000 liters of mobile phase are consumed annually for the chromatographic analysis of this single active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) [17]. To quantitatively assess and manage this environmental impact, the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) was developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute (ACS-GCI) in collaboration with industry partners [17] [61]. This metric provides a standardized approach for evaluating the environmental sustainability of chromatographic methods, enabling organizations to systematically reduce their ecological footprint while maintaining analytical rigor [17] [13].

AMGS Scoring Methodology

The Analytical Method Greenness Score represents a comprehensive metric that evaluates chromatographic methods across multiple environmental dimensions. Unlike simpler assessment tools, AMGS incorporates several quantitative parameters to generate a holistic sustainability profile, with a lower score indicating a greener method [61].

Core Calculation Components

The AMGS algorithm integrates four principal factors that collectively determine a method's environmental impact:

• Solvent Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) Impact: This component evaluates the toxicity, flammability, corrosivity, and environmental persistence of solvents used in the mobile phase [14].
• Solvent Cumulative Energy Demand (CED): This factor accounts for the total energy required for solvent production, including raw material extraction, manufacturing, and transportation, plus the energy required for waste disposal [17] [14].
• Instrument Energy Consumption: A distinctive feature of AMGS is its inclusion of the direct energy usage of chromatographic instruments during method operation [17] [13].
• Solvent Waste Generation: This parameter quantifies the volume of solvent waste produced per analysis, considering method runtime, flow rate, and purification requirements [14].

Recent Methodological refinements

Research by Armstrong and colleagues has proposed important modifications to the original AMGS formula to enhance its accuracy [61]. Their refinement incorporates the instrumental cycle time (t_c), which represents the time between the method ending and the next injection, including column re-equilibration [61]. This modification addresses a critical question in sustainable method development: "Is faster always greener?" [61]. By accounting for cycle time, the refined model demonstrates that there is an optimal flow rate that produces a minimum AMGS, which varies for different solvents, rather than AMGS continuously improving with higher flow rates [61].

Table 1: Core Components of the AMGS Calculation

Component	Description	Measurement Approach
Solvent HSE Impact	Evaluates toxicity, flammability, environmental persistence	Solvent safety/toxicity profiling [14]
Solvent Energy Demand	Cumulative energy for production and disposal	Life cycle assessment (cradle-to-grave) [17] [14]
Instrument Energy	Electricity consumption during operation	Power monitoring of HPLC/UHPLC systems [17]
Solvent Waste	Volume of waste generated per analysis	Flow rate × runtime + purification energy [14]

Strengths of AMGS

The implementation of AMGS provides several distinct advantages for organizations pursuing sustainability objectives in analytical chemistry.

Comprehensive Environmental Assessment

AMGS offers a multidimensional evaluation that captures both direct and indirect environmental impacts. Unlike simpler metrics that focus primarily on solvent toxicity or waste volume, AMGS uniquely incorporates instrumental energy consumption, acknowledging that sustainability extends beyond chemical usage to include operational efficiency [17] [13]. This comprehensive scope enables organizations to identify improvement opportunities across the entire analytical workflow.

Practical Implementation and Benchmarking

The quantitative nature of AMGS facilitates direct method comparisons and objective benchmarking across departments, sites, and even organizations [17]. Pharmaceutical companies like AstraZeneca have successfully utilized AMGS to assess their current status, influence standard practices, and create internal tools for trending data as a mode of continuous process verification [17] [13]. The metric provides a standardized framework for setting sustainability targets and measuring progress toward corporate environmental goals, such as AstraZeneca's ambition to achieve carbon zero status for analytical laboratories by 2030 [17].

Guidance for Method Development and Optimization

AMGS serves as a strategic guide for analytical chemists during method development, providing clear direction for sustainability improvements [61]. Mathematical optimization principles can be applied to minimize AMGS with respect to flow rate, revealing ideal separation speeds for different solvent systems [61]. This enables data-driven decisions regarding solvent selection, instrument parameters, and method conditions to achieve the optimal balance between analytical performance and environmental impact [17] [61].

Table 2: Key Strengths of AMGS for Chromatographic Assessment

Strength	Description	Practical Benefit
Holistic Assessment	Evaluates solvent HSE, energy demand, instrument power, and waste [17] [14]	Identifies improvement opportunities across multiple dimensions
Quantitative Benchmarking	Generates numerical score for objective comparison [17] [61]	Enables tracking of sustainability performance over time
Method Optimization	Guides development of greener methods [17] [61]	Supports achievement of corporate sustainability targets
Industry Validation	Developed by ACS-GCI with pharmaceutical industry partners [17] [61]	Ensures relevance and practicality for industrial applications

Limitations and Constraints

Despite its significant utilities, AMGS possesses several limitations that users must consider when implementing this assessment tool.

Technical Scope Limitations

A significant constraint of the current AMGS framework is its limited incorporation of critical method parameters. The metric does not adequately account for the environmental impact of chromatographic mobile phase and sample diluent additives, such as trifluoroacetic acid, which can substantially increase environmental footprints [17] [61]. Additionally, the model does not consider factors such as the need for compound derivatization, which requires additional reagents and processing steps [61]. There may also be issues with the "units" in the original AMGS metric that need resolution in future iterations [61].

Applicability Boundaries

The AMGS tool was primarily designed for chromatographic separation methods, particularly liquid chromatography techniques [17]. This focused scope may limit its effectiveness for evaluating other analytical techniques without significant modifications. Furthermore, while AMGS excels at comparing methods within the same technique, its cross-technique applicability remains uncertain, potentially restricting its utility for comprehensive laboratory assessments that employ diverse analytical technologies [17].

Practical Implementation Challenges

The current AMGS framework provides limited guidance on integrating analytical performance with environmental sustainability [60]. As with many green analytical chemistry principles, there is a risk that method greenness may be achieved at the expense of analytical performance [60]. The metric does not explicitly incorporate the principle of analytical quality, potentially creating tension between sustainability objectives and method validation requirements, especially in regulated environments like pharmaceutical quality control [17].

Application Case Study: Implementation in Pharmaceutical Development

AstraZeneca has demonstrated the practical implementation of AMGS to drive sustainable chromatographic method development across its pharmaceutical drug project portfolio [17]. Their approach employs both qualitative and quantitative assessments at departmental, drug project, and individual method levels, identifying specific methods with poor sustainability credentials and targeting them for improvement [17].

Experimental Protocol: AMGS Assessment Workflow

The following protocol outlines a comprehensive procedure for evaluating the greenness of chromatographic methods using AMGS:

Step 1: Method Parameter Collection

• Document complete chromatographic conditions: mobile phase composition, flow rate (mL/min), column dimensions (length, internal diameter, particle size), injection volume (µL), and runtime (minutes) [17] [61].
• Identify instrument model and configuration, noting any special energy consumption features [17].
• Record cycle time (t_c), defined as the time between method ending and next injection, including column re-equilibration [61].

Step 2: Solvent Data Compilation

• For each solvent in the mobile phase, gather safety data sheets with HSE classifications [14].
• Obtain cumulative energy demand values for solvent production and disposal from life cycle assessment databases [17] [14].
• Calculate total solvent consumption per analysis: Flow rate × (Runtime + Cycle time) [61].

Step 3: Energy Consumption Assessment

• Consult instrument specifications for power consumption in various operational states (active, standby) [17].
• Calculate energy usage per analysis based on runtime and power requirements [17] [13].
• For precise measurements, use power meters to record actual energy consumption during method operation [17].

Step 4: AMGS Calculation

• Input collected parameters into the AMGS calculator [14].
• Apply the modified AMGS formula incorporating cycle time for enhanced accuracy [61]:
  • Analysis time (ta) at any flow rate (F) can be calculated from initial runtime (ti) at initial flow rate (F_i)
  • Substitute into AMGS equation to examine effects of both cycle time and flow rate
• Calculate individual component scores (solvent HSE, solvent energy, instrument energy, waste generation) [17] [14].

Step 5: Interpretation and Optimization

• Compare AMGS against benchmark values for similar methods [17].
• Identify components with the largest environmental impact for targeted improvements [17] [61].
• Apply mathematical optimization to determine ideal flow rates for specific solvent systems [61].
• Implement modifications and recalculate AMGS to quantify sustainability improvements [17] [61].

AMGS Assessment Workflow: This diagram illustrates the systematic procedure for evaluating and optimizing the environmental sustainability of chromatographic methods using the Analytical Method Greenness Score.

Research Reagent Solutions for Sustainable Chromatography

Table 3: Essential Materials for Green Chromatographic Method Development

Material/Technology	Function	Sustainability Benefit
Carbonated Water-Based Eluents	Mobile phase with carbonic acid additive [61]	Reduces retention, sharpens peaks, MS-compatible, low UV-C absorption [61]
Superficially Porous Particles (SPP)	Column packing material with improved efficiency [61] [60]	Enables use of shorter columns, faster analysis, reduced solvent consumption [61]
Narrow Diameter Columns	Columns with reduced internal diameter [61]	Significantly decreases solvent waste generation while maintaining separation efficiency [61]
Bio-Based Solvents (e.g., Cyrene)	Renewable feedstock solvents [60]	Biodegradable alternatives to petrochemical solvents with favorable EHS profiles [60]
Monolithic Columns	Alternative column technology with porous structure [60]	Lower backpressure enables faster flow rates or longer columns with reduced energy [60]

The Analytical Method Greenness Score represents a significant advancement in the quantitative assessment of environmental sustainability for chromatographic methods. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive multidimensional evaluation, practical implementation for benchmarking, and guidance for method optimization. These attributes make AMGS particularly valuable for pharmaceutical companies and other industries seeking to reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining analytical quality. However, users must recognize the current limitations of AMGS, including its technical scope constraints, applicability boundaries, and challenges in balancing greenness with analytical performance. Future developments should address these limitations by expanding the assessment parameters, potentially integrating AMGS with complementary frameworks like White Analytical Chemistry that simultaneously consider environmental impact, analytical efficiency, and practical applicability [60]. As the field evolves, AMGS is poised to play an increasingly important role in standardizing sustainability assessments and driving the adoption of greener chromatographic practices throughout the analytical community.

The pharmaceutical industry faces increasing pressure to align analytical practices with environmental sustainability goals without compromising regulatory compliance or data quality. Analytical Method Validation (AMV) provides evidence that a test procedure is suitable for its intended use, ensuring the reliability, accuracy, and precision of data for product release and stability testing [62]. Simultaneously, the Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) has emerged as a metric to quantify the environmental impact of analytical methods, considering factors such as solvent consumption, energy use, and waste generation [63].

This application note provides a structured framework for integrating AMGS assessment into established method validation protocols, creating a unified approach that addresses both regulatory requirements and sustainability objectives. By implementing these complementary approaches, laboratories can significantly reduce their environmental footprint while maintaining the scientific rigor required for pharmaceutical analysis.

Theoretical Background

Fundamentals of Analytical Method Validation

Analytical method validation establishes documented evidence that a method consistently produces results that meet predetermined specifications and quality attributes. According to regulatory guidelines from ICH, USP, and FDA, key validation characteristics include:

• Accuracy and Precision: Demonstrating that the method yields results close to the true value (accuracy) with minimal variability (precision) under specified conditions [62]. Current guidelines mandate repeatability within 2.0% RSD and intermediate precision within 3.0% RSD for assays [64].

• Specificity: Proving that the method can unequivocally assess the analyte in the presence of potential interferents. Recent updates require forced degradation studies and a peak purity index of at least 0.99 [64].

• Linearity and Range: Establishing that the analytical procedure produces results directly proportional to analyte concentration within a specified range. Updated standards require R² ≥ 0.999 for assays and ≥ 0.995 for impurities [64].

• Robustness: Demonstrating method reliability despite small, deliberate variations in method parameters. Once optional, robustness testing is now mandatory under current guidelines [64].

Principles of Green Analytical Chemistry

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) aims to minimize the environmental impact of analytical procedures by reducing hazardous chemical consumption, energy usage, and waste generation [41]. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) provides a quantitative metric to assess this environmental impact, with calculations considering:

• Instrument energy consumption based on system type, run time, and number of injections
• Solvent energy intensity and environmental, health, and safety (EHS) factors
• Sample consumption and preparation methodologies [63]

The 12 principles of GAC provide a framework for implementing greener analytical methods, emphasizing waste prevention, safer chemicals, energy efficiency, and waste management [12].

Integrated Protocol: Combining AMV and AMGS Assessment

The following workflow diagram illustrates the complementary integration of AMGS assessment with traditional method validation protocols:

Phase 1: Green Method Development with AMGS Forecasting

Objective: Design analytical methods that meet both technical and environmental requirements.

Procedure:

• Define Analytical Target Profile: Specify method requirements including accuracy, precision, specificity, and quantitation limits [62].
• Select Green Parameters:
  • Choose less hazardous solvents (e.g., ethanol instead of acetonitrile) where possible
  • Implement miniaturized techniques to reduce reagent consumption
  • Optimize for shorter run times and lower temperatures to reduce energy usage
• Calculate Forecasted AMGS: Use the freely available AMGS calculator from the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable website to predict the environmental impact [63].
• Compare with Benchmarks: Evaluate the forecasted AMGS against industry benchmarks (e.g., traditional HPLC methods typically score ~110, while modernized UPLC methods can score below 30) [63].

Phase 2: Validation with Concurrent Green Metrics Collection

Objective: Execute validation protocols while systematically collecting environmental impact data.

Procedure:

• Accuracy and Precision Studies:
  • Prepare samples at 80%, 100%, and 120% of target concentration per ICH guidelines [62]
  • Document solvent volumes and energy consumption for each analysis
  • Calculate accuracy as percent recovery and precision as %RSD
  • Record total solvent consumption and instrument run time for AMGS calculation

• Specificity and Forced Degradation Studies:

  • Perform mandatory forced degradation studies under stress conditions [64]
  • Demonstrate specificity by showing no interference from degradants
  • Document all chemicals used in stress testing and their disposal methods

• Linearity and Range Assessment:

  • Prepare minimum 5 concentrations across the specified range [62]
  • Determine correlation coefficient, y-intercept, and slope of the line
  • Calculate solvent consumption per calibration curve for AMGS input

• Robustness Testing:

  • Intentionally vary critical parameters (pH, temperature, flow rate) [64]
  • Document method performance under modified conditions
  • Assess how variations affect environmental impact (e.g., higher flow rates increase solvent use)

Phase 3: Integrated Data Analysis and Reporting

Objective: Synthesize validation results and environmental metrics into a comprehensive report.

Procedure:

• Compile Validation Results: Tabulate all validation parameters against acceptance criteria
• Calculate Final AMGS: Input operational data into the AMGS calculator:
  • Number of analytes and injections
  • Instrument type (HPLC, UHPLC, UPLC) and run conditions
  • Solvent types and volumes consumed
  • Sample preparation requirements [63]
• Perform Comparative Analysis: Compare the method's AMGS with conventional approaches
• Document Green Improvements: Quantify environmental benefits such as:
  • Solvent reduction (liters/year)
  • Energy savings (kWh/year)
  • Waste reduction (liters/year)

Case Study: Method Modernization with Integrated AMV/AMGS Assessment

Experimental Background

A pharmaceutical quality control laboratory modernized the USP monograph method for naproxen sodium tablets from conventional HPLC to more advanced UPLC technology [63]. The study aimed to maintain regulatory compliance while significantly improving environmental performance.

Research Reagent Solutions and Materials

Table 1: Essential Materials and Research Reagents

Item Name	Specification	Function in Protocol
Shim-pack GIST C18 Column	150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm [65]	Chromatographic separation of analytes
Acetonitrile	HPLC Grade [63]	Mobile phase component for separation
Water	HPLC Grade [63]	Mobile phase component for separation
Glacial Acetic Acid	Reagent Grade [63]	Mobile phase modifier for pH control
Naproxen Sodium	Reference Standard [63]	System suitability and quantification standard
Methanol	HPLC Grade [65]	Sample preparation and dilution solvent

Methodology

• HPLC Conditions (Traditional Method):

  • Column: C18, 5µm (150 × 4.6 mm)
  • Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:water:glacial acetic acid (45:54:1 v/v/v)
  • Flow Rate: 1.2 mL/min
  • Run Time: 8 minutes
  • Injection Volume: 20 µL [63]

• UPLC Conditions (Modernized Method):

  • Column: C18, 1.7µm (100 × 2.1 mm)
  • Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:water:glacial acetic acid (45:54:1 v/v/v)
  • Flow Rate: 0.6 mL/min
  • Run Time: 3 minutes
  • Injection Volume: 2 µL [63]

• Validation Parameters: Assessed accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, and robustness for both methods per ICH guidelines [62] [64].

• AMGS Assessment: Calculated using the ACS Green Chemistry Institute calculator with inputs for solvent consumption, energy use, and waste generation [63].

Results and Discussion

Table 2: Comparative Method Validation and Greenness Assessment

Parameter	Traditional HPLC	Modernized UPLC	Acceptance Criteria
Accuracy (% Recovery)	99.5-101.2%	98.9-101.5%	98.0-102.0%
Precision (%RSD)	1.2%	1.5%	≤2.0%
Linearity (R²)	0.9992	0.9995	≥0.999
Specificity	No interference	No interference	No interference
Analysis Time	8 minutes	1 minute	-
Solvent Consumption/Run	9.6 mL	1.8 mL	-
Injection Volume	20 µL	2 µL	-
AMGS Score	110	27	Lower is better

The validation data confirmed that both methods met all regulatory requirements for accuracy, precision, specificity, and linearity [62] [64]. However, the environmental assessment revealed substantial differences. The modernized UPLC method achieved a significantly lower (better) AMGS of 27 compared to 110 for the traditional HPLC approach [63].

This 75% improvement in greenness score primarily resulted from reduced solvent consumption (81% decrease) and shorter analysis time (88% reduction). The instrument energy score, which factors in system type, run times, and number of injections, was the major contributor to this improvement [63].

Strategic Implementation Framework

Protocol for Existing Method Modernization

For laboratories seeking to improve the sustainability of validated methods without complete revalidation:

• Apply USP General Chapter <621> Principles: Utilize allowed modifications for scaling methods to newer instrumentation [63]
• Maintain Chromatographic Performance: Ensure key parameters (resolution, selectivity) remain equivalent or improve
• Verify System Suitability: Confirm all criteria are met before implementation
• Document Environmental Benefits: Quantify reductions in solvent use, energy consumption, and waste generation

Comprehensive Greenness Assessment

While AMGS provides a valuable single metric, a complete environmental assessment should incorporate complementary tools:

• AGREEprep: Specifically evaluates sample preparation environmental impact [12] [41]
• GEMAM: Provides a pictogram with qualitative and quantitative greenness information [12]
• Analytical Eco-Scale: Applies penalty points to non-green attributes [41]

These tools address limitations of individual metrics and provide a multidimensional view of method sustainability [41].

The integration of AMGS assessment with traditional method validation protocols represents a significant advancement in pharmaceutical analysis, enabling simultaneous achievement of regulatory compliance and sustainability objectives. The case study demonstrates that modernization of established methods can yield substantial environmental benefits—reducing solvent consumption by 81% and improving AMGS by 75%—while maintaining all required validation parameters [63].

This complementary approach provides a structured framework for laboratories to quantitatively document and improve their environmental performance, supporting the pharmaceutical industry's transition toward more sustainable analytical practices without compromising data quality or regulatory compliance.

The pharmaceutical industry is increasingly prioritizing Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) principles to minimize the environmental impact of analytical methods. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) has emerged as a crucial metric for quantifying the environmental friendliness of these procedures [66]. This case study examines the application of AMGS within High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) method development, focusing on a direct comparison between normal-phase (NP) and reversed-phase (RP) techniques for pharmaceutical analysis. HPTLC presents inherent green advantages over traditional HPLC, including reduced solvent consumption, lower energy demands, and minimal waste generation [67]. The integration of AMGS provides a standardized framework to objectively evaluate and compare the sustainability of analytical methods, supporting the industry's alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) [67].

Comparative Case Study: NP-HPTLC vs. RP-HPTLC for Pharmaceutical Analysis

A rigorous comparative study was conducted to analyze Ertugliflozin (ERZ), an antidiabetic medication, using both NP-HPTLC and RP-HPTLC techniques [68]. This research is particularly significant as it represents the first reported HPTLC methods for ERZ analysis, filling a gap in the existing literature.

• NP-HPTLC Method: Utilized silica gel 60 NP-18F254S plates with a chloroform/methanol (85:15 v/v) mobile phase.
• RP-HPTLC Method: Employed silica gel 60 RP-18F254S plates with an ethanol-water (80:20 v/v) mobile phase.

Both methods demonstrated stability-indicating properties, effectively analyzing ERZ even in the presence of degradation products, which is essential for assessing product shelf-life and stability [68].

Analytical Performance Comparison

The analytical performance of both methods was validated according to International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Q2(R2) guidelines, with key metrics summarized in Table 1 [68].

Table 1: Analytical Performance Metrics for NP-HPTLC and RP-HPTLC Methods

Parameter	NP-HPTLC Method	RP-HPTLC Method
Stationary Phase	Silica gel 60 NP-18F254S	Silica gel 60 RP-18F254S
Mobile Phase	Chloroform/Methanol (85:15 v/v)	Ethanol-Water (80:20 v/v)
Linear Range (ng/band)	50–600	25–1200
Tailing Factor (As)	1.06 ± 0.02	1.08 ± 0.03
Theoretical Plates per Meter (N/m)	4472 ± 4.22	4652 ± 4.02
Robustness	Lower	Higher
Accuracy (Assay % in tablets)	87.41%	99.28%

The RP-HPTLC method demonstrated superior analytical performance with a wider linear range, better accuracy, and higher robustness compared to the NP-HPTLC approach [68].

Greenness Assessment Using Multiple Metrics

The greenness profiles of both methods were evaluated using four distinct assessment tools: National Environmental Method Index (NEMI), Analytical Eco-Scale (AES), ChlorTox, and Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) [68]. The results, summarized in Table 2, provide a comprehensive environmental comparison.

Table 2: Greenness Assessment of NP-HPTLC and RP-HPTLC Methods

Greenness Metric	NP-HPTLC Method	RP-HPTLC Method	Interpretation
NEMI	Not Reported	Better Profile	RP-HPTLC is greener
Analytical Eco-Scale (AES)	Not Reported	Better Profile	RP-HPTLC is greener
ChlorTox	Not Reported	Better Profile	RP-HPTLC is greener
AGREE	Not Reported	Better Profile	RP-HPTLC is greener
Overall Greenness Conclusion	Less Green	More Green	RP-HPTLC is more environmentally sustainable

The results from all four greenness assessment tools consistently demonstrated that the RP-HPTLC strategy was greener than both the NP-HPTLC approach and other reported HPLC techniques [68]. The superior greenness of the RP-HPTLC method can be attributed to its use of ethanol-water as the mobile phase, which is more environmentally friendly than the chloroform-methanol system used in NP-HPTLC.

Detailed Experimental Protocols

HPTLC Instrumentation and General Procedure

The following instrumentation and general procedure form the foundation for HPTLC method development and can be adapted for various applications [67]:

• Stationary Phase: HPTLC silica gel 60 Fâ‚‚â‚…â‚„ plates (20 × 20 cm, 0.2 mm thickness), often trimmed to 10 × 10 cm for enhanced separation efficiency.
• Sample Application: Use an automated applicator (e.g., Camag Linomat 5) fitted with a 100 μL syringe. Apply samples as 8 mm bands with specific intervals (e.g., 10 mm) to ensure analytical reproducibility.
• Chromatographic Development: Perform in an automated development chamber (e.g., Camag ADC2) under controlled environmental conditions (25 ± 0.5°C, 40 ± 2% relative humidity) with a 25-minute pre-saturation period to ensure mobile phase vapour equilibrium.
• Densitometric Measurement: Execute using a TLC scanner (e.g., Camag TLC Scanner 3) in reflectance-absorbance mode. Configure with 8 × 0.1 mm slit dimension and operate at a scanning speed of 100 nm/s.
• Data Analysis: Process using specialized planar chromatography software (e.g., WinCATS version 3.15) for data acquisition and chromatographic parameter optimization.

Protocol for RP-HPTLC Method for Ertugliflozin

Based on the case study, the following protocol is recommended for developing a green RP-HPTLC method [68]:

• Mobile Phase Preparation: Prepare ethanol-water (80:20 v/v) in a calibrated flask. Mix thoroughly and degas using an ultrasonic bath for 10 minutes.
• Standard Solution Preparation: Accurately weigh 10 mg of ERZ reference standard and transfer to a 10 mL volumetric flask. Dissolve and dilute to volume with methanol to obtain a stock solution of 1 mg/mL. Prepare working standards by serial dilution.
• Sample Preparation: For tablet formulations, weigh and powder not less than 20 tablets. Transfer an accurately weighed portion of the powder equivalent to 10 mg of ERZ to a 10 mL volumetric flask. Add 7 mL of methanol, sonicate for 15 minutes, dilute to volume with methanol, and filter.
• Chromatographic Procedure: Apply samples and standards to the RP-HPTLC plate as 8 mm bands. Develop the plate in a saturated chamber with the mobile phase over a migration distance of 80 mm. Dry the plate completely and scan at 199 nm.
• Validation: Validate the method according to ICH Q2(R2) guidelines for parameters including specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and robustness.

Protocol for Salivary Caffeine Analysis Using HPTLC

This protocol demonstrates the application of HPTLC in bioanalysis, specifically for caffeine quantification in saliva [69] [70]:

• Mobile Phase Preparation: Prepare acetone/toluene/chloroform (4:3:3, v/v/v) in a calibrated flask. Mix thoroughly.
• Saliva Sample Processing: Centrifuge saliva samples at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes. Dilute the supernatant 1:1 with methanol, vortex for 30 seconds, and centrifuge again. Use the resulting clear supernatant for analysis.
• Standard Solution Preparation: Prepare a caffeine stock solution of 1 mg/mL in methanol. Prepare working standards in the range of 20-100 ng/band by serial dilution.
• Chromatographic Procedure: Apply samples and standards to HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 plates. Develop the plate in a saturated chamber with the mobile phase. Dry the plate and scan at 275 nm (λmax for caffeine).
• Method Validation: Establish linearity in the 20-100 ng/band range, with expected LOD and LOQ values of 2.42 and 7.34 ng/band, respectively. Validate accuracy, precision, and robustness according to ICH guidelines.

Workflow and AMGS Integration Diagram

HPTLC Method Development with AMGS Assessment

AMGS Calculation Methodology Diagram

AMGS Calculation and Evaluation Workflow

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for HPTLC Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Example Specifications
HPTLC Silica Gel Plates	Stationary phase for compound separation	Silica gel 60 F₂₅₄, 20 × 20 cm, 0.2 mm thickness [67]
Ethanol (Green Solvent)	Environmentally friendly mobile phase component	Ethanol-water (80:20 v/v) for RP-HPTLC [68]
Chloroform (Hazardous Solvent)	Traditional mobile phase component (less green)	Chloroform-methanol (85:15 v/v) for NP-HPTLC [68]
Methanol	Sample preparation and extraction	Used for sample dilution and standard preparation [69]
Acetone	Mobile phase component for mid-polarity separations	Acetone/toluene/chloroform (4:3:3 v/v/v) for caffeine analysis [69]
Reference Standards	Method validation and quantification	Certified reference materials for target analytes [68]

This case study demonstrates the significant value of integrating AMGS into HPTLC method development for pharmaceutical analysis. The direct comparison between NP-HPTLC and RP-HPTLC methods for ertugliflozin analysis revealed that the RP-HPTLC method outperformed its NP counterpart in both analytical performance and greenness metrics [68]. The RP-HPTLC method showed superior linearity, accuracy, precision, and sensitivity while utilizing a more environmentally sustainable ethanol-water mobile phase system.

The consistent findings across multiple greenness assessment tools (NEMI, AES, ChlorTox, and AGREE) confirm that RP-HPTLC represents a greener approach for pharmaceutical analysis compared to NP-HPTLC and traditional HPLC methods [68]. This comprehensive evaluation framework provides researchers with a standardized approach to quantify and improve the environmental sustainability of their analytical methods while maintaining high analytical standards.

The implementation of AMGS and complementary greenness assessment tools enables systematic evaluation of method environmental impacts, supporting the pharmaceutical industry's transition toward more sustainable analytical practices that align with global sustainability initiatives and United Nations Development Goals [67].

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) is a metric designed to compare the environmental impact of analytical methods during development [5]. It serves as a general guideline rather than an absolute measure, with a fundamental principle: the lower the AMGS, the greener the method [5]. This tool is particularly crucial in pharmaceutical and drug development research, where it fosters awareness of environmental impact and encourages analysts to develop more sustainable methodologies [5].

The AMGS calculation holistically evaluates several factors to benchmark methods against each other. The metric integrates [5]:

• Solvent impact: Assessing health, safety, and environmental factors.
• Energy demand: Cumulative energy requirements for solvents and instrument operation.
• Operational waste: Solvent waste generated during method execution.

The score employs a color-coding system (yellow and red) to highlight specific areas—such as excessive instrument energy usage—where improvements can be made, thus guiding scientists toward more sustainable method development [5].

Planned Enhancements and Future Roadmap

The American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute's Pharmaceutical Roundtable (ACS GCI PR) actively maintains and enhances the AMGS calculator. A significant expansion of its capabilities is on the horizon.

Official Support for Gas Chromatography (GC) Methods

The most significant confirmed future enhancement is the extension of AMGS to Gas Chromatography.

• Current Limitation: The present version of the AMGS calculator is exclusively for determining greenness scores for Liquid Chromatography (LC) and Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC) methods [5].
• Planned Release: The ACS GCI PR Analytical Focus Team is actively developing this update, with an expected release by early 2026 [5].

This development will provide a standardized and much-needed tool for the greenness assessment of a vast array of GC-based methods, aligning with the broader scientific push towards applying green chemistry principles to all chromatographic techniques [71].

The Imperative for Green Gas Chromatography

The upcoming AMGS support for GC addresses a critical need in analytical chemistry. The fundamental principles of green chemistry champion the elimination of derivatization steps and the reduction of energy and material consumption, all of which are directly applicable to GC [71]. Key areas where GC methods can be made more sustainable, and which the future AMGS will likely assess, include [71]:

• Carrier Gas Selection: Helium, the most common carrier gas, faces supply shortages and is obtained as a byproduct of fossil fuel production, making it unsustainable. Nitrogen is often a greener alternative with comparable performance in temperature-programmed analyses, followed by hydrogen, with helium being the least sustainable choice [71].
• Instrument Miniaturization: Using smaller, modern GC systems reduces laboratory footprint, heat generation, and power consumption [71].
• System Thinking: A holistic view of the entire analytical process, from sample preparation to data analysis, is crucial for identifying and mitigating unintended environmental consequences [71].

Table 1: Key Areas for Improving GC Greenness

Area of Optimization	Current Common Practice	Greener Alternative
Carrier Gas	Helium	Nitrogen or Hydrogen
Instrument Size	Standard Benchtop GC	Miniaturized GC Systems
Sample Preparation	Solvent-intensive extraction	Solvent-less or miniaturized techniques (e.g., SPME)
Method Objective	Stand-alone analysis	Multi-analyte methods

Experimental Protocol: Implementing and Minimizing AMGS in Method Development

This protocol provides a detailed methodology for researchers to incorporate AMGS evaluation into their analytical method development workflow, with strategies for score minimization. A case study on amino acid enantioseparations is referenced to illustrate the application [72].

Stage 1: Initial Method Setup and Green Principles

• Define Analytical Goal: Clearly state the method's required figures of merit (e.g., resolution, sensitivity).
• Select Inherently Greener Techniques: Prioritize techniques with lower inherent environmental impact where possible (e.g., SFC over normal-phase HPLC, or capillary GC over packed-column GC).
• Choose Green Solvents/Eluents: For LC, opt for water, carbonated water [72], ethanol, or other solvents with favorable health and environmental profiles. For GC, prefer carrier gases like nitrogen over helium [71].
• Optimize Sample Preparation: Design sample preparation to use minimal or non-toxic solvents, employing techniques like Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) to reduce waste [71].

Stage 2: Instrumental and Operational Optimization

• Column Selection: Use narrow-diameter columns with superficially porous particles. This can reduce solvent waste dramatically—e.g., a 12-fold reduction has been demonstrated in HPLC [72].
• Mathematical Optimization of Flow Rate: The AMGS can be mathematically minimized with respect to flow rate. The ideal separation speed and corresponding flow rate depend on the solvent composition and must be determined for each method [72].
• Minimize Cycle Time: The "cycle time" (the total time from one injection to the next, including re-equilibration) is a critical factor. A modified AMGS formula incorporating cycle time provides a more accurate picture of solvent waste generation in high-throughput analyses. Shortening the run time and optimizing gradient re-equilibration can significantly lower the AMGS [5] [72].

Stage 3: Evaluation and Iteration

• Calculate the AMGS: Use the official ACS GCI PR AMGS calculator or perform the calculation based on the published methodology [5] [72].
• Interpret the Score and Color Code: Analyze the total score and the color-coded breakdown. A yellow or red indicator in "Instrument Energy" suggests shortening the run time, while a red "Solvent" score prompts a review of solvent choice and volume [5].
• Iterate and Improve: Use the AMGS feedback to refine the method parameters and repeat the calculation until an optimal balance between analytical performance and greenness is achieved.

Table 2: Strategies for AMGS Minimization with Expected Outcomes

Optimization Strategy	Specific Action	Expected Impact on AMGS
Solvent/Eluent System	Use carbonated water as a modifier [72]	Lowers solvent safety and waste components
Column Geometry	Switch to narrow-bore columns with SPP [72]	Drastically reduces solvent waste volume
Method Speed	Implement ultrafast separations (<15 s) [72]	Reduces instrument energy and solvent waste
System Throughput	Minimize cycle time between injections [72]	Lowers the solvent waste per unit time

Case Study: Ultrafast Amino Acid Chiral Separations

• Achievement: Implementation of the above strategies enabled AMGS values as low as 1.2 for ultrafast enantioseparations.
• Key Insight: In these high-throughput scenarios, the cycle time contributed 79% to the total AMGS, highlighting its dominance over other factors in fast-cycling methods [72].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

The following reagents and materials are critical for developing greener analytical methods and achieving low AMGS values.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green Method Development

Reagent/Material	Function in Green Method Development
Carbonated Water (H₂CO₃*)	A green additive for mobile phases; improves chromatographic figures of merit (resolution, efficiency) in HPLC while lowering environmental impact [72].
Superficially Porous Particle (SPP) Columns	Chromatography columns that provide high efficiency, allowing for the use of shorter columns or faster flow rates, thereby reducing solvent consumption [72].
Nitrogen Generator	System to produce nitrogen carrier gas for GC, eliminating reliance on helium and improving method sustainability [71].
Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Equipment	A solvent-free or solvent-limited sample preparation technique that minimizes hazardous waste generation [71].
Hydrogen Generator	An alternative to helium and nitrogen for GC carrier gas; offers faster separations but requires careful handling and additional capital cost [71].

Workflow and Logical Diagrams

The following diagram visualizes the strategic workflow for developing an analytical method with an optimized Analytical Method Greenness Score.

Diagram 1: AMGS Method Development Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the core components that contribute to the AMGS calculation, highlighting the interconnected factors a scientist must balance.

Diagram 2: Core Factors Comprising the AMGS

For researchers and drug development professionals, the adoption of greener analytical methods is no longer merely an ethical consideration but a practical necessity. However, replacing a well-established analytical method with a more sustainable alternative requires a rigorous demonstration of method equivalency—proof that the green method performs at least as well as the original while reducing environmental impact. This process balances the fundamental requirements of analytical performance with the growing imperative of environmental sustainability.

The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) provides a quantitative framework for this assessment. Developed from a collaboration between Bristol-Myers Squibb and the American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute's Pharmaceutical Roundtable, the AMGS calculator serves as a key metric to benchmark and compare the environmental impact of analytical methods, factoring in solvent health, safety, environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, and solvent waste [5]. Integrating AMGS within a structured equivalency protocol ensures that sustainability advancements do not compromise the data quality required for regulatory compliance and scientific decision-making.

Theoretical Foundation: Analytical Method Validation & Greenness Assessment

Core Pillars of Analytical Method Validation

Before establishing equivalency, a method must first be validated. Analytical method validation is the process of proving that an analytical procedure is suitable for its intended purpose, ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of generated data [73]. The International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines define key validation parameters that form the basis for any performance comparison.

Table 1: Key Validation Parameters for Establishing Method Equivalency

Validation Parameter	Definition	Role in Equivalency Assessment
Accuracy	Closeness of test results to the true value.	The green method must demonstrate comparable accuracy to the original method, typically via recovery studies on known standards.
Precision	Degree of agreement among individual test results.	Both repeatability (same day, same analyst) and intermediate precision (different days, analysts, equipment) must be statistically equivalent.
Specificity	Ability to measure the analyte unequivocally in the presence of other components.	Chromatographic resolution and peak purity must be maintained with the new method conditions.
Linearity & Range	The ability to obtain results proportional to analyte concentration within a specified range.	The green method must demonstrate a similar linear range with a correlation coefficient (R²) meeting acceptance criteria.
Robustness	Capacity to remain unaffected by small, deliberate variations in method parameters.	Evaluates the method's resilience to minor changes in green conditions (e.g., mobile phase pH, temperature).

Principles and Metrics of Green Analytical Chemistry

Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) aims to mitigate the adverse effects of analytical activities on the environment and human health [3]. Its framework is built upon 12 principles that advocate for direct analysis techniques, reduced sample size, waste minimization, safer solvents, and energy efficiency [49].

To operationalize these principles, several metrics have been developed to quantitatively assess a method's environmental footprint:

• Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS): This metric factors in solvent health, safety, environmental impact, cumulative energy demand, instrument energy usage, and method solvent waste to provide a benchmark for comparison. A lower AMGS score indicates a greener method [5].
• Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) Metric: This tool uses the 12 principles of GAC as its foundation, providing a score between 0 and 1 presented in an intuitive radial diagram [49] [41].
• Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI): A semi-quantitative tool that employs a color-coded pictogram to assess the environmental impact of each step in an analytical workflow [41].
• Analytical Eco-Scale: A penalty-points-based system where an ideal green analysis scores 100 points; points are subtracted for hazardous reagents, energy consumption, and waste generation [3].

The emerging concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) seeks to balance the red (analytical performance), green (ecological impact), and blue (practicality and cost-effectiveness) aspects, providing a holistic view of a method's suitability [39].

Application Notes: A Protocol for Establishing Equivalency

This protocol provides a step-by-step workflow for systematically demonstrating equivalence between a conventional method and a proposed greener alternative.

Experimental Design and Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for establishing method equivalency, integrating both performance validation and greenness assessment.

Phase 1: Green Method Development and Optimization

Objective: To design an analytical method that reduces environmental impact while maintaining core performance characteristics.

Materials and Reagents:

• Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) and placebo materials.
• HPLC/UHPLC-grade solvents. Prioritize safer, bio-based solvents like ethanol or water [74] [39] over hazardous solvents like acetonitrile.
• Chromatographic columns. Consider columns with smaller internal diameters (e.g., 2.1 mm ID vs. 4.6 mm ID) to reduce solvent consumption [74].
• Instrumentation. Modern UHPLC systems capable of operating at high pressures with minimal dwell volume, or alternative platforms like Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC) [75].

Procedure:

• Substitute Hazardous Solvents: Replace toxic solvents (e.g., acetonitrile, methanol) with greener alternatives. Ethanol, a bio-based solvent, is a prime candidate for reversed-phase chromatography [39]. Supercritical COâ‚‚ is the preferred mobile phase for SFC [75].
• Optimize Method Parameters: Utilize Quality-by-Design (QbD) principles and Design of Experiments (DoE) to systematically optimize critical method parameters [39].
  • Factor Screening: Identify factors with the most significant impact on critical quality attributes (CQAs) like resolution and analysis time.
  • Response Surface Methodology: Model the relationship between factors and responses to find the optimal method conditions.
• Miniaturize and Scale-Down: Reduce column dimensions and flow rates proportionally to minimize solvent consumption and waste generation without sacrificing efficiency [74].

Phase 2: Analytical Performance Validation

Objective: To comprehensively validate the analytical performance of the green method against regulatory standards (e.g., ICH Q2(R1)).

Procedure:

• Specificity: Inject blank, placebo, standard, and sample solutions. Demonstrate that the analyte peak is pure and free from interference from other components, excipients, or degradation products. Use diode array detection or mass spectrometry for peak purity confirmation.
• Linearity and Range: Prepare and analyze analyte solutions at a minimum of five concentration levels across the specified range (e.g., 50-150% of target concentration). Plot peak response versus concentration and calculate the regression line, correlation coefficient (R²), y-intercept, and slope. R² should be >0.998.
• Accuracy: Perform recovery studies by analyzing samples spiked with known quantities of the analyte at three levels (e.g., 80%, 100%, 120%) in triplicate. Calculate the mean recovery percentage for each level, which should be within 98.0-102.0%.
• Precision:
  • Repeatability: Analyze six independent sample preparations at 100% concentration by the same analyst under the same conditions. The relative standard deviation (RSD) should be ≤2.0%.
  • Intermediate Precision: Repeat the precision study on a different day, with a different analyst, and/or on a different instrument. The combined RSD from both studies should be ≤2.0%.
• Robustness: Deliberately introduce small variations in critical method parameters (e.g., mobile phase pH ±0.1 units, column temperature ±2°C, flow rate ±5%). Evaluate the impact on system suitability criteria to ensure the method remains reliable under normal operational variations.

Phase 3: Greenness Assessment and Equivalency Study

Objective: To quantitatively assess the environmental benefits of the new method and statistically demonstrate its equivalence to the original method.

Procedure:

• Calculate Greenness Metrics:
  • AMGS Calculation: Input data (flow rate, run time, mobile phase composition, sample preparation solvent volumes) into the AMGS calculator [5]. Record the score and note areas highlighted for improvement (e.g., high instrument energy in yellow/red).
  • AGREE Assessment: Use the AGREE metric software, inputting information aligned with the 12 GAC principles to generate a score between 0 and 1 and a visual radial diagram [41].
  • Comparative Analysis: Compare the AMGS and AGREE scores of the green method against the original method. Target a significant reduction in AMGS and an increase in the AGREE score.

• Conformal Equivalency Study:
  • Sample Selection: Select a representative set of samples (e.g., 15-30 batches) covering the expected product variability.
  • Analysis: Analyze all samples using both the original (reference) and new (test) methods in a randomized sequence to avoid bias.
  • Statistical Analysis: Perform a paired statistical comparison (e.g., using a t-test on the difference between means) and linear regression (Test result vs. Reference result).
  • Acceptance Criteria: Equivalency is demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between methods falls within a pre-defined acceptance range (e.g., ±2.0%), and the regression line has a slope close to 1 and an intercept close to 0.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Solutions

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Green HPLC Method Development

Item	Function & Rationale
Ethanol (HPLC Grade)	A bio-based, less toxic primary alternative to acetonitrile and methanol in reversed-phase chromatography [74] [39].
Water (HPLC Grade)	The greenest solvent. Elevated temperature (subcritical water) can enhance its elution strength, reducing the need for organic modifiers [74].
Supercritical COâ‚‚	The primary mobile phase for SFC. It is non-flammable, non-toxic, and can be sourced as a by-product of other industries, making it highly sustainable [75].
Formic Acid (Bio-Based)	A volatile acid for mobile phase pH adjustment. Sourcing bio-based versions further enhances green credentials.
Columns with Smaller ID	Columns with 2.1 mm or smaller internal diameters directly reduce mobile phase consumption and waste generation per analysis [74].
Green Solvent Selection Tool (GSST)	A free online tool to evaluate and compare the sustainability profile of different solvents, aiding in informed selection during method development [39].

The transition to sustainable analytical practices is imperative. By following a structured protocol that rigorously validates analytical performance while quantitatively assessing environmental impact using tools like the AMGS, scientists can confidently establish method equivalency. This approach not only fulfills regulatory and quality requirements but also actively contributes to corporate sustainability goals and the broader objective of reducing the environmental footprint of the pharmaceutical industry. The integration of Green Chemistry principles with robust analytical science, as exemplified in this protocol, paves the way for a future where data integrity and environmental responsibility are inextricably linked.

Industry Adoption Trends and Standardization Efforts

The pharmaceutical industry is experiencing a significant transformation driven by increased awareness of environmental impacts associated with drug development and manufacturing. Within this shift, green analytical chemistry has emerged as a pivotal discipline for minimizing the environmental footprint of pharmaceutical processes. The ability to quantitatively measure the environmental impact of analytical methods, particularly chromatography, has become critical for sustainability goals. The Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) has emerged as a comprehensive metric developed by the American Chemical Society's Green Chemistry Institute in collaboration with industry partners to evaluate the environmental impact of chromatographic methods across multiple dimensions [13] [76].

This application note examines the current industry adoption trends and standardization efforts surrounding AMGS implementation. As sustainability considerations gain prominence, pharmaceutical organizations are increasingly adopting AMGS to benchmark methods, drive greener method development, and systematically improve their sustainability profiles [14] [13]. We present quantitative data on implementation trends, detailed protocols for AMGS integration, and visualization of workflow relationships to support researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals in their green chemistry initiatives.

Current Adoption Trends in the Pharmaceutical Industry

The implementation of AMGS within pharmaceutical companies represents a strategic approach to quantifying and improving the environmental sustainability of analytical methods. Major organizations are leveraging this tool to assess current status, influence standard practices, and create internal tools for continuous process verification [13] [76].

Quantitative Adoption Metrics

Table 1: AMGS Implementation Trends in Pharmaceutical Organizations

Adoption Aspect	Current Implementation Status	Data Source
Primary Use Case	Method comparison during development; environmental impact awareness	[14] [5]
Industry Application	Used by multiple major pharmaceutical companies including AstraZeneca	[13] [76]
Technology Scope	Currently supports Liquid Chromatography and SFC; GC support planned for 2026	[5]
Implementation Level	Integrated into routine analytical procedures; internal tool development	[13]
Strategic Impact	Systematic sustainability improvement; hazardous waste reduction	[13] [76]

AstraZeneca has emerged as a pioneer in utilizing AMGS to assess current status, influence standard practices, and create internal tools that trend data as a mode of continuous process verification [13]. This systematic approach enables organizations to not only benchmark current methods but also track improvements over time, creating a data-driven framework for sustainability enhancement in analytical development.

Greenness Score Comparisons Across Methodologies

Table 2: AMGS Performance Across Chromatographic Methods

Method Type	Technology Platform	Key Greenness Factors	Impact on AMGS
Traditional HPLC	Conventional HPLC systems	Higher solvent consumption; longer run times; higher energy usage	Higher (Less Green) score
Modernized UHPLC	Sub-2µm columns; UHPLC systems	Reduced solvent usage; shorter run times; lower energy consumption	Lower (Greener) score [77]
SFC Methods	Supercritical fluid chromatography	Typically uses CO2 as main solvent; reduced organic solvent consumption	Lower (Greener) score [14]

The application of AMGS to modernize United States Pharmacopeia (USP) monographs demonstrates its practical implementation. For the USP monograph method for naproxen sodium tablets, modernization and application of sub-2µm columns provided not only improvements to throughput and solvent usage but also drastically improved AMGS values [77]. This case study exemplifies how legacy methods can be reevaluated using greenness metrics to achieve both environmental and operational benefits.

Standardization and Methodological Framework

The AMGS calculator was developed from a Microsoft Excel-based program first created at Bristol-Myers Squibb and further refined through collaboration by members of the American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable's Analytical Chemistry team [5]. This collaborative origin underscores the pharmaceutical industry's commitment to standardizing greenness assessment.

AMGS Calculation Methodology

The AMGS metric incorporates multiple environmental dimensions:

• Solvent impact factors: Health, safety, and environmental impact of solvents, plus cumulative energy demand for production and disposal [14] [5]
• Instrument energy usage: Direct measurement of energy consumption during method operation [14] [13]
• Method solvent waste: Waste generated throughout the analytical process [14] [5]

The metric employs color coding as a guideline that indicates if a specific energy score contributes disproportionately to the total AMGS percentage. Yellow and red colors highlight areas where the method could be improved, enabling scientists to focus optimization efforts on the most impactful parameters [5].

Complementary Assessment Frameworks

While AMGS provides a specialized metric for chromatographic methods, it exists within a broader ecosystem of greenness assessment tools. The field has progressed from basic tools like the National Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) to more comprehensive frameworks including the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Analytical Greenness (AGREE) metric, and the recently introduced White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) approach [41]. This progression highlights the growing importance of integrating environmental responsibility into analytical science.

The White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) framework deserves particular attention as it expands assessment beyond environmental considerations alone. WAC combines environmental, analytical, and practical viewpoints through 12 principles as an alternative to the 12 GAC principles, using an RGB model where Red evaluates analytical performance, Green assesses ecological impact, and Blue evaluates practical economic efficiency [39] [41]. This holistic approach enables a more balanced assessment of method suitability across multiple critical dimensions.

Experimental Protocols for AMGS Implementation

Protocol 1: AMGS Calculation for Liquid Chromatography Methods

Purpose: To standardize the calculation of Analytical Method Greenness Score for liquid chromatography methods to enable objective comparison of environmental impact.

Materials:

• AMGS calculator (available via ACS Green Chemistry Institute)
• Chromatographic system data (flow rate, run time, solvent composition)
• Sample preparation details (volumes, solvents, concentrations)

Procedure:

• System Parameter Documentation
  • Record chromatographic flow rate (mL/min)
  • Document total method run time (minutes)
  • Note column dimensions (length, internal diameter, particle size)
  • Record column temperature and any gradient profile

• Mobile Phase Composition

  • Quantify exact proportions of all solvents in mobile phase
  • Identify specific solvent types (acetonitrile, methanol, water, buffers)
  • Note buffer concentrations and additives

• Sample Preparation Input

  • Document all solvents and volumes used in sample preparation
  • Include system suitability test preparation details
  • Account for serial dilution volumes if applicable
  • For sensitivity solutions, include total volume of all dilutions

• AMGS Calculator Input

  • Enter all recorded parameters into AMGS calculator
  • Review color-coded output to identify major contributors to environmental impact
  • Record individual scores for solvent impact, instrument energy, and waste

• Interpretation and Optimization

  • Identify parameters highlighted in yellow or red as optimization priorities
  • Evaluate opportunities for solvent substitution or reduction
  • Consider method transfer to more modern instrumentation if available
  • Compare AMGS across method variants to select greenest approach

Validation: Ensure all input parameters accurately reflect the actual method conditions. Verify that system suitability test preparations are properly accounted for, particularly when serial dilutions are employed [5].

Protocol 2: Strategic Implementation for Method Development Workflow

Purpose: To integrate AMGS assessment systematically into the analytical method development process within pharmaceutical quality by design (QbD) frameworks.

Materials:

• AMGS calculator
• Method development data
• Design of Experiments (DoE) software (optional)
• Green Solvent Selection Tool (GSST)

Procedure:

• Initial Method Scoping
  • Define analytical target profile and critical quality attributes
  • Identify regulatory requirements and method constraints
  • Establish acceptable method performance criteria

• Green-by-Design Principles Application

  • Apply Green Solvent Selection Tool to identify preferred solvents [39]
  • Incorporate green chemistry principles during initial method design
  • Consider environmental impact alongside technical performance

• DoE with Greenness Optimization

  • Structure experimental design to include environmental factors
  • Vary parameters with significant environmental impact (run time, flow rate, temperature)
  • Include AMGS as a response variable in addition to performance metrics

• Concurrent AMGS Assessment

  • Calculate AMGS for each method variant in the experimental design
  • Correlate AMGS with critical performance attributes (resolution, sensitivity)
  • Identify method conditions that balance greenness with technical requirements

• Holistic Method Selection

  • Apply White Analytical Chemistry assessment using RGB model [39]
  • Evaluate methods across analytical (red), environmental (green), and practical (blue) dimensions
  • Select optimal method based on comprehensive assessment

Validation: The integration of AMGS with QbD and DoE approaches should demonstrate that greener methods maintain or improve analytical performance while reducing environmental impact [39].

Visualization of AMGS Implementation Workflow

Figure 1: AMGS Implementation Workflow. This diagram illustrates the systematic process for integrating AMGS assessment into analytical method development, highlighting the iterative nature of greenness optimization.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Tools for Green Method Development

Tool/Reagent	Function in Green Method Development	Application Context
AMGS Calculator	Quantitative metric for environmental impact of chromatographic methods	Method comparison and optimization during development [14] [5]
Green Solvent Selection Tool (GSST)	Evaluates solvent sustainability; provides composite score (G) from 1-10	Solvent selection during method design [39]
Ethanol (99.8%)	Green alternative to acetonitrile in reversed-phase chromatography	Mobile phase composition for HPLC methods [39]
Sub-2µm Chromatography Columns	Enables faster separations with reduced solvent consumption	Method modernization and transfer from traditional HPLC [77]
White Analytical Chemistry (WAC) RGB Model	Holistic assessment balancing analytical, environmental, and practical factors	Comprehensive method evaluation and selection [39] [41]

The pharmaceutical industry's adoption of Analytical Method Greenness Score represents a significant step toward standardizing sustainability assessment in analytical chemistry. The trends indicate a movement from isolated applications to systematic integration within quality by design frameworks and method development workflows. As standardization efforts continue through organizations like the ACS Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable, AMGS is poised to become an increasingly important metric for driving environmental improvements in pharmaceutical analysis.

The ongoing development of AMGS, including planned support for gas chromatography by early 2026 [5], demonstrates the commitment to expanding and refining greenness assessment capabilities. When implemented according to the protocols outlined in this application note and combined with complementary tools like White Analytical Chemistry, AMGS provides researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals with a robust framework for achieving both scientific excellence and environmental responsibility.

Conclusion

The implementation of AMGS represents a paradigm shift in analytical method development, moving sustainability from an abstract concept to a quantifiable, actionable metric. By systematically assessing solvent impact, energy consumption, and waste generation, AMGS empowers pharmaceutical researchers and drug development professionals to make informed decisions that significantly reduce the environmental footprint of quality control operations. The foundational principles establish why AMGS matters, the methodological application provides the 'how-to,' optimization strategies enable continuous improvement, and comparative validation positions AMGS within the broader green chemistry toolkit. As the pharmaceutical industry advances toward ambitious sustainability targets like carbon-zero laboratories, AMGS will play an increasingly critical role in balancing analytical rigor with environmental responsibility. Future developments, including expanded technique support and refined calculation methodologies, promise to further enhance AMGS's value as an essential tool for sustainable biomedical research and development.

References

• 1. Embracing Sustainable Processes in the Pharmaceutical ... [https://scifiniti.com/3079-1421/1/2025.0013]
• 2. HPLC 2025 Preview: The Road To Sustainable Analytical ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/hplc-2025-preview-the-road-to-sustainable-analytical-chemistry]
• 3. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697060/]
• 4. Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095177924001102]
• 5. About the AMGS Calculator [https://acsgcipr.org/tools/about-the-amgs-calculator/]
• 6. Greenness assessment of 174 CEN, ISO, and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000336]
• 7. Recent application of green analytical chemistry: eco-friendly ... [https://fjps.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43094-024-00658-6]
• 8. Green Chemistry Research Tools, Guides & Best Practices [https://www.acs.org/green-chemistry-sustainability/research-innovation/research-tools.html]
• 9. An overview: origins and development of green chemistry [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10698-009-9079-4]
• 10. Green Chemistry & Sustainability [https://www.acs.org/green-chemistry-sustainability.html]
• 11. An overview: origins and development of green chemistry [https://chemistryforsustainability.org/publication/overview-origins-and-development-green-chemistry]
• 12. Greenness evaluation metric for analytical methods and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318332/]
• 13. Utilisation of Analytical Method Greenness Score to drive ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc01574j]
• 14. Analytical Method Greenness Score (AMGS) Calculator [https://chemistryforsustainability.org/tools-metrics/analytical-method-greenness-score-amgs-calculator]
• 15. The CHEM21 Solvent Selection Guide [https://learning.acsgcipr.org/guides-and-metrics/solvent-selection-guides/the-chem21-solvent-selection-guide/]
• 16. Solvent Selection from the Green Perspective [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/solvent-selection-from-the-green-perspective]
• 17. Utilisation of Analytical Method Greenness Score to drive ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/pt-br/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d5gc01574j]
• 18. Green metrics and green analytical applications [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000685]
• 19. Amg-nv [https://amg-nv.com/sustainability/environment/]
• 20. The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability | Sustainability Science [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5]
• 21. Analytical chemistry in the era of sustainability: evaluating ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158825000182]
• 22. Green and White Analytical Chemistry [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022354925004599]
• 23. Green Chemistry Metrics with Special Reference to ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/6/10928]
• 24. In silico modeling enables greener analytical and ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d4gc04300f]
• 25. Should we think about green or white analytical chemistry ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10589838/]
• 26. Green and white analytical approach for parallel ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-07056-9]
• 27. Cumulative Energy Demand System - an overview [https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/cumulative-energy-demand-system]
• 28. A method to calculate the cumulative energy demand (CED ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02978675]
• 29. Tools – ACSGCIPR [https://acsgcipr.org/tools/]
• 30. Cumulative energy demand (KEA) - Terms, definitions, ... [https://www.vdi.de/mitgliedschaft/vdi-richtlinien/details/vdi-4600-cumulative-energy-demand-kea-terms-definitions-methods-of-calculation]
• 31. Experimental and model-based approach to evaluate ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098724001386]
• 32. Finding the Right Solvent: A Novel Screening Protocol for ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37446671/]
• 33. Assessing environmental sustainability of HPLC methods ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577424000910]
• 34. Green Analytical Chemistry—Recent Innovations [https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4532/6/1/10]
• 35. A high-throughput robotic sample preparation system and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4516125/]
• 36. How to Reduce Mobile-Phase Consumption [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/how-reduce-mobile-phase-consumption]
• 37. Green Analytical Chemistry: Sustainable Methods and ... [https://www.labmanager.com/green-analytical-chemistry-sustainable-methods-and-practices-34268]
• 38. AGREE—Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588019/]
• 39. Evaluation of analytical greenness metric for an eco-friendly ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365310/]
• 40. Applying Analytical Method Greenness Scoring to the USP ... [https://www.waters.com/nextgen/us/en/library/application-notes/2024/applying-analytical-method-greenness-scoring-to-the-usp-monograph-of-naproxen-improving-the-sustainability-of-validated-methods-by-modernizing-to-newer-technology.html?srsltid=AfmBOop1AXKyfTeEZhXIy955gNw6B9-F-RMkVwdqazxE3B2cvEJOLfN5]
• 41. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Analytical Methods [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/the-green-component-assessing-the-environmental-impact-of-analytical-methods]
• 42. Tools and techniques for solvent : green selection ... solvent selection [https://sustainablechemicalprocesses.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40508-016-0051-z]
• 43. Potential of green solvents as mobile phases in liquid ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S002196732500158X]
• 44. introduction of the analytical method greenness score (AMGS ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/gc/c8gc03875a]
• 45. HPLC Tips & Tricks: Getting Greener in HPLC [https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/technical-documents/technical-article/analytical-chemistry/small-molecule-hplc/getting-greener-in-hplc?srsltid=AfmBOoqcF454ay4RNRCweznBguTNKluhuEyNQ7mKpnsyXzEhkQuMhQ71]
• 46. Renewable Solvent Market Size, Industry Share, Forecast ... [https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/renewable-solvent-market-104236]
• 47. Solvents Market Set for Strong Growth, Reaching USD 59 ... [https://www.openpr.com/news/4275937/solvents-market-set-for-strong-growth-reaching-usd-59-billion]
• 48. Green Solvents Market Research 2025-2035 [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/green-solvents-market-research-2025-084800250.html]
• 49. Green Approaches in High-Performance Liquid ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12430196/]
• 50. Green Solvents and UHPLC: Balancing Chromatographic ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/green-solvents-and-uhplc-balancing-chromatographic-performance-with-environmental-sustainability]
• 51. Advances in Green Analytical Techniques for Impurity ... [https://jyoungpharm.org/10.5530/jyp.20250075]
• 52. Assessment of greenness, blueness, and whiteness profiles of ... [https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13065-024-01377-y]
• 53. Moving Toward Green and Sustainable Sample Preparation [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/moving-toward-green-and-sustainable-sample-preparation]
• 54. Presenting Quantitative Data Graphically [https://courses.lumenlearning.com/waymakermath4libarts/chapter/presenting-quantitative-data-graphically/]
• 55. Presentation of Quantitative Data [https://ihatepsm.com/blog/presentation-quantitative-data]
• 56. Top 5 IAM Challenges in 2025—and How to Overcome Them [https://www.anomalix.com/blog/top-5-iam-challenges-in-2025--and-how-to-overcome-them]
• 57. How to Optimize the Experimental Protocol for Surface ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/13/5436]
• 58. Red analytical performance index (RAPI) and software [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/gc/d4gc05298f]
• 59. Editorial New Approach Methodologies in Drug Development [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359644625001886]
• 60. Enhancing Sustainable Analytical Chemistry in Liquid ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11243568/]
• 61. An Inside Look at the Analytical Method Greenness Score in High... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/an-inside-look-at-the-analytical-method-greenness-score-in-high-performance-liquid-chromatography-enantioseparations-an-earth-day-interview-with-daniel-armstrong]
• 62. Analytical Method Validation for Biopharmaceuticals [https://www.biopharminternational.com/view/analytical-method-validation-biopharmaceuticals-practical-guide]
• 63. Applying Analytical Method Greenness Scoring to the USP ... [https://www.waters.com/nextgen/us/en/library/application-notes/2024/applying-analytical-method-greenness-scoring-to-the-usp-monograph-of-naproxen-improving-the-sustainability-of-validated-methods-by-modernizing-to-newer-technology.html?srsltid=AfmBOoqlm2JYoyIDruA7UiaHaHlB_-CfL8r1MZm68U1bimlBERahC6Pb]
• 64. Understanding the 2025 AMV guidelines for pharmaceuticals [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/suresh-kumar-7781a4317_amv-2025-updates-activity-7381266609367191552-wqWY]
• 65. Green Analytical Method Development and Validation for ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41207555/]
• 66. A case study of a multipurpose novel janus kinase inhibitor [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577425000072]
• 67. Dual-platform integration of HPTLC and firefly algorithm ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12345108/]
• 68. Comparing the Greenness and Validation Metrics of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11137692/]
• 69. Development of a Validated High-Performance Thin-Layer ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/19/3859]
• 70. Development of a Validated High-Performance Thin-Layer ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41097281/?utm_source=FeedFetcher&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=None&utm_content=0lAgosEFCISvVtB9Gz6iR5ulz5j0-ZrCLAmXoXIH_-e&fc=None&ff=20251028054144&v=2.18.0.post22+67771e2]
• 71. Green Chemistry: What Is It (and What Is It Not)? And How ... [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/green-chemistry-what-is-it-and-what-is-it-not-and-how-does-it-apply-to-gas-chromatography-]
• 72. Optimization of analytical method greenness scores [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/gc/d3gc03005a]
• 73. Analytical Method Validation → Term [https://climate.sustainability-directory.com/term/analytical-method-validation/]
• 74. HPLC Tips & Tricks: Getting Greener in HPLC [https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/technical-documents/technical-article/analytical-chemistry/small-molecule-hplc/getting-greener-in-hplc?srsltid=AfmBOooTYjUxmSOB-36vuos0X1G-8RNhYHxyyo7eBrZAwuUvhdr8eF3D]
• 75. How Green is the Future of Chromatography? [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/how-green-is-the-future-of-chromatography-]
• 76. Utilisation of Analytical Method Greenness Score to drive ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926225009458]
• 77. Applying Analytical to the USP... Method Greenness Scoring [https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/applying-analytical-method-greenness-scoring-to-the-usp-monograph-of-naproxen-improving-the-sustainability-of-validated-methods-by-modernizing-to-newer-technology]